To The Daily Sun,

Our Constitution wouldn’t have been ratified, nor would its Second Amendment have been adopted, if Americans believed either would limit their individual rights to “keep and bear arms.” Beliefs to the contrary show, in my opinion, a misunderstanding of history and our Constitution’s purpose.

When our Constitution was adopted, firearms were essential tools in everyday life for many, perhaps most, people. Firearms were used for hunting, protection (people often lived far apart) from human and animal predators that threatened people and livestock, and were essential in winning freedom from England, and in conducting earlier and possibly future wars.

The purpose of the U.S. Constitution is to protect, not limit, people’s rights. Our Constitution gives government specified authorities/powers which don’t include the power to limit citizens’ “arms” (weapons).

Our Constitution’s authors didn’t believe specifying protections of citizens' rights were needed, but to allay fears, they promised Amendments to specify individual protections from government oppression. The first 10 Amendments, our Bill of Rights, protects citizens’ rights, including the right to “keep and bear arms,” from infringement by government.

No constitutional amendments authorize government to take away law-abiding citizens’ firearms. Guns were legally bought through the mail until 1968. Nevertheless, the Supreme Court approved, seemingly violating our constitutional rights, some local laws on firearm use and some restrictions on things like automatic weapons and hand grenades.

We all want, and pass laws, to be safer. But laws don’t stop criminals or terrorists.

As we have seen, disarming law-abiding people, defunding and restricting police, and not punishing or lightly punishing criminals only make life less safe. Criminals are emboldened to commit more crimes and victimize more innocent people.

Recognizing people's needs and human nature, our founding fathers wisely protected people’s individual rights, including “to keep and bear arms.”

Don Ewing

Meredith

(1) comment

Eric Herr Staff
Eric Herr

The purpose of the Constitution is clearly and powerfully stated in the Preamble. True, Rights are an important, perhaps THE important, ingredient to serve that greater purpose. But when rights have compromised those ends, our rights have evolved and we the People have amended the Constitution, 17 times after the Bill of Rights was ratified. Is the 2nd Amendment immune from similar examination, no matter its effect our the greater purpose articulated in the Preamble?

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.