MEREDITH — Town warrants do not usually address global issues, but an exception will play out on March 11.

Warrant Article 16 asks voters to “take action on climate pollution.”

It is advisory only, urging lawmakers to take action. 

“We the town of Meredith hereby call upon our State and Federal elected representatives to enact carbon-pricing legislation to protect New Hampshire from the costs and environmental risks of continued climate inaction,” the warrant article states. 

“To protect households, we support a Carbon Fee and Dividend approach that charges fossil fuel producers for their carbon pollution and rebates the money collected to all residents on an equal basis.”

Meredith resident Rick DeMark, a volunteer with the Carbon Cash-Back Coalition, said 40 people signed a petition to get the issue on the town warrant. A total of 25 signatures were needed.

DeMark said climate pollution needs to be reduced and that carbon fees and dividends are the cheapest and fairest way to do this, while creating jobs, saving lives and protecting household purchasing power. 

“The bottom line here is to motivate innovation and get away from fossil fuels,” DeMark said. “Until a value, a fee, is placed on carbon, there’s no incentive for the emitters to change.”

State and federal legislation

State and federal legislation has been introduced that would assess a fee on carbon-based fuel at the first point of sale or extraction, with most of the money to be rebated to consumers. 

The state legislation, New Hampshire House Bill 735, was tabled. Opponents said it would disrupt the economy, hurt consumers and not reduce carbon emissions. The federal legislation is pending. 

A fiscal impact statement in the state bill said 95 percent of the revenue collected would be disbursed to residential, commercial and industrial energy users and greenhouse gas reduction programs.

The applicable New Hampshire annual greenhouse gas emissions are estimated to be 15 million tons of carbon dioxide equivalents. Fees on these emissions would generate nearly $800 million in revenue by 2023.

Scientific consensus

A NASA statement says:

Multiple studies published in peer-reviewed scientific journals show that 97 percent or more of actively publishing climate scientists agree: Climate-warming trends over the past century are extremely likely due to human activities. In addition, most of the leading scientific organizations worldwide have issued public statements endorsing this position.”

The U.S. National Academy of Sciences, the American Meteorological Society and the American Medical Association are among those organizations that have issued statements saying human-caused climate change is occurring.  

The 10 warmest years in the 140-year record all have occurred since 2005, according to NASA.

Rep. Michael Vose, R-Epping, who is on the state House Science Technology and Energy Committee, said in an interview Thursday that NASA is incorrect.

"The people who put together the 97 percent consensus claim used dubious data," he said. "It has been extensively examined and debunked by people who have examined it closely."

State opposition

Vose said a carbon tax would affect so many products that dividends would not keep pace with consumer costs. He also said that consumers must have fuel oil to heat homes and gasoline to power cars so it's unlikely demand for such products would decline enough to significantly reduce greehouse gas emissions.     

Vose spoke against the bill at a hearing in Concord.

“The collapse of the New Hampshire economy is what this carbon tax will likely induce,” he testified. “Since surrounding states will not have adopted this tax, energy prices in those states will become lower than those here. 

“People will drive to neighboring states to buy cheaper gas. Renters, especially those who commute out of state to work, will move there because apartment utilities will be lower. Since all goods and services vendors in New Hampshire will be subject to the carbon tax, the price of everything will go up. This inflation will cut back on other expenses, such as labor. Jobs will be lost. Companies may eventually be forced to relocate out of state. New Hampshire will fall into a death spiral of economic chaos.”

Towns and cities

Citizens Climate Lobby coordinator John Gage said 29 towns have accepted petitions to put the climate pollution article on local ballots, including Plymouth, Holderness and Rumney, in addition to Meredith. 

He said subsequent efforts will target cities and other towns.

"A total of 46 countries already have a price on carbon emissions and some, like the EU, are considering applying border carbon adjustment tariffs on imports from countries that don't match their price," Gage said.

"This is the same approach that the federal bill uses to protect US jobs and strongly encourage all other countries to match our carbon price. 

"In other words, we will likely see a price on climate pollution coming soon, the real question is whether our economy will be competitive in a world that is pricing carbon."
DeMark is to make a presentation on the warrant article at 6 p.m. March 3 at the Meredith Public Library.
On the Web:
Carbon Cash-Back Coalition:
NASA Global Climate Change:


Recommended for you

(1) comment

John Gage

Thank you so much for your accurate reporting about climate change and how confident scientists are in the conclusion that it is extremely likely that the global warming we've seen since the middle of the last century is due to human activities, mainly the greenhouse gas pollution from using fossil fuels. Another great resource that explains what we know through science and how confident those conclusions are is the Fourth National Climate Assessment. The two-page Highlights section of the Executive Summary makes it perfectly clear:

Volume II of that report describes what we know through science about the impacts and risks of global warming and the changes in climate, sea level, and ocean acidification from fossil fuel pollution:

Thank you also for helping communicate the beneficial results we'll get by addressing the failure of the market to account for the costs of using fossil fuels in their price with cash-back carbon pricing. For anyone who wonders how this policy will affect their budget, try the Carbon Dividend Calculator available on this page: Anyone with a below-average carbon footprint will come out ahead. It turns out that's most of us!

The border carbon adjustments will protect US jobs from trade in countries that allow free pollution, and strongly encourage them to match our carbon price. That is a critical part of solving the problem, which is why most people who have studied it closely support this approach. See the "Look Who's Talking" video at the bottom of this page to see the wide variety of people from both parties who support it:

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.