The planned biopic Scandalous! might not reach theaters, but it sounds like subject Kim Novak wouldn’t mind if it didn’t. In a new interview, Novak expressed dismay that Sydney Sweeney was cast to play her in the film.

“I would never have approved,” the Vertigo star told The Times in a profile posted online on Friday. “[Sweeney] sticks out so much above the waist.”

Scandalous!, announced a year and a half ago, would have Colman Domingo directing Sweeney, his Euphoria costar, in a biopic about the 1950s-era romance between Novak and singer Sammy Davis Jr., played by David Jonsson.

Novak told The Times she and Davis were drawn to each other because they had “so much in common,” and she worries the casting of the buxom Sweeney would mean the film would focus on them having sexual chemistry. “There’s no way it wouldn’t be a sexual relationship because Sydney Sweeney looks sexy all the time,” she reasoned. “She was totally wrong to play me.”

Kim Novak poses at a photocall during the Febiofest Prague International Film Festival on March 20, 2015, in Prague, Czech Republic

Matej Divizna/Getty Images

In the same interview, Novak gave more insight into her 1957 tryst with Davis. Rumor had it that Harry Cohn, then president of Columbia Pictures, paid a mobster to threaten to break Davis’ legs and blind him unless the “Something’s Gotta Give” singer married a Black woman. (Under the threat of violence, Davis married Loray White, a Black singer, in 1958, according to Smithsonian.)

And Novak told The Times she believes that rumor. “Oh, I know it was true,” she said. “Because of the color of [Davis’] skin, people did terrible things.”

But she denied reports that she and the Rat Pack star got a marriage license. “No, no,” she said. “I mean, he loved me. I cared for him deeply. But at that time I never wanted to marry anybody.”

The Times notes that development on Scandalous! seems to be at a standstill, but Sweeney previously raved about the prospect of playing Novak.

“I’m incredibly honored to be bringing Kim to life. I mean, she is such an amazing actress,” she told People in October 2025. “I think her story is still very relevant today in that she dealt with Hollywood and scrutiny with her relationships and her own private life and the control of her image. And I think that for me, I relate to it in a lot of different ways.”

More Headlines:

Originally published on tvinsider.com, part of the BLOX Digital Content Exchange.

(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.