A+ A A-

Focus on creating environment where all can succeed beyond dreams

To The Daily Sun,

For more than 50 years I've heard progressives/liberals/socialists/Democrats (PLSDs) like Anne Rogers (see her Jan. 14 letter in The Laconia Daily Sun) demanding more and more taxes from productive citizens. No matter how much government takes, the PLSDs demand more money.

What major problems do they solve with the money? None. The money funds bureaucracies, wasteful and often counter-productive programs, fraud and abuse, and the special-interests that reward PLSD politicians.

Public school cost increases equal or exceed healthcare cost increases but often provide poor results. Government programs don't make people successful (that would eliminate the need for the bureaucracy), they lock people into dependence on government.

PLSDs don't encourage the economic growth needed to actually help people become prosperous; instead they stifle growth by increasing taxes and regulations. Consequently more Americans are poorer and on welfare than ever before.

The PLSDs claim to need money to fix our roads and bridges, but they spend the money collected for roads and bridges on other things. A few years ago President Obama received enough money to fix all our needy roads and bridges, almost $1 trillion, but he spent most of the money rewarding his political supporters, not fixing our infrastructure.

Despite their false claims, the PLSDs don't care about actually improving people's lives; they demonstrate this by fighting against school choice (which would allow students to escape failing and often dangerous schools) and policies that encourage the real economic growth needed to create good jobs.

The taxes and regulations the PLSDs impose to reward supporters also make people change their behavior in ways that reduce tax income and often further retard economic growth and opportunities, e.g., people work less, they move their residencies and/or businesses to lower-tax states, they change their income sources to reduce taxes (like Democrat VP Candidate John Edwards did), and they generally don't relocate to places where their productive efforts are excessively taxed away.

New Hampshire's elected representatives shouldn't focus on increasing taxes. They should focus on creating an environment where everyone can succeed beyond their wildest dreams.

People around the country and the world should hear that the New Hampshire is the place to go to be successful. Entrepreneurs should see that businesses can start or relocate here and grow, enabling the owners and New Hampshire workers to become wealthy.

Hopefully New Hampshire's legislators will focus on creating an environment that fosters success. That would provide good jobs and opportunities for New Hampshire citizens, and richly fund our state and local governments.

Don Ewing

Meredith

Last Updated on Friday, 16 January 2015 10:47

Hits: 217

Kind of makes you wonder where N.H. government gets its money

To The Daily Sun,

Regarding the Meredith roundabouts proposal, we have learned some existing multi-lane road sections will be turned to one lane. We learned that no one discussed the queuing necessitated when the traffic from the two-lane section through the Highway 3/25 intersection must merge to one at the Pleasant Street roundabout. We learned at Dover Street and Highway 3/25 traffic will become right turn only.

We learned the project, if accepted by "We the People" in the town of Meredith is scheduled to start in 2017. We learned the area will be dug up for more than a year as a result of the construction. We learned the expected completion date is sometime in 2018. No discussion was heard about the month of initiation or completion. We are left to infer what we will from that. It could mean two summers with the main highways through the downtown area under construction.

Will the eateries on Main Street profit decline? Was this issue part of the discussion of the Advisory Committee? Will children and families be able to reach the knowledge center of Meredith, our Meredith Library? Will the gridlock at the roundabouts cause family disruption?

We learned the committee and McFarland Johnson referred those with questions to the NHDOT website, specifically to the projects page where the Meredith Highway 3/25 project can be found. By going there one learns that the studies done are for the initial project back in 2006. By going there one learns that the data is 10 years out of date. By going there one learns that the project is quite different than the one we are being asked to review and approve today. By going there one learns that the presenters were deflecting specific questions by reference to an essentially different study rejected nearly a decade earlier.

My recommendation is that you do your homework on this project. The presenters stated the road project is scheduled to take place in 2017 and 2018, the project will not solve the congestion issue, the proposal will beautify the area, and there will be over $5 million spent, but it will not cost you anything. The inference is: government is giving you free money which we can either take or decline. Kind of makes you wonder where they get their money, doesn't it?

You are encouraged to go to the public hearing on Jan. 26 and find what's going to happen to you. It would be better if you did a little homework and lend an informed voice to the discussion.

Rosemary Landry

Meredith

Last Updated on Friday, 16 January 2015 10:31

Hits: 189

A report from the Belknap Mill Society special meeting of members

To The Daily Sun,

A special meeting of the members of the Belknap Mill Society was held at 7:30 a.m. on January 14. The purpose of the meeting was to update the members regarding the current status of the mill and to take the pulse of the membership with regard to the future of the ownership of the building. 40 members were in attendance.

The board's President, Christine Santaniello, opened the meeting, and after introductions, explained that the mill has been in a difficult financial situation for decades and is down to bare bones staffing. The Society requires revenue of $150,000 annually to operate the buildings and programming. She explained that the board is exploring long term solutions for sustainability of the Society and stressed that the mill building should remain in the hands of the public. She explained that the first option is to explore a relationship with the city, but if this is unattainable, there may be a future with the Belknap Economic Development Council, as the mill is essential to the revitalization of downtown.

Following Santaniello's opening comments, Vice-President Allison Ambrose led a membership input session on possible long-term, sustainable solutions. The members of the Society provided valuable input and suggestions for alternative long-term sustainability. Constructive thoughts came from many passionate members, including attorney Patrick Wood, Tom Tardif, Marcia Cotter, Al Posnack, Hazel Zimmer, Deb Drake, John Pounds and George Roberts. Discussion was had relative to capital campaigns, membership drives, fundraising, working with schools and finding commercial tenants to occupy the vacant second floor space. After a tally, 23 of the present 40 members felt that the Belknap Mill Society should retain ownership of the building. Eighteen of the present members graciously offered to help the Society during this difficult time.

Following the member discussion, Managing Director Beth San Soucie offered an overview of the Society's 2015 goals. Preservation of the building was top on the list, followed by programming. The boiler for the building's heating system needs updating, an expensive undertaking. In addition to the heating system, the Society is working to restore the finial and cupola this spring, and with any remaining funds and grants, will continue to pursue the window project, roof repairs and other necessary building needs. Ms. San Soucie demonstrated thanks for those who offered to volunteer or assist with pro bono work referrals.
The meeting concluded with the board's pledge to consider all matters discussed at the Special Member Meeting. The Belknap Mill Society's Annual Meeting will occur in February 2015, at which time the issue of the building ownership will be presented to the membership for a vote. The date will be made known to the membership and posted on the Belknap Mill Society Website.

Board of Trustees

Belknap Mill Society

 

Last Updated on Friday, 16 January 2015 10:26

Hits: 245

People who make excuses for Muslim terrorists are not liberals

To The Daily Sun,

Wednesday morning I was pleased to see my letter to the editor expressing my anger at liberal media and predicting they and phony liberals would be writing excuse after excuse for the Muslim terrorist massacre in France.

Right on cue, immediately below my letter, was another doing exactly what I predicted. The writer of this letter blamed the victims, made excuses for the Muslim terrorists and this person says he's a liberal. He is not. He is as far from a liberal as a person can get. He does not stand up for liberal values only hides behind them for convenience when it suits him.

I'll refrain from labeling him but say only, he is not a liberal.

Steve Earle

Hill

Last Updated on Friday, 16 January 2015 10:22

Hits: 264

Sanbornton residents: look for 6 question survey in your mail

To The Daily Sun,

The Sanbornton Budget Committee meets every month to discuss both ongoing town finances and the upcoming FY16 budget. However, very few if any residents bother to come to the committee meetings to make their concerns known.
In an effort to encourage resident input to the upcoming FY16 budget, four members of the committee have produced a survey that will be mailed to all Sanbornton residents the week January 19th. The survey is being paid for by committee members and is not funded in any way with town money. However, due to the cost of postage, we were not able to include a postage paid response envelope with the survey.
I want to encourage all Sanbornton residents to look for the survey in the mail, take the time to answer the six simple questions, and then return the survey.
Answering the questions should take no more the 60 seconds i.e. how do you feel about property taxes — too low ___, about right____, too high? etc. The bottom part of the survey provides directions on how to return your answers; e-mail or snail mail. For the cost of a 1st class stamp or the effort necessary to push a computer button you can make your views known during the Sanbornton budget process.

Roger Grey
Sanbornton

Last Updated on Thursday, 15 January 2015 11:55

Hits: 231

The Laconia Daily Sun - All Rights Reserved
Privacy Policy
Powered by BENN a division of the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette