To The Daily Sun,
During difficult times of economic recession or depression, the right-wing lobby suddenly becomes very supportive of everyone's "freedoms". Despite the misery caused by an economic downturn, which they often caused, these reactionaries tell us that we should be fearful of any government efforts to alleviate the suffering or help the average citizen.
Happily, if we look at American history, we can see where these cynical efforts end up. In 1934, the largest corporations in the country led by DuPont, Standard Oil, and General Motors, openly formed an organization called The American Liberty League. Its main goal was to defeat President Franklin Roosevelt's New Deal and warn of "creeping socialism".
Cunningly, the League made sizable contributions to leading Democratic politicians so they would criticize Roosevelt's policies. Al Smith and John W. Davis, former Democratic candidates for president, and John Jacob Roskob, Democratic Party Chairman warned that Roosevelt was on the path to anarchy, as well as our loss of freedom. Luckily, the League began a rapid decline by 1936 when Roosevelt beat Alf Landon in a landslide, claiming, "the League wants to squeeze the worker dry in his old age and cast him like an orange rind into the refuse pail."
Today, we have the Koch brothers' Americans for Prosperity and the Tea Party, the heirs of the Liberty League.
How long before they all share the same fate?
Last Updated on Thursday, 18 September 2014 11:05
To The Daily Sun,
The responsibility of serving as representative is to look after the interests of over 6,200 constituents, in five towns. This is a volunteer position that carries a great deal responsibility. It takes 24/7 concentration that should not be taken likely. That is why state Sen. Jeanie Forrester is so successful in the job she has been doing. The same goes for Executive Councilor Joe Kenney.
These positions in state government require all of one's time in order for it to work. If the voter fails to elect responsible, unselfish candidates who are willing to give 100 percent of themselves to our branches of government, we all lose. Please know your candidates before you just vote for the first name you see on a ballot. Talk to your local town officials about your representative and senate candidates. They will know their candidates. Voting because of a sign on the road or mailer in the box is irresponsible. Talk to the people you chose to elect and know their mind, before making more rash decisions in November.
This is the United States of America, the envy of the Free World, envy of our rights, which has pushed for democracy all over the world. The passe approach to voting on election day is a joke. Let's prove to ourselves, that we know better on how to chose our leaders. If you don't know your candidate, you can get screwed out of government.
I will be proud to hold a totem out side my voting station in November for Jeanie and Joe.
Don't forget your pen.
Eric T. Rottenecker
Last Updated on Thursday, 18 September 2014 11:02
To The Daily Sun,
On Tuesday, I called my three federal representatives, Senator Shaheen, Senator Ayotte, and Congresswoman Shea-Porter to find out their position on auditing the Federal Reserve.
The auditing the Federal Reserve issue has been around for quite some time. There was not one staffer who knew where the senator/representative stood. I find that odd. A person is either for auditing the Federal Reserve or they are against auditing the Federal Reserve. Simple question. The person should know by now where they stand on this issue, and yet no one could answer it.
I was asked to leave my e-mail so they could reply. I did not give it. I gave my phone number. I wanted to know the answer. I did not want an e-mail that had nothing to do with my question sent to me as in the past.
I just called Rep. Shea-Porter's office again. HR-24, which wants the Federal Reserve audited, will be up for a vote today (Wednesday). The intern and the staffer did not know how she was going to vote. Yes, no or not at all. The person on the phone wanted to send me an e-mail with the response and not return my phone call with a phone call. This is unacceptable.
Our representatives work for us. Not enough staff. How long does a phone call saying "yes, no or not voting" take? I do not want an e-mail with spin. I just want an honest answer. Is that too much to ask from a representative?
Last Updated on Thursday, 18 September 2014 10:51
To The Daily Sun,
While we hope and pray for common sense and courage to save us in November 2014 and 2016, I continue to struggle to understand the liberal/progressive mind in general and our current president in particular. So I have turned to writers for American Thinker and Townhall.com. Stu Tarlowe, a blogger for American Thinker, offers some clarity as delivered by Damian Housman, a retired Air Force lieutenant colonel, who offers some insight into the mainstream media (the left).
Remember how the Oslo mass-murderer was labeled as a "right winger"? Missing from the narrative was that right wing in Europe refers to a form of socialism. He was reportedly part of the Swedish Nazi Forum and we know that Nazi means national socialist, which of course is the antithesis of right wing in America.
Stu asserts that when you read a book of fiction, "Lenin in Zurich", a factual secret comes to life. "Socialism does not exist except in the imagination of the true believer and the useful idiot. It discovers that Lenin, Stalin, Hitler, Mussolini, Mao, Deng, Pol Pot, Castro and Solzhenitsyn himself all knew this and used it as a means of fooling mass numbers of people into following them." So socialism is anything but a system of providing justice for the masses. It is a deceitful system devised to provide absolute power to tyrants. Please raise your hand if you are shocked to read this revelation.
I next turned to historian Victor Davis Hanson to help me out with the puzzling way that progressive-liberals react when faced with evil. "He believes history follows some predetermined course, as if things always get better on their own. Obama often praises those he pronounces to be on the 'right side' of history." He also chastises others for being on the 'wrong side' of history — as if evil is vanished and the good thrives on autopilot."
Remember the 2009 "green revolution" when millions of Iranians took to the streets to protest the theocratic Mahmoud Ahmadinejad regime and begged for U.S. support? Our president offered them comfort by promising them they were on the "right side" of history. Hanson notes that Obama often invokes Martin Luther King Jr.'s phrase about the "arc of the moral universe" naturally bending toward justice, when MLK meant that as a metaphor as an incentive to act and not as some assurance that an inevitably positive course will follow.
More utopian, nonsensical remarks by President Obama include two marvelous examples. Remember when he chastised Putin for behavior that doesn't belong in the 21st century? Did ole Vlad go into deep reflection or did he take over Crimea and then more of Ukraine while perhaps setting his sights on the Baltic states. Then our president gets down to some real tough talk. He lectured on about how the barbarous aggression of Vladimir Putin or ISIS has no place in our century and will ultimately fail.
Ideological fantasy, intellectual laziness or incompetent leadership, take your pick. All equate to danger for this country and President Obama epitomizes all three to a disastrous degree. Our president only acts to attack Republicans and conservatives while confronting real evil with disappearing red lines. From Genghis Khan and the Barbary Pirates to Boko Haram and ISIS, human nature in its most evil form has always existed and always will. Some delusional belief in predetermined history of good over evil as a cover for inaction is reckless and irresponsible.
No wonder some believe that the modern day liberal, progressive mindset borders on mental illness. That would be the bunch that wants to micro-manage the lives of ordinary citizens. Is there a psychiatrist in the house?
Last Updated on Thursday, 18 September 2014 10:13
To The Daily Sun,
In a recent contribution to this forum, Mr. "I don't have to proof anything" Earle has the audacity to suggest that Mr. Hoyt only voted for President Obama "because he is black"; talk about playing the race card! Obama won 69.5 million votes in 2008 and 65.9 million votes in 2012; is Earle suggesting that all these voters cast their ballots for him just because of the color of his skin? He is the first president in more than five decades to win at least 51 percent of the national vote twice. White conservatives have gone so far as saying that racism is no longer a problem in America and doesn't even exist anymore — apparently Earle didn't get the memo.
While I would never presume to claim why any individual votes the way he or she does, I would like to suggest a number of possible reasons the Democrats won the presidency in 2008.
The previous Republican administration failed to "keep us safe." On September 11th our country experienced the deadliest terrorist attack on U.S. soil. Despite repeated, urgent warnings from intelligence officials and the prior president about an impending al Qaeda attack, this administration did nothing. Evidence compiled by the 9/11 Commission showed that this Republican administration sought to stymie and mislead the investigation. It has been clear for years that the administration ignored many warnings about Al Qaeda. Conservatives, suffering from historic amnesia, continue to behave as if facts uncovered by the 9/11 Commission never emerged.
This Republican administration embraced global isolationism, first by withdrawing from the 1972 Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty taking the United States in a direction not seen since World War I. They gutted global political progress by pulling out of the Kyoto Protocol which set requirements for 38 nations to lower greenhouse gas emissions to combat climate change. Then squandered global goodwill after 9/11 by thumbing their nose at world sympathy for the victims of the September 11, 2001 attacks, by declaring a global war on terrorism and declaring "you are either with us or against us." Continuing in this vain, this administration abandoned the International Criminal Court and ignored an international ban on torture.
The administration soon started beating war drums for an attack on Iraq, where there was no proven al Qaeda link, instead of Afghanistan where the 9/11 bombers had trained and Osama bin Laden was based. The administration tried to get the U.N. Security Council to authorize an attack on Iraq, which it refused to do. This Republican Administration decided to lead a "preemptive" attack regardless of international consequences. A National Intelligence estimate asserted that the Iraq war increased Islamic radicalism and had worsened the terror threat. It has been estimated that the costs of the Iraq and Afghan wars will read between $4 trillion and $6 trillion, when the long-term medical costs are added in for wounded veterans. In response to veterans, this same administration, that was sending young men and women off to war, cut funding for veteran's healthcare by several billion.
The president of the previous Republican administration was thought by many to be president in name only. The power-hungry and arrogant trio of Cheney running the White House; Rove the political operations; and Rumsfeld overseeing the wars were the ones in control. And while conservative contributors are outraged when President Obama takes a vacation, the previous Commander-in- Chief, distinguished by a dubious military career, to the point of being accused of being AWOL, took 1,020 days of vacation time in two four-year terms — more than one of every three days. No other president comes close. He set the record for the longest vacation among modern presidents — five weeks.
I've only highlighted a few of the many reasons 51 percent of the voters may have cast their ballots the way they did other than the color of a man's skin. Personally, I have always admired John McCain, and despite misgivings, was giving his candidacy strong consideration until his unfortunate chose of a running mate.
Last Updated on Thursday, 18 September 2014 09:58