BankofNH DreamBig 728x90

Letter Submission

To submit a letter to the editor, please email us at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. Letters must contain the author's name, hometown (state as well, if not in New Hampshire) and phone number, but the number will not be published. We do not run anonymous letters. Local issues get priority, as do local writers. We encourage writers to keep letters to no more than 400 words, but will accept longer letters to be run on a space-available basis. Editors reserve the right to edit letters for spelling, grammar, punctuation, excessive length and unsuitable content.


Mayor willing to sacrifice the Weirs for Laconia's need of money

To The Daily Sun,
I gave very emotional testimony this week at the Laconia Planning Board meeting against the mayor's proposal for a new zoning corridor for Route 3 — or Endicott North — from White Oaks Road to the Meredith Line for commercial growth. We live in the Weirs and have owned here for 37 years. We have seen it good times mobbed with families and the bad times.

— There has been no great demand for commercial growth or a zoning corridor as it is. Why is this? Ten-plus parcels are currently for sale. Why put more restrictions on what they could be used for? There are currently not enough year-round customers to justify commercial uses.

— Laconia's Charter would prevent anyone from developing these properties until after all the new zoning regulations are complete. Once a public meeting has been announced for a change in zoning, which will happen in a week or two, no one can present a new development to the Planning Board, by City Charter. By law you cannot cherry pick changes dependent on the mayor's approval.

— Years ago, Laconia's Planning Department proudly won a competitive grant by the EPA to study and to report on a very professional assessment of Laconia. Their experts spent weeks researching everything about Laconia; "the books," its charter, what residents, business owners, government and departments of Laconia, various volunteer boards and anyone else interested. The result was a very comprehensive report re. their professional recommendations for future growth for the three major areas of Laconia — downtown; Lakeport and The Weirs. Each one is very different in its character and needs. EPA had many experts of land planning, economists, engineers , marketing, etc... . This report was never mentioned. The mayor created a plan just on his own thoughts, bypassing the usual Laconia professionals and volunteer boards with their expertise and the specified ways to change zoning (Planning Department ,Planning Board, ZBA, professional city departments etc..) or even to show there is any demand.

— The mayor's proposal (he who has no expertise in these areas) ignored the report and wants to put all new taxes on The Weirs for all of Laconia. This area is the main entryways to the Weirs Beach Resort area. We are again treated as the ugly stepchild of Laconia. If the proposal sounds too good to be true (for tax relief), it usually is!

— Laconia has industrial parks where his football size buildings are appropriate, and there is space available, but in actuality how much demand has there been?

— I disagree that this is the only area for commercial growth in Laconia. Other parts of the city are great for commercial growth. Downtown Laconia has many empty buildings on Main Street. Union Avenue is already mostly commercial and there are for rent/sale signs.

— I disagree that there should be no residential building in this area, unless above the first floor. There is tremendous residential property there already. Why bring this commercial-only corridor into a place where it could devalue all their property as well as risk the success of the current resort type businesses and rentals.

— Driving through a major entryway to the Weirs with football field size buildings and commercial business plus the added truck and traffic would certainly change The Weirs and add a stark negative contrast to the resort of Meredith.

— The Weirs and its entryways are currently designated for resort commercial. Not once did the mayor comment on the value of Lake Winnipesaukee. It is not just the gem of Laconia and the Lakes Region, but all New Hampshire. This area represents one of the largest tourist areas of this region. Located together we have the Mt Washington boat, the mail boats, the Hobo Railroad, stately Victorian buildings and boardwalk, arcades, the best beach of any town or city around the lake and beautiful views of the lake and the mountains.

We have a very large business of family rental cottages and motels in the Weirs. Currently Laconia is paying big money for renovations to the Weirs that should help with demand and growth. Making this area year-round should be a priority, as the EPA recommended. The son of a large property owner stated they are considering a large wedding/conference center and hotel with incredible views of Winnipesaukee and the mountains. This is the way to grow and improve our image and tax base.

— The proposal wants no green space requirements. Green areas help prevent flooding and destruction. Someone stated a green requirement would prevent a current prospect from buying the Weirs Drive In movie property. This spot shouts out for green space since the front can drain into Winnipesaukee the back drains into the channel and Paugus Bay, Laconia's water supply. Maintaining its current use is a wonderful tourist attraction and part of the history of the Weirs. Special consideration could help. Green space could hide less desirable uses and people come to N.H. expecting to see woods, and trees.

— The mayor did not discuss the future of Bike Week. Every year attendance has gone down. This and its success or failure represents the Weirs and all Laconia. It is the silent elephant in any discussion of the Weirs that must be addressed.

— The mayor would like to rush his proposal through. The last time the Mayor and City Council rushed something through was LaconiaFest ... which failed and the city lost money, protests from residents of the blaring harsh music for miles and miles. If it sounds too good to be true ... it usually is. Another black eye for the Weirs resort image.

— A previous mayor and City Council tried to ignore the resort quality. The Weirs revolted and almost won the succession of The Weirs from Laconia. The cash cow was almost lost. This could happen again.

Mary Hutchins


  • Category: Letters
  • Hits: 681

If you want to talk about candidate who was most charitable with his own money it was Romney

To The Daily Sun,

How charitable are the presidential candidates? Personal generosity is a strong sign of character and a sensitivity barometer to the needs of those who may have far less. The answer to the question may both surprise and amuse you. The answer greatly depends on whether the politician is giving away HIS MONEY or YOURS. Altruism by force through government and voluntary charity by the candidate can be as different as night and day.
There are few people unaware of the Clinton foundation. It was established in 1997 by Bill Clinton to marshal up donations from many donors, including other countries. It has been run first and foremost as a political advantage with charity dangling off the end like a caboose. Allegations of conflicts of interest has dogged both the foundation and the Clintons personally since the start. Hard ,factual Information from email investigations has only increased the suspicions and intensified the criticism of both the foundation and Hillary. The criticisms have rung especially true during Hillary's term as secretary of state, where Clinton Foundation donors contacted her directly looking for access. " Pay to play "have become the words synonymous with the Clinton foundation.
"I am rich, very rich" Donald Trump has a charitable "family foundation." It operates as the same "front " as the Clinton Foundation, only on a much smaller scale. Family foundations are usually established to distribute money from the people who establish the foundation. Has Trump has been GENEROUS with his money?" In 2014 the family foundation reported assets of $1.3 million. For a man of Trumps wealth that is "Trump change." For the past 10 years the foundation has received exactly ZERO contributions from Trump or his family. The only donors have been friends and "business connections." The media has hunted in vain to find charitable gifts Trump has made outside his foundation with little success. If he made one he demanded Girl Scout cookies in exchange.
Are the Clintons charitable personally. Hillary Clinton, "the candidate" who wants to get elected HANDING OUT YOUR MONEY TO OTHERS shows little interest to donate much of HER OWN MONEY to those with less. Margaret Thatcher famously said that is exactly why socialism fails. It always goes bankrupt spending "OTHER PEOPLES MONEY." In 1992, when Bill was running for president, it was revealed he and Hillary took a tax deduction for used underwear and clothing with rips. I am sure it was legitimate. We all found out Bill's Jockey shorts got some heavy use back then. And who can't believe from what we now know of Hillary today she wouldn't let a tax "LOOP HOLE" go taking a write off for some stretched out bras?
How about Obama, the biggest GIVE AWAY president of others peoples money in American history. How charitable is he with his OWN MONEY? The answer is not very. In 1992, before he became a figure in the public eye, Obama gave LESS than 1 percent of his TWO HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLAR income to charity. That level of income would put him in the top 10 percent that year while the average American making a tiny fraction of that averages 2 percent to charity. For a man who claims his deepest concern for the poor his personal charity reveals LITTLE sensitivity for them with his own money.
How about VP Joe Biden. Joe could be described in one word, Scrooge. Prior to 2008, he gave a MINISCULE percentages of what placed he and his wife in the top tier of American income earners. After 2008 he increased charity a teeny, tiny bit but he still gives well less than the average American.
The Democrats, the people who can't wait to dig deep into your pocket to FORCE CHARITY FROM YOU to every "always go broke, donkey contraption" they can dream up to get elected, are among the CHEAPEST PEOPLE on Earth (no matter their wealth or income) compared to many people, often conservatives, who are far more generous to the less fortunate with their money, including the much hated Koch Brothers.
If we want to elect the president who is most CHARITABLE with his OWN MONEY then Mitt Romney would just be finishing up his 8th year as president. Mitt gives 30 PERCENT of his personal income yearly, to charity. No Clinton fronts, no Trump gimmicks, no BS. He gives more of his personal money to charity than dozens of the top and most vocal Democrats in the country, including Bernie Sanders, COMBINED. Politicians who can't stop screaming for more charity out of YOUR WALLET, NOT THEIRS. In 2012, Democrats screamed Mitt wasn't sensitive enough to the poor and average American. I submit to you he is far more sensitive than any Democrat in office today, including Hillary Clinton. The hubris, arrogance and BS of the Democratic Party as it involves charity and the poor is beyond the pale to laughable.
Tony Boutin

  • Category: Letters
  • Hits: 276