To The Daily Sun,
Laconia Firefighters risked their lives to save one of two idiots who took their snowmobiles 1,400 feet on thin ice, offshore at dusk in open water on Lake Winnisquam last weekend.
Even I have learned over the years that when you weigh in around 300, you don't venture out on thin ice on Fishing Derby Weekend.
Laconia and Gilford train for these winter lake rescues all the time. Thank God they do. There are enough white crosses on our shorelines as it is. I don't think Terry and Andrew will be running any open water any time soon.
Last Updated on Wednesday, 14 January 2015 10:10
To The Daily Sun,
Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi. The House Intelligence Committee's final Benghazi report supposedly exonerates our State Department of any wrongdoing. The liberal letter writers to this paper appear absolutely giddy. There, "I told you so" smugness about this "phony scandal" strikes at the heart of the "liberal progressive superiority complex." It also strikes at the heart of all that is decent and necessary for the protection of all who go into harms way to secure our safety and liberty.
Here comes the mainstream media flying above the fray on gossamer wings with their White House coattails flapping in the wind. As Daniel Greenfield notes, "The report concludes that there was no intelligence failure because there was no specific warning that an attack would occur on September 11. Aside from the stream of contradictory and conflicting intelligence afterward." Yet the media reports the findings as though everything is hunky-dory and the left does cartwheels cross the floor.
The "stand down order" has become the Saul Alinsky progressive semantic distraction du jour. We never told the them to "stand down" which means "do nothing" To Tripoli you should go, but to Benghazi, well no. Meanwhile, back on the "keeping it real ranch," the report actually does say that there was inadequate State Department security.
Let's engage in some critical thinking and bona fide research. Those would be the two bullet points that the liberal writers are constantly imploring those on the right to try. I checked out the Daily Signal's "26 Ways the Media Botched Their Reporting on the Latest Benghazi Report." I took a look at the book, "13 Hours" by Mitchell Zuckoff and Mark "OZ" Geist. They were part of the annex security team that survived. Mark has had more than a dozen surgeries with more to come. They were there that night. Lou Dobbs said the book brings to life the horror and carnage of that night. It left him in awe for the heroes, sorrow for the dead and utter disgust for the security breakdown. Mitchell and Mark believe many more lives could have been saved absent the "stand down" orders or rather the orders to be patient and do something else.
In Sharyl Attkisson's book, "Stonewalled," book reviewer Elise Cooper said Sharyl wonders why we (1) still do not know what President Obama was doing during the attack; (2) what decisions did he make while Americans were under attack on foreign soil; (3) why is the White House withholding photos taken at the White House that night and surveillance videos taken in Benghazi that were promised for release; (4) why did they stay so long with the "caused by a video" narrative; (5) why did this administration put our ambassador in harm's way in the first place? Answers to these questions might explain why President Obama felt confident enough to fly to a Vegas fundraiser the next day.
Remarkably, we still cannot get an honest answer from this administration as to how and why the U.S. got involved in Libya in the first place. Please spare me the "Gadhafi imminent bloodbath" scenario falsely proffered by our president. If our commander-in-chief were really compassionately motivated by such reasons, he would have been in involved in the Iranian "green revolution." Democrat Alan Kuperman's book, "The Limits of Humanitarian Intervention" has already debunked that false talking point, according to Jack Cashill.
Finally, Benjamin Weingarten of the Blaze.com asks these questions. 1. Why was the U.S. trusting a group called the February 17th Martyrs Brigade to guard U.S. diplomatic/intelligence personnel in Benghazi? 2. How is it possible that terrorists could storm right through the gates of the U.S. Special Mission and overtake it? 3. Why did Ambassador Stevens' security at the compound consist of only five Diplomatic Security agents with little significant field experience, and eight ultimately ineffectual Libyan guards? 4. Why were the special operators at the CIA annex who were ready to rush to the Special Mission to save Ambassador Stevens and others instructed by the CIA base chief, "Bob" to wait three times while our men languished? 5. Has the government ensured that such glaring security failures will never be made again?
Apparently, Carol Stappi has no such concerns because she seemingly has been convinced that our government acted appropriately during this massacre and will do so again during future massacres by radical Jihadist terrorists. Are you all feeling comforted now?
Elise Cooper states, "If one compares the Obama administration's first accounts of the Benghazi fiasco, the pages from a novel, if you will, to the facts that have trickled out since, the contrast is stark." The Daily Signal mentions, "... although USA Today claimed the committee 'cleared the Obama administration of any wrongdoing,' the actual report makes numerous references to administration officials doing things wrong. Mainstream news reported that Republicans had exonerated the Obama administration on all counts. House Intelligence Chairman Mike Rogers stated in an op-ed on Dec. 10th, "Some have said the report exonerates the State Dept. and the White House. It does not".
I am not the least bit heartened by Carol Stappi's apparent trust in this administration. To the point where she feels confident enough to trash Steve Earle's character after he questions the veracity of these findings. I am however terribly dismayed with the way this administration's clueless foreign policy actions continue to threaten our national security.
Now the dilemma for Henry Osmer. Is it really Russ writing this letter or Steve himself? Only his therapist/psychic/private eye/conspiracy team can know for sure.
Last Updated on Tuesday, 13 January 2015 11:23
To The Daily Sun,
The third annual Gilford Candlelight Stroll has come and gone. Many thanks go to all the many, many volunteers who made it a success. The Gilford Historical Society would like to thank those who volunteered so that our three buildings could be open to welcome visitors.
I will start with those who were in the Rowe House, since that is the building that often seems like my "second home" and where I was. We thank Alexandra Breed and Lauren Siboski for donating their doll houses (I lent mine), Dr. Kelly White for donating her American Girl Doll, and Cindie Graham for lending her dolls so we could have a special exhibit showcasing doll houses and dolls.
We are grateful to Carmel Lancia for creating the beautiful green centerpieces that were on the mantels, to Carol Anderson who helped the children make a candy cane decoration and to Jerry Murphy for playing his guitar and leading us in holiday singing. We thank the members of the Senior Momentum group who diligently worked to string the popcorn (no easy task) and the cranberries that decorated our country-themed tree. They are Joanne Blais, Ginny Brake, Carleen Cornelison, Diana Dufault, Bev Fortson Carol Graves and Kristin Jarvi and Sue King from Parks and Recreation. We also thank Carmel and Tony Lancia, Ann Montminy, Helen Murphy and Rosemary Shannon for welcoming our guests.
At the Meetinghouse, Diane Mitton was aided by Terri Bobseine, Jim Colby, Carolyn Brown, Nan Fay, Anita Hewitt, and Ashley Hewitt. Thanks go to Jane Rollins for decorating the inside of the building with greens and to Bill and Sally Bickford for decorating the outside. Thanks also go to Denise Sanborn and her High School Carolers who came inside to sing. It was gratifying to see so many people/families who came inside to view the historical items that were on display.
The aroma of gingerbread cookies was enticing to many at the Grange, thanks go to Patti Herrick (who lives in Meredith) for making the dough for us and to Kathy Dahll and Jesse Lacombe for baking the cookies in the kitchen. Thanks go to Karin Landry and Rusty Davis who enjoyed greeting our visitors, while Carole Johnson in the Homestead Room and Walt and Shirley Stockwell and Pete and Sue Allen in the Store shared their knowledge with visitors.
It is with a sense of gratitude that we can say that Gilford is a great place to live and we are thankful to all who were willing to work and volunteer their time to help make the Candlelight Stroll so enjoyable.
Gilford Historical Society
Last Updated on Tuesday, 13 January 2015 11:16
To The Daily Sun,
An open letter to Meredith residents:
After much consideration I have decided not to seek re-election to a fourth term as a member of the Meredith Selectboard in the upcoming 2015 Town Elections. With nearly 30 years of service to the residents of Meredith and Inter-Lakes School District it is time to turn "the reins over" to other interested Meredith residents committed to public service and guidance of the future of our wonderful town.
My stewardship as your selectman has been challenging at times but totally overwhelmed by the many opportunities to have served with the most capable administrative team headed by Town Manager Phil Warren and our department leaders team, and of course with the continuous support of all our town employees! Meredith is also very fortunate to have so many capable and dedicated volunteers carrying out the duties of the many boards, committees and positions lending support and guidance to ensuring that Meredith remains such a wonderful place to call home.
I what to thank the Meredith residents for having placed their faith and support in me and to ensure them that it has been an honor and a privilege to have served the Town of Meredith. Without the support of my wife, Laurie, and my family this experience would have not been possible.
Peter F. Brothers
Meredith Board of Selectmen
Last Updated on Tuesday, 13 January 2015 11:13
To The Daily Sun,
I recently read state Sen. Forrester's newsletter about the upcoming budget cycle. Certainly the last budget was a great improvement over the one before that. Sen. Forrester rightly touts its support for higher education, for example. (Yet she must realize constituents do remember her party was in power when all the cuts were made!) The bi-partisan budget corrected some of the worst effects of the prior one and it will likely close in balance. That is all good.
This spring the Legislature must create a new budget to meet the needs of New Hampshire's citizens and businesses. Sen. Forrester, chair of the Senate Budget Committee, has a big role to play. Over the past 14 years our population has grown by 7 percent while revenues have decreased 5 percent.
But New Hampshire's needs have not decreased. Over a third of our roads are in poor condition, as are our bridges. Waits are longer than ever in the courts and state offices. More and more state costs have been transferred to the town or county level, increasing our property taxes tremendously. The future requires investing now!
Sen. Forrester disagreed with my concern expressed at the Meredith forum last fall that New Hampshire has a structural deficit, that there's not enough revenue to meet New Hampshire's needs. She says no, we have a spending problem. Lately she stated lawmakers should not raid the designated funds, fees collected from citizens and set aside for specific purposes. I agree. She must know, however, that so many past legislatures raided them because otherwise there simply was not enough revenue to balance the budget. So where will Sen. Forrester and the Legislature find the revenue to close the gap this time?
Rep. Ames and Sen. Feltes have proposed that the Legislature close some inadvertent tax loopholes. Businesses are converting from corporations to limited liability companies because LLC profits are not currently taxed. Wealthy citizens are creating trusts whose interest and dividends are not subject to tax.
Closing those two loopholes would bring our revenues up without imposing new taxes.
Senator Forrester, please support this proposal.
Last Updated on Tuesday, 13 January 2015 11:10