Letter Submission

To submit a letter to the editor, please email us at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. Letters must contain the author's name, hometown (state as well, if not in New Hampshire) and phone number, but the number will not be published. We do not run anonymous letters. Local issues get priority, as do local writers. We encourage writers to keep letters to no more than 400 words, but will accept longer letters to be run on a space-available basis. Editors reserve the right to edit letters for spelling, grammar, punctuation, excessive length and unsuitable content.


Does Trump really think he can turn back clock on trade conduct?

To The Daily Sun,

What is isolationism? Is it drawing back from trade with those outside our borders? Is it dissolving regional defense commitments? Is it withholding aid to starving people around the world? Is it shutting out those seeking asylum from war-torn areas of the world? I say it is all of the above.

We need to evaluate carefully the responses we make to those beyond our borders.

Shortly, we will be involved in the budget process. It would appear that there is a big push for a significant increase in military spending. Can we justify the outlay for these stated defense priorities, or are we ramping up to another foreign conflict? When you have a strong military, there is a temptation to start acting like the global cop. Victory in conflict is only a part of the problem resolution. Once you remove a tyrant there is an obligation to maintain order in the aftermath. Both the victory and the maintenance of order cost money, lots of it!

As our new secretary of state visits in foreign lands, is his message one that assures both friend and enemy that we come in peace? Or, does he go out to those nations with a threat of sanctions?

Harold Laswell, in his book "World Politics Faces Economics," held that there are four types of statecraft: propaganda, diplomacy, military force and economic statecraft. What can we draw from the Trump/Tillison
performance thus far? Trump certainly understands the use of propaganda. He used it quite well in his presidential campaign. We see that even our allies are confused by his pronouncements. His efforts on the diplomatic scene have, as yet, not been tested. One thing he must not do is work at cross purposes with Rex.

Where the Trump administration may get in the greatest trouble is in the use of military force and economic statecraft. His stated aim in reference to the use of the military is the need to make it stronger so those who oppose America will never do so overtly. If anyone out there really believes that line, we must assume they have slept through the last 50 years.

Trump's ideas relating to economic statecraft aren't very understandable. His "make it in America" philosophy makes less sense than what the British are doing to themselves. Does he really think that we can turn back the clock on how trade is conducted? He is going to find a different kind of wall in China. They will smile politely at him and then completely ignore him. They have been making deals a lot longer than he has. Also, in case he hasn't noticed, China has bought a lot of our paper over the years. Their investment in our borrowing process is well known and may come back to haunt us in the not too distant future. They may do a little economic statecraft of their own; just to calm him down a bit, so to speak.

It will be an interesting year, for sure.

Bill Dawson


  • Category: Letters
  • Hits: 205

Jim Hightower - Real news

A decade ago, some barons of the media establishment designated themselves America's official arbiters of political truth. One of their tools is PolitiFact, a project of the Tampa Bay Times and several other major newspapers, which issues an award for the year's most outrageous falsehood. Last year's election was infested with so much disinformation and dishonesty, however, that PolitiFact's 2016 Lie of the Year was not a single prevarication, but that cluster bomb of whoppers collectively branded "Fake News."

Just as troubling as fake news is the media's systematic omission of grassroots news that people could really use. What's missing is real news of the ordinary Americans in practically every zip code, who are finding innovative solutions to big problems that the elites do nothing about. Uplifting local actions are blooming throughout our land, yet most people are unaware of them or the results: that people and communities everywhere are breaking the corporate chains that shackle them. Here are a few examples:

Inequality. In 2014, American CEOs earned 350 times more than the average worker, creating the world's greatest income gap. Washington's response to the grotesque inequity has been to blow political hot air at it and hope it drifts away. It hasn't. So, in December, the mayor and city council of Portland, Oregon, decided to stop talking about the ever-widening gap and actually try to shrink it. They added a surcharge to the local tax bill of any corporation that gives its top exec more than 100 times the median pay of its rank and-file employees, providing a financial incentive for corporate boards to seek some balance and at least to consider pay fairness. The main sponsor of the provision called it, "The closest thing I'd seen to a tax on inequality itself." The mayor called Portlanders problem solvers willing to tackle big issues and test new ideas that can be adapted and refined by others: "Local action replicated around the country can start to make a difference."

Public Education. With Betsy DeVos, the right-wing ideologue and billionaire Amway heiress, now leading an all-out Trumpster charge to destroy America's public schools and privatize educational opportunity, what chance is there for school kids from low- and middle-income families? Don't despair, for there is hope in local people's common sense commitment to the common good, as presently being demonstrated in San Antonio, Texas. A few years ago, Mayor Julian Castro launched a democratic process for ordinary citizens to decide the best way for the city to invest in its future. After weeks of city-wide conversations, San Antonians chose a single priority: Invest in our children's future by expanding quality, full-day, pre-kindergarten education for more of the city's children. This was no small task, for the government of this extremely rich state is run by boneheaded tea-party Republicans who constantly shortchange our public-school system and refuse to fund more than half-day pre-K programs. So where to get the money? The people did what the anti-public-school halfwits said would never happen — they taxed themselves, voting for a 1/8th of a cent sales tax hike that put $31 million a year into the successful experiment called Pre-K 4 SA. San Antonians recognize the wisdom of the old bumper sticker: "If you think educations is expensive, try ignorance."

Corporate Power. Trump and his like-minded Congress critters are gearing up to unleash corporate profiteers from practically all restraints that protect us ordinary people, our natural resources, and even our core values from their greed. But they might want to ponder how North Dakota voters reacted to a similar power play last year. At issue was a monumental 1932 state law that bans nonfamily corporate farm ownership, reflecting the people's desire to maintain family farms, healthy rural communities, and sustainable agriculture practices. Nostalgic hogwash, growled Big Ag lobbyists, who got obsequious legislators and the corporate-funded governor to overturn the eight-decade-old ban on industrial ag. In turn, progressive forces, led by the North Dakota Farmers Union, plowed the grassroots, recruiting volunteers to put on last June's ballot a referendum giving common voters the final say. And speak they did, loud and clear: 76 percent of North Dakotans rejected the corporate powers and the politicos who served them, restoring the outright ban on corporate-controlled farming.

These "real news" stories show that it is possible to build progressive power in cities and the states. The Institute for Local Self-Reliance is a tremendous resource for communities that want to build their economies in ways that nurture people instead of giant, far-removed corporations.

(Jim Hightower has been called American's most popular populist. The radio commentator and former Texas Commissioner of Agriculture is author of seven books, including "There's Nothing In the Middle of Road but Yellow Stripes and Dead Armadillos" and his new work, "Swim Against the Current: Even Dead Fish Can Go With The Flow".)

  • Category: Letters
  • Hits: 270