Don't want to be left with consequences

To The Daily Sun,

Moving to New Hampshire 17 years ago provided the opportunity to live a more desired lifestyle. My husband and I both have stressful, demanding careers and living in a rural New Hampshire community gave us the balance we sought. We love the mountains, lakes and wildlife that surround us. While we have never been politically minded, nor did we want to be, issues involving our town compelled us to take a closer look and get involved.

Industrial wind turbines are targeted for our town. Monstrosities that would tower nearly 500 feet tall. These projects will decrease property values, change the landscape, destroy our beautiful ridge lines, pollute the watersheds, displace wildlife and kill birds. Most recently, the northern long-eared bat was put on the threatened species list. The industrial wind turbine project would infringe upon their habitat. Can we afford to lose an entire species? Do people realize how vital bats are to the environment and the balance of nature?

How can this happen? Well, these corporations have been subsidized by the federal government with our tax dollars to promote sustainable energy. Industrial wind turbines in the Northeast are not sustainable, and studies have indicated this time and time again. However, our representatives in Concord are not listening. This has prompted my town and several other communities in New Hampshire to pass a Rights Based Ordinance (RBO). This declares our right to local self government and puts the rights of the people over the rights of large corporations.

The RBO is based on our state Constitution. Citizens have rights. We don't want to be bullied. We don't want to be left with the consequences of failed projects, projects that have not proven to be even close to providing sustainable energy. They have only proven to cost an exorbitant amount of taxpayers' money with the energy being exported out of state and the profits stuffing foreign companies' pockets. I urge your readers to get involved. The future of our beautiful state is at stake. Don't allow corporate greed to take over our local communities and do irreparable harm.

Sue Ozkan
CARE Group


  • Category: Letters
  • Hits: 141

No thanks, I will stick with party that works for all our citizens

To The Daily Sun,

To answer or not to answer that was my question. I am talking about Don Ewing's letter in The Laconia Sun on April 9 referring to a letter I wrote regarding the N.H. Republican House of Representatives vote to discontinue Medicaid (expansion). Despite the fact it is covering health care for almost 40,000 New Hampshire residents that never had health insurance before it is working both by keeping people healthy as well as its economic impact.

Hospital emergency rooms have seen significant savings, which points to the fact that these newly insured are now going to doctors' offices as their first line of defense just like those of us who have been fortunate enough to have health insurance.

In just one paragraph of his long, uninformed letter he stated, "If you believe all of Trombi's and her fellow travelers' predictions of doom and gloom, then tens of thousands of us should have died of starvation, cold, lack of medical care, accidents from bad roads and bridges, etc." So yes Don, they won't be dying from lack of medical care now.

There are any number of programs started by various presidents that continue today that have enormously impacted the greater good which include Social Security, the interstate highway system, Medicare, Medicaid, and the Affordable Care Act.

As far as your offer to me and other Democrats to join the Tea Party, no thanks. I will stick to the one I know that has accomplished and governs not only with critical and thoughtful thinking but works for all citizens' young and old alike and for those who truly need the help of government where in most circumstances because of a blip in their lives need short term help be it the loss of a job, illness, mental health challenges, and or learning disabilities.

Paula Trombi


  • Category: Letters
  • Hits: 145

Pres. Lincoln died from assassan's bullet 150 years ago today

To The Daily Sun,

April 15th marks the 150th anniversary of the death of Abraham Lincoln. The president was mortally wounded on Friday, April 14, 1865, at Ford's Theater in Washington when he was shot behind his left ear by John Wilkes Booth. President Lincoln was carried across the street where he died at 7:22 a.m., on Saturday morning, April 15th. His assassination came only five days after Confederate General Robert E. Lee surrendered his army at Appomatix Court House, Virginia, effectively ending the American Civil War.

The death of the president was a great shock to the nation and its impact was felt in every community, including those in the Lakes Region.

The president's passing was formally recognized by the members of the Belknap County Bar Association. This association was formed in March 1865 when the Belknap County lawyers came together at the County Court House and established the association which continues to this day. The first recorded meeting occurred on March 27, 1865. A special meeting of the Belknap County Bar Association was held on April 17, 1865, at which time it was "voted that a committee of three be appointed by the president to make arrangements relative to a proper observance of the death of President Lincoln and to draft resolutions".

The original record book of the association contained the signatures of the lawyers who initially formed the association in 1865. Belknap County lawyers have continued to sign the original record book since 1865. The tradition continues to this day as does the association's tradition of service to the communities in the Lakes Region.

Rod Dyer
Wescott Law Firm

  • Category: Letters
  • Hits: 195

Those of us who believe in reality & facts will just keep countering

To The Daily Sun,

Danger alert. The aliens with their tinfoil hats and crooked antennas are back. They are again flooding the letters pages with more hatred, lies and outright deceit.

It is troubling to read their vile, offensive and vitriolic attacks. They are trying to scare us into believing that we are in imminent danger from so very many sources, here are but a few of their favorite bogeymen:

1. Lesbian and gay people.

2. President Obama.

3. The poor.

4. Nuclear annihilation.

5. Their imagined loss of religious freedom.

6. Hillary Clinton.

Their anger (or is it paranoia?) is very transparent. They are bold and audacious. What are we to expect next? Will they bring other aliens to earth and release them from their pods to spread more lies? Should we build bunkers to protect ourselves against the impending disasters they believe are imminent? Should we stockpile food and water if we should have to hide away for a very long time? Are they going to give us enough warning when we have to "take cover"?

Or better yet, do those of us who believe in reality and facts just keep countering their fairy tales and fear mongering? The world is not coming to an end. The lesbian-gay-bisexual and transgender community is not a threat. Most of them whom I've had the pleasure to know in my long lifetime are productive citizens, living their lives in a caring, kind way. President Obama can hold his own, and keep on doing the right thing for our country. Our religious freedoms are firmly in place and maybe the Lord will one day show the "Chicken Littles" that they don't have to worry.

Hillary Clinton will be nominated for president and will be able to counter all of the arguments of those with a tenuous grasp on reality.

As to nuclear annihilation, we must ask this very important question. Do we really want to end all civilization on this planet earth with a few nuclear bombs or do we want our leaders to keep negotiating? Even that noted non-pacifist Winston Churchill said that it is "better to jaw, jaw, than to war, war." Remember the last time a president decided to blindly go to war based on fantasies and self-constructed falsehoods? We're still paying the price and will be for a long time.

Bernadette Loesch


  • Category: Letters
  • Hits: 146

Indiana law has nothing to do with religious freedom as a right

To The Daily Sun,

Mr. Ewing just can't help trying to con us by wrapping himself in artificial victimhood. As for my analysis of him, I'll go biblical: "By their fruits you shall know them;" in Mr. Ewing's case a never-ending crop of sour grapes flavored by fantasies, fanned by his ravings about an imaginary "war on Christianity" and by his twisting the meaning of religious freedom.

He apparently can't stop his misleading claims about Indiana's law. The federal RFRA of 1993 does require a "substantial burden". Indiana's did not. It only required that someone believe that their religious freedom was "likely" to be violated. That is a major difference, especially to those able to comprehend the English language. If he also thinks that Indiana's law had nothing to do with gay people he's blatantly ignoring the openly expressed motivation of those who pushed for such a bill, and he must have not listened to the debate in the Legislature, where complaints about gay rights and marriage equality were front and center.

And if he thinks that Christians would happily go to other businesses if non-Christians refused to serve them, he's living in fantasy land. I suspect that he would be among the first to pound out indignant protests if that happened throughout a state. This is not just about wedding cakes or pizza. It involves any provider: hotels, restaurants, stores and anyone who opens for business. Mr. Ewing dismissively suggests that customers refused service just "go elsewhere". That attitude is the same as the segregationist playbook in the pre civil-rights South. "Your kind isn't welcome to eat here, go find another restaurant." And once again, not only LGBT people, but anyone who a business owner feels is sinful or offensive, could be denied service. Everyone could pick the "sin", and the "sinner" to turn away.

When a business, not run by a religious group, opens to the public it is obligated to follow the same laws as every other business. That's not unfair discrimination, it's equal treatment. The Supreme Court has consistently held that laws may prohibit religiously motivated actions, as opposed to beliefs. It has said that when "followers of a particular sect enter into commercial activity as a matter of choice, the limits they accept on their own conduct as a matter of conscience and faith are not to be superimposed on ... others in that activity. Creating an exemption ... operates to impose [that follower's] religious faith on [others]." (United States v. Lee).

Religious freedom is indeed a fundamental right. Indiana's law had little to do with that. If there's a brouhaha, it was created by those whose religious liberty is not hindered at all. They have, and have always had, full freedom to practice their religion without interference. They are trying to use "religious freedom" as a smokescreen to impose their dogmas on others and exclude anyone who doesn't follow their beliefs. They have the notion that if they do not have the right to make everyone else bow to their beliefs then you are attacking those beliefs or taking away their religious freedom. Claims that they are being forced to violate their religion are simply not true.

We should wonder where in the Bible it says that Christians shall not serve gay people (or anyone else). This is simple discrimination trying to hide behind a cross. It's an attempt to twist the rhetoric of freedom in order to take away others' rights. It tries to gain exemptions from basic laws and to have government privilege their beliefs over those of others. Beliefs that belong to their version of Christianity. They don't speak for those Christians or churches and denominations that support equal treatment under the law. But they do demand special rights for discrimination disguised as a religious right.

Supporting for equal treatment in public life is not an attack on religious freedom. And Mr. Ewing is not defending the Constitution or our freedoms. He is shilling for a thinly-veiled theocracy.

Ed Allard


  • Category: Letters
  • Hits: 119