Letter Submission

To submit a letter to the editor, please email us at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. Letters must contain the author's name, hometown (state as well, if not in New Hampshire) and phone number, but the number will not be published. We do not run anonymous letters. Local issues get priority, as do local writers. We encourage writers to keep letters to no more than 400 words, but will accept longer letters to be run on a space-available basis. Editors reserve the right to edit letters for spelling, grammar, punctuation, excessive length and unsuitable content.


Preposterious that little town of 2,800 has a budget of $3.9 million

To The Daily Sun,

Some of the people of the town of Sanbornton want to have services like those of the big cities where many of them come from. Sanbornton is a rural town. Most of the residents have been here most of their lives, and do not want liberal changes which cost so much that many of the lifelong residents are thinking about selling and moving to a town with a lower tax rate. There is no need for that. Why are we chasing our older citizens out of town?

I am voting for Dave Nickerson for selectman because he has many years of experience as our selectman, and would like to keep Sanbornton's rural character. He loves our town, and can identify problems before they get out of hand. We need to put a cap on spending, at least during town meetings.

According to The Daily Sun article, our operating budget is $3,863,829 for only 2,800 residents. That's preposterous!

Please vote your pocketbook on Tuesday and keep a conservative on our Selectboard.

Peggy Graham

  • Category: Letters
  • Hits: 176

About 6% of Ashland voters typically participate in our Town Meeting

To The Daily Sun,

The 2008 town warrant listed Article 12, by petition. Is asks, shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 40:13 (known as SB-2)? Passage requires a three-fifths majority. The vote was very close but failed to achieve the 3/5 majority.

Yes 362 No 263 Votes needed to achieve three-fifths majority 375 — just 14 votes short.
To quote former selectmen Bruce Van Derven (2007 executive summary report). "The core problem that has confronted the Selectboard for decades is "voter turnout."

Election Day and Town Meeting are the two days when the taxpaying residents have the ultimate power of deciding what we do over the coming years. Unfortunately, too many voters have passed up voting, and an even greater number have decided against having their say at Town Meeting.
The following year, 2008 petition warrant Article 30, proposed moving Town Meeting to Saturday. The hope was that by moving town meeting to Saturday it would help increase voter turnout. The motion passed, but the expected increase in turnout did not materialize.

So here we are 10 years later and Town Meeting attendance is averaging about 130 voters, including elected officials (about 6 percent of the 2,200 registered voters).

The problem with town meeting, the purest form of democracy?

• Low turnout with just a majority of 130 voters on average at town meeting making multimillion-dollar decisions.
• Warrant articles tabled or passed over so NO vote taken.
• Lots of time-consuming secret ballots.

SB-2 addresses these concerns, but preserves the tradition of Town Meeting by having a deliberative sessions.

• Session 1 — a public meeting to discuss and amend the proposed warrant,
• Session 2 — to vote on the warrant at the polls.

The average voter turnout on Election Day is about 600 voters. If SB-2 is adopted this will equate to approximately 30 percent of 2,200 registered voters taking part in the process. Whatever way you vote when the majority speaks that is the right answer.

Don't forget to vote on Tuesday, March 14, at the Old Town Hall and please attend Town Meeting at the Newfound Regional High School on Saturday, March 18.

Paul Manganiello

  • Category: Letters
  • Hits: 185