To The Daily Sun,
The elections of 2014 have come and gone and we all have our thoughts about the outcomes.
All races have their particular demands and surprises, but nothing is more rewarding than the help and support of volunteers and voters. Without you our democracy would suffer and our diverse voices would not be heard.
During this race I had folks encourage me, put up signs, create palm cards, prepare postcards for mailing, stand on corners, transfer stations and polling sites holding signs, contribute to the costs of the race, prepare food for volunteers, knock on doors and vote.
Our elections need to be more than mailboxes stuffed with printed material. The outreach of candidates makes a difference and acknowledges the value of individual participation. It is important that the candidates who won continue to reach out to their constituents. The more informed we become the more participatory we might be. Citizen participation is what will keep our democracy strong.
I thank you for all your efforts on my behalf and thank all the folks I met along the way who greeted me kindly despite our possible differences.
Last Updated on Tuesday, 25 November 2014 10:28
To The Daily Sun,
An open letter to Laconia City Manager Scott Myers:
First: For a reason unknown you have responded to my request which was properly directed to the council's clerk, who records minutes. Moreover, council minutes are retained in the City Clerk department.
Second, you confirmed that that two non-public meetings took place, in October, in which the Belknap Mill Trustees participated.
What is not stated is the date of those meetings, when and where those two meeting notices were posted or under what exception the meetings were held out of public view?
Third, the subject matter for those meetings clearly was the "resources" to maintain the Belknap Mill.
Fourth, As a result of those non-public meetings, decisions were made, otherwise the mayor would not have been able to make a public announcement "that the trustees have decided, declared, that they no longer view themselves as viable owners of the building."
Fifth, in your reply to my RSA 91-A request you provided no dates for either meeting. I have a right to know the place, date and time the non-public meetings took place. A public record shall exist as to when the council convened the time it voted to enter non-public meeting and furthermore, if any decisions were made.
Sixth, a decision to delegate the mayor as spokesperson for the Belknap Mill Society's Board of Directors had to have taken place. Otherwise, the mayor divulged privileged information, placing the City of Laconia in harm's way for making public information that was unknown to Belknap Mill Society members, of which I am a member. The general membership was never informed of the financial plight. To my knowledge, the "members" have taken no vote directing the directors to take any action regarding the sale of the Belknap Mill located at 25 Beacon Street East.
In fact the day prior to the mayor's announcement, the president of the board of trustees, "said that the society is concerned for the future of the mill and is "looking for a partner to work with us to preserve this iconic and historical gem."
Moreover, the mayor or the president of the Belknap Mill Society said nothing about the sale of the building.
Therefore, the exception RSA 91-A:,II (d) (Consideration of the acquisition, sale or lease of real or personal property which, if discussed in public, would likely benefit a party or parties whose interests are adverse to those of the general community) is not applicable.
Neither is RSA 91-A:3, II (e) (Consideration or negotiation of pending claims or litigation which has been threatened in writing or filed against the body or agency or any subdivision thereof, or against any member thereof because of his membership in such body or agency, until the claim or litigation has been fully adjudicated or otherwise settled) applicable.
I find no exception per RSA 91-A: II for negotiation regarding a "partnership."
Accordingly, the three non-public meetings on Oct. 14, 2014, or Oct. 27, 2014, could not have been with regards to the Belknap Mill building.
Your response does not rise to the level of an acceptable reply. What is the date of the "private" meetings with the Board of Directors?
Furthermore, for the mayor and council to schedule a public hearing regarding any public building for any non-profit organization, base on "private information," is simply wrong. The taxpayers of the city cannot be forced to become a financial partner. If the intention is to encumber tax dollars, as it did with the Colonial Theater, this endeavor is simply wrong. If any decision based on the two non-public meetings leading to the public hearing, that decision shall be a violation of the Right-to-Know law.
Thomas A. Tardif
Last Updated on Monday, 24 November 2014 10:36
To The Daily Sun,
Just a word or two about L.J. Siden's protestation as to this nation not being a Christian nation. He quotes "Roger Williams, the founder of the colony of Rhode Island, argued that religious freedom is itself a Christian principle. Any attempt to establish a "Christian Nation," therefore, always has been and always will be unjust, dangerous and profoundly un-Christian." He and Roger Williams are in error to assume that we shouldn't be, are not — as they say religious freedom is itself a Christian principle. Therefore that this nation's First Amendment establishes religion freedom, first and foremost — which as they point out is a Christian principle — we therefore are indeed a Christian nation. Our form of government is a constitutional republic and its first principle of the rights of its citizens is a Christian principle one would commonly agree our foundation is Christian.
For what reason one must argue time and time again to deny the values upon which the nation was founded I really find to be sad, just the fact that one may so argue publicly should alert one to appreciate those values.
Our founding Fathers were not radical liberal progressives, they were in one word "conservatives" — sorry Siden.
They fought to preserve their rights of common law and the Magna Carta which the liberal progressive king and his Parliament were seeking to strip from the English colonists.
Last Updated on Monday, 24 November 2014 10:31
To The Daily Sun,
Bravo President Obama — for issuing an executive order on immigration after years of obstructionism by the Congress. The House has had over 500 days to take a vote on the bipartisan immigration reform bill passed by the Senate — but Speaker Boehner won't allow a vote, though most reporters agree the House would have passed the Senate bill, making the president's executive order unnecessary. And the House could still pass this Senate bill, which would supersede the president's executive order.
Now the Republicans seem to be throwing a tantrum, annoyed that they are unable to succeed at stalling any meaningful action on immigration reform.
As conservative legal scholar Eric Posner (University of Chicago) wrote in the New York Times on Nov. 18, the Constitution clearly gives the President "executive power" — which, as Posner wrote, "has always been understood to include the discretionary power to allocate resources among enforcement efforts."
While some on the right have been whining about the number of executive orders President Obama has issued, it might be useful to review the facts. The numbers are available to all on the Website of the American Presidency Project at the University of California, Santa Barbara (http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/data/orders.php ). Their chart (updated every month) lists the numbers of executive orders from Presidents Washington to Obama. On the chart are both the total number of orders issued and the average number per year in office. Looking at this latter number (updated through Oct. 20, 2014), President Obama has the lowest average of orders per year (33.57) since the first term of Grover Cleveland (1885-89), whose average orders per year was 28.25.
Looking at the total number of executive orders issued for some recent Presidents, Reagan issued 381, George W. Bush issued 291, and President Obama has so far issued 193.
Last Updated on Monday, 24 November 2014 10:27
To The Daily Sun,
After reading the front page (11/18/14) on the three men charged with shooting heroin, and seeing their age, I could only say, "You're old enough to know better." But they say opium addition is a dark cloud that will follow you the rest of your life.
I grew up in the late sixties, early seventies, when heroin was an epidemic. I lost a couple of friends to a heroin overdose. They way I would mourn their loss and serve as a constant reminder not to go down that road, was a song by the artist Neil Young. The last verse was, "I've seen the needle and the damage done, a little part of it in every one, but every junkie is like a setting sun."
God bless those who have broken the chains of heroin addiction, and God help those who have not.
Last Updated on Monday, 24 November 2014 10:19