Letter Submission

To submit a letter to the editor, please email us at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. Letters must contain the author's name, hometown (state as well, if not in New Hampshire) and phone number, but the number will not be published. We do not run anonymous letters. Local issues get priority, as do local writers. We encourage writers to keep letters to no more than 400 words, but will accept longer letters to be run on a space-available basis. Letters may be edited for spelling, grammar, punctuation and legal concerns.

 

1 bath & 1 BR is same as 50 baths & 1 BR: why the 'fireworks'?

To The Daily Sun,

This is in regards to the article written (April 12), regarding Gilmanton's land use technician and building inspector's decision to deny a permit for the addition of a bathroom.

Septic systems are initially determined by the number of proposed bedrooms and then designed according to soil and site conditions. In my 40 years as a builder I have never heard of bathrooms being a factor in the design. Established codes, performance requirements and even common sense dictate that if you have one bedroom and let's say one bathroom, your waste flow is generally considered to be from two people.

To underscore the point, if you had 50 bathrooms and one bedroom you're still not impacting your septic system any differently than if you only had one bathroom — there would just be 50 different choices of where the two people can, ahem ... do their business.

Selectman Jean of course was correct in his assessment, as was Carolyn Baldwin in stating that this was not a decision he could or even should have been asked to make. In fact, unless there were good grounds to suspect the bathroom may have included the addition of a bedroom, this was a matter that should have easily been handled by the technician/inspector. That's what they're paid to do.

How "fireworks" (as the article stated) can erupt, and — "everyone and their mother" — can become involved in an issue that I have seen handled seamlessly so many times ... is beyond me.

Al Blake
Gilmanton

  • Category: Letters
  • Hits: 416

N.H. House sergeant-at-arms is either a moron or a Democrat

To The Daily Sun,

Portable oxygen concentrators are not oxygen tanks and do not pose a hazard to safety. They are approved by the FAA for use on aircraft, and were, in fact, developed for this purpose so that people who need a constant supply of oxygen could travel by air. As a retired flight attendant I am familiar with these devices. Believe me, if they were not 100 percent safe the FAA would not have approved them.

Unlike oxygen tanks, which can explode, a concentrator does not contain oxygen but instead extracts oxygen from the air. These devices are a godsend to those who suffer from COPD, etc. as they allow them to participate fully in society.

Apparently the sergeant-at-arms in the state Legislature is, at best, ill-informed, and worst either a moron or a Democrat who would go to any lengths to keep a Republican out of the assembly. (One would hope that is not the case.)

State Rep. Ernie Bridge is owed an apology and should not be barred from the Statehouse.

D.M. Williamson

Laconia

  • Category: Letters
  • Hits: 354