Letter Submission

To submit a letter to the editor, please email us at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. Letters must contain the author's name, hometown (state as well, if not in New Hampshire) and phone number, but the number will not be published. We do not run anonymous letters. Local issues get priority, as do local writers. We encourage writers to keep letters to no more than 400 words, but will accept longer letters to be run on a space-available basis. Letters may be edited for spelling, grammar, punctuation and legal concerns.

 

Cruz poses biggest threat to big government & the wealth it bestows

To The Daily Sun,

Big government gobbles increasing amounts of people's money, freedoms, and opportunities, which politicians use to enhance their power and wealth and to provide privileges to themselves (e.g., Obamacare exemption) and favored special interests (e.g., subsidies, regulations, tax loopholes).

Our nation's founders knew that the bigger the government, the smaller the citizen. The Constitution they created, and approved by the people's state representatives, authorized a small federal government with strictly limited powers for the purpose of protecting people's rights, property, and opportunities.

The benefit of this small, limited government was demonstrated during the first half of our nation's existence. We had a real citizen government. Congressmen typically served less than two terms. During that short period of tremendous growth and change, the American people created the largest, freest, and wealthiest middle class in the world.

In the early 20th Century, politicians decided to ignore the Constitution so they could use government to "do good" (especially for themselves). The big government they created (seven to eight times large compared to GDP) has enabled senators and congressmen to become wealthy during long careers in Washington dispensing benefits to appreciative special interests, at the expense of the American peoples' wealth, freedom, and opportunities. The Obama administration clearly reveals the results of big government. Most Americans suffer while the politicians and special interests flourish.

Constitutional conservatives fight to return to the small limited government envisioned by our founders that enable the American people to be free and prosper.

Big government beneficiaries will do anything to protect their wealth and power. By using negative sounding labels (e.g., extreme conservative, hard-liner, inflexible, arch-conservative, extreme right-winger, etc.) to slander constitutional conservatives, they hope to convince Americans to approve of their taking your money, freedoms, and opportunities.

How much/many of your wealth, freedoms, and opportunities, and those of your children and grandchildren, are you willing to give up so the politicians can grow powerful and wealthy? If you want government "of, by and for the people" rather than government "of, by and for the politicians and the special interests," then we need to elect constitutional conservatives.

Ted Cruz is the most consistent constitutional conservative presidential candidate. He has been true to his campaign promises, fought the Washington political establishment, and has been fighting to restore constitutional government.

Cruz is vilified by the Washington political establishments and the special interests because he poses the biggest threat to big government and the wealth and power it bestows on the politicians and special interests.

New Hampshire citizens who want government to work for them rather than the politicians and special interests need to unite behind and vote for Ted Cruz.

Don Ewing
Meredith

  • Category: Letters
  • Hits: 177

Actually, Cruz is one of the least erratic people in American politics

To The Daily Sun,

There is a misconception that Ted Cruz is a fire-breathing extremist. He is a polarizing figure perceived as a hard-line conservative. By casting himself as someone outside the GOP establishment, to the right of his colleagues, he has fostered the perception. He campaigned in 2012 as an insurgent and has staged numerous fights in Congress, in opposition to the "Washington Cartel."

There's no question that Cruz is a conservative but he's not as extreme or ideological as people assume. He's for states' rights, and for all the Constitution. He will not allow gay bashing or let anybody do jihad on the Christians. He is contemptuous of conservatives who assert principled convictions they do nothing to advance. He has said, "In any two-party system you welcome people with a variety of views..." Cruz does not cast his opponents as evil or stupid. His provocations are far more subtle.

The perception that he is a ferocious hard-liner serves his interests, and he's not likely to dispute it. But fielding questions, his answers are more nuanced than his reputation suggests. As the campaign goes on he is likely to devote more attention to issues such as economic opportunity.

Cruz is not a wild-eyed maniac nor is the misconception that Cruz is unstable, erratic, or even unhinged correct. He has called the characterizations part of a critique by the mainstream media. What's ironic is that Cruz is one of the least erratic people in national politics. The oddities in his behavior are strategic rather than spontaneous. Both his composure and calm are striking.

He remains even-tempered at all times, even in unscheduled potentially charged encounters. Ten months into a grueling campaign, under intense media scrutiny and while being attacked from all directions, Cruz has remained focused and unruffled. If anything, his preternatural self-possession is the most unsettling thing about him.

Cruz is smarter than the average bear. He has the kind of intelligence that is universally recognized. That is not to say he holds himself out as superior or that Americans should follow blindly. He doesn't consider himself as always right. When kCruz says or does something that doesn't make sense to me, I find myself asking what I'm missing, taking a step back and rethinking why this person, with strategic objectives, would do that.

Cruz is meticulous with his words. He was a champion debater in college and now he's an unusually good speaker, a talent which will serve him in the general election. He's intelligent, thoughtful, disciplined and on message. He has an unusual expertise with and commitment to constitutional issues. Cruz is fiscally conservative, socially conservative, and pragmatic rather than ideological.

Cruz really is into the Constitution. He has it memorized. He's studied the "Federalist Papers." His thesis, at Princeton, was about the historical and theoretical underpinnings of the Ninth and Tenth Amendments. After attending law school, at Harvard, he landed clerkships in a federal appeals court, then at the Supreme Court. Whatever one may conclude of his plans, ultimately it is only reasonable to conclude they are constrained by his own commitment to the U.S. Constitution.

That's why I get off the couch to campaign for the man. He has done for the people of Texas what he said he will do. Integrity in D.C. is in short supply.

Marc Abear

Meredith

  • Category: Letters
  • Hits: 194