Thanks for your interest in Motorcycle Wee & our Nov. 11 forum

To The Daily Sun,

On behalf of the Laconia Motorcycle Week Association, we would like to thank everyone who attended the public forum on Nov. 11 at the Official Meetinghouse of New Hampshire, the Belknap Mill. We'd also like to extend our gratitude to our event emcee, Pat Kelly, and to all of the media personnel who covered the event, including Bob Daniels and Denise Beaushaine who volunteered their time to film the event on behalf of the Laconia Motorcycle Week Association, to be aired on Lakes Region Public Access, Channel 26.

Tasty treats and beverages were graciously made and donated by Hope Makris, Annie's Catering, Pepsi, and Faro Italian Grille. The association also sincerely thanks Major Conte of the State Police, Chief Adams of the Laconia Police Department and Chief Erickson of the Laconia Fire Department for being available throughout the evening to answer questions related to public safety and law enforcement.

The event provided an opportunity for community members, business owners, and residents to ask questions, raise concerns, and offer feedback regarding all aspects of Motorcycle Week.

For those of you who would like to remain informed about the outcome of this and future forums or who would like to volunteer time serving on various event and marketing committees, please contact Charlie or Jennifer at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. or call them at 603-366-2000.

Charlie St. Clair & Jennifer Anderson
Laconia Motorcycle Week Association

  • Category: Letters
  • Hits: 49

Open you eyes America; Paris is foreshadowing of what's to come

To The Daily Sun,

Hijra is the Arabic word for mass migration to spread Islam.

Brigitte Gabrielle is a Lebanese Christian whose family was abused in Lebanon, because they were Christian, and eventually had to escape. She knows first hand what it's like to live in a Muslim country, being an infidel. She is taking her message all over the world to warn others what is coming. She has formed an organization called Act for America which can be found online, and lets people know how to contact their representatives regarding the refugee immigration problem in our country.

She says, "A refugee invasion is currently taking place in Europe and transforming the continent into Eurabia right before our very eyes.

Each day we see more of the devastating impact that hundreds of thousands of Syrian refugees are having in welcoming countries. Many of these "refugees" are neither Syrian nor refugees. Many of them do not even speak Arabic, cannot tell you where they came from in Syria, and have no official documents. They make up their own names and there is no way to accurately vet them.

They are Afghans fleeing the Taliban, Eritreans fleeing their own oppressive government, and many thousands more hail from Iraq, Pakistan, and sub-Saharan Africa.

This is but a foreshadowing of what will take place in our nation soon, if our government is foolish enough to follow suit — and President Obama and his administration already have announced plans to increase the number of refugees accepted by the U.S. to at least 100,000 next year.

We must stop this insanity. If the citizens of this nation band together to speak a resounding "NO" to our elected officials — we can."

I urge you to check out her website; Act for America, and open your eyes.

Peggy Graham


  • Category: Letters
  • Hits: 108

The Tea Party is critical of bad Republican & Democratic officials

To The Daily Sun,
I was happy to hear from Bernadette Loesch's Nov. 11 letter that she is concerned for American workers. But, her concern seems false considering the politicians and the policies that she adamantly supports and defends. What could she have imagined the consequences would be of killing millions of American jobs with excessive regulations, bureaucratic delays, and taxes, of flooding the labor markets with immigrants (legal and illegal) driving down wages and making available jobs scarce, of raising the minimum wage which is already an obstacle to people wanting that critical first job, the job needed to lead to even better jobs?

Did Loesch think that providing major obstacles to getting a decent job would make life easier and healthier for people wanting to support themselves and their families? The politicians and policies she supports, defends, and promotes are the direct cause of the poverty, despair, alcoholism, drug addiction, family breakups, deaths, etc. that she complains about.

Loesch and the article (recommended: she quotes incorrectly attribute the harmful effects of these policies to capitalism. But, these are not the result of capitalism, they are result of something we politely call crony capitalism. But what it really is is corruption, embezzlement, theft, bribery, fraud, etc. In any job other than politics, employees who use their position or the assets of their employer for their own benefit against the direction and against the best interests of the employers would be fired, sued, and/or prosecuted for their crimes and probably imprisoned.

The Americans who have the hardest time making a decent living also have the highest unemployment rate are the more poorly educated Americans. Most illegal aliens compete with these Americans in the same job market, depressing wages and taking jobs. The other 40 percent of illegal aliens overstayed their visas, broke their promises to return home, and typically compete for jobs with more educated Americans. Throw in about another million legal immigrants annually and it is clear why Americans have trouble getting good jobs and why their wages are low and stagnant.

But toleration of/encouragement for illegal and excessive immigration is only one of many ways that politicians trade away the best interests of most Americans to enhance their personal power and/or fortunes. Examples include the thousands of pages of annual new regulations which benefit specific companies, industries, unions, and/or other special interest groups; subsidies for politically favored businesses which hinders development or expansion of businesses that may have better solutions. The myriad of federal, state, county, and local agencies, bureaus, taxes, permits, etc. make it extremely difficult for businesses to start, expand, or even survive.

For example, it may take years to get approval to build a factory in the U.S. that could be approved and built in the Far East in a month or two. The result is that fewer American businesses are being started now than are being shut down, for the first time in over 30 years. (Note also that the cost of all these obstacles not only kills jobs but they drive up the cost of goods, services, and government (taxes) increasing the struggles of most Americans, especially poorer Americans.)

Despite all the promises of helping poor and middle-income Americans, President Obama's policies have made the rich much richer, but the rest of us much poorer. His policies have killed many thousands of good jobs in coal and lead mining, uranium refining, energy generation, manufacturing and other industries. He has turned thousands of full-time jobs into part-time jobs. And his regulatory and tax policies have prevented the creation of many more jobs. The median income is down nearly $3,000. The percent of working age Americans with jobs is the lowest in decades. More people are long-term unemployed and under-employed than in many decades. More people receive public assistance than ever before. Youth unemployment, especially minority youth unemployment, is high and will rise if the minimum wage increases because youths can typically provide little value to employers.

For the first time ever more Americans expect that their children will have fewer opportunities, be less successful, and be less free than they have been. These are the direct results of the policies implemented by politicians like President Obama, and Bernadette Loesch supports them all.

The Tea Party stands in stark contrast to this. The Tea Party is non-partisan, critical of bad Republican and Democratic politicians and policies alike. The Tea Party began and grew under the presidency of George Bush in reaction to the excessive spending, immoral excessive debt, bailouts, and efforts to reward and encourage more illegal immigration. The Tea Party opposes crony capitalism in all forms, including subsidies, bailouts, and preferential legislation or regulations. The Tea Party opposes both Democratic and Republican politicians who have broken their campaign promises and sold out the people for their personal benefit. The Tea Party is for the rule of law equally applied to all and limited constitutional government responsive to the people, not the special interests. The Tea Party advocates for capitalism which benefits everyone and against crony capitalism which only benefits the politicians and special interests. This is why the Tea Party is hated by both the Republican and Democratic Party establishments and people who care more about partisan objectives than the good of the American people.

Join a Tea Party and help restore government of, by, and for the people.

Don Ewing

  • Category: Letters
  • Hits: 252

Young addicts feel no hope & need a hand up, not another kick

To The Daily Sun,

Governor Maggie Hassan has called an emergency session of the New Hampshire State Legislature this Thursday to address our state's opioid/heroin crisis. According to Gov. Hassan, "People are dying nearly every day in New Hampshire from the heroin and opioid epidemic, and we all need to work together on a comprehensive approach to strengthen our efforts to combat this crisis and save lives." As most of you know, our own city of Laconia is one of the New Hampshire communities that is struggling the most with this heroin epidemic. In addition to calling this emergency legislative session, Governor Hassan has proposed what she claims is a comprehensive legislative proposal to address this crisis.

Yet, Gov. Hassan's proposed legislation fails to address the most urgent problem related to the opioid crisis. There is a currently a five-month waiting period for anyone struggling with a chemical dependency problem to access inpatient chemical dependency treatment and detox in the state of New Hampshire because our state does not have an adequate number of treatment facilities.

Many heroin addicts cannot afford to wait five months for in-patient treatment. Given the severity of a heroin addiction and the agonizingly painful process of detox, many heroin addicts cannot successfully complete the detox and treatment process through outpatient treatment alone. While the governor's proposal to push insurance companies to pay for chemical dependency treatment is fabulous and necessary, it doesn't matter if there is payment available for treatment if there are an insufficient number of facilities to provide that treatment.

Gov. Hassan's proposal would allocate $5 million for community based prevention and treatment efforts in the next two years, which is also necessary, and I applaud that recommendation. Yet, this funding allocation will do nothing to help solve the five-month waiting period for in-patient chemical dependency treatment. Most of our local heroin dealers in Laconia are addicts themselves and deal to support their addiction. If we could get more of these addicts off the streets and into inpatient treatment, we'd significantly reduce the number of heroin dealers on our streets and we'd make our city safer for us all.

A major obstacle to expanding the availability of in-patient chemical dependency treatment to reduce the five-month waiting period is the uncertainty about whether the New Hampshire State Legislature will approve Medicaid expansion for 2017 to ensure continued funding for this endeavor. While I strongly support continuing Medicaid expansion in 2017, if Gov. Hassan and the state Legislature are serious about addressing the heroin and opioid crisis in our state they will find other ways to fund necessary in-patient chemical dependency treatment until they are able to reach a decision regarding Medicaid expansion.

The part of Gov. Hassan's proposal to increase funding for prosecution and further criminalize people possessing opioids is a misguided effort to address the opioid crisis. Opioid addicts need treatment, not punishment. The United States currently incarcerates a higher percentage of its population than any other nation in the world and it is estimated that as many as 70 percent of people currently incarcerated in the United States are incarcerated for non-violent drug related offenses. Jails and prisons are overcrowded — we need look no further than our own Belknap County jail for evidence to prove this point. By prosecuting and giving addicts a criminal record, we make it much more difficult for them to reintegrate into society and obtain gainful employment after they achieve sobriety.

Another harmful component of Gov. Hassan's legislative proposal is that she wants to expand the drug court system in New Hampshire without simultaneously ensuring the availability of adequate treatment resources that are an essential component for effective drug courts.

Many of the heroin addicts with whom I have worked in Laconia are lost young people with untreated trauma backgrounds and mental health challenges from broken families living in extreme poverty. These young people feel no hope for their futures and they need a hand up, not another kick in the teeth.

It is important to take a moment to express gratitude to the true heroes in Laconia's heroin crisis — the men and women that are acting to save lives every day. We are so fortunate to have such a dedicated police force in Laconia lead by Chief Chris Adams. Laconia Police Officer Eric Adams has taken the lead in going above and beyond the typical duties of a police officer to go above and beyond to reach out to the struggling young people in our community by offering options, support, and hope. Our police force is dedicated to collaborating with every interested service provider and community member to make a real difference. It is this type of inclusive team approach that we need at every level of government if we wish to truly make a difference.

As long as there is a strong demand for illegal substances, there will likely be a supply no matter how much we criminalize drug users. According to an article writing by G.L. Fisher and T.C. Harrison, drug treatment interventions can reduce drug use by 40 to 60 percent. According to a 2104 article titled The Management of Substance Abuse, for every dollar invested in drug treatment, seven dollars are saved in health and social costs, including crime and criminal justice costs. Treatment programs are more cost effective for taxpayers than incarcerating substance abuse offenders.

According to another 2008 study by Petteruti and Walsh, "treating cocaine users reduced serious crimes 15 times more effectively than incarceration. Chemical dependency treatment programs reduce substance abuse, crime, and homelessness while increasing employment. Drug treatment not only provided $10,054 in benefits per participant after deducting costs of treatment, but also lowered the chances that a person will commit crimes in the future by 9.3 percent."

Every day, I listen to young people in Laconia tell me that they see no reason to even try to free themselves from chemical dependency because they see no hope for their future. Just a few days ago, a recovering meth addict told me that he turned to meth to keep going when he was already homeless and living outside, starving, and freezing. While it is easy for us to sit in our comfortable homes and judge this choice of a solution, I must admit that I have never been in such a predicament so I must question my ability to judge fairly. If you take the time to listen to the stories of heroin addicts and other folks with serious chemical dependency problems in Laconia, you will often hear stories filled with tremendous suffering and desperation starting from an early age — often long before the substance abuse began. When I listen to these stories, I often think, "there but for the grace of God go I."

Many chemical dependency addicts, including heroin addicts, use heroin and other substances to self medicate their pain and suffering stemming from unresolved mental health challenges, trauma, broken families, poverty, and social isolation. I believe a major cause of our current opioid crisis stems from the state Legislature's decision to gut funding for intensive community-based mental health services and youth and family support, development, and prevention programs over the past decade. If we truly want to resolve the heroin crisis for communities like Laconia, we need to restore funding for intensive community-based mental health and family-support services and other youth support programs to ensure that children, families, and youth receive the help that they need earlier before turning to drugs. We also need to create more opportunities for young adults in our communities to obtain gainful employment that pays a living wage so that they feel some hope for their future. People with hope and a reason to live feel less inclined to turn to dangerous substances such as heroin. Giving people hope and opportunities is a much more powerful motivator to facilitate change than trying to punish people that already believe that they have no hope and nothing left to lose.

A commitment to investing in more inpatient chemical dependency treatment facilities in New Hampshire is an investment in our state's future and an investment in the safety and well-being of our community. Everything and everyone is interconnected. Ultimately what is at stake is the need for us as a society to become clear on and accept our interdependence. We must realize that investing in our most vulnerable citizens is also an investment in ourselves and the people for whom we care about the most because this investment will create safer and happier communities for us all. The myth that each person or nuclear family is an island and only has a responsibility for themselves and their immediate family is a delusion that causes so much unnecessary suffering in our society today.

Although I appreciate Gov. Hassan's initiative to call attention to the heroin and opioid crisis, I would now like both her and the state Legislature to take meaningful action to solve the problem in collaboration with people that work directly with addicts (not just treatment program administrators) and heroin addicts themselves. Please tell Gov. Hassan and your state legislative representatives and state senator not to pass any legislation to address the current opioid and heroin crisis that does not also increase the availability of inpatient chemical dependency treatment and reduce the five month waiting period for this treatment. We need real solutions to real problems.

Dave Lynch

Licensed Clinical Social Worker

  • Category: Letters
  • Hits: 247

States that didn't expand Medicaid have more economic freedom

To The Daily Sun,

The media assumption is that states refusing to expand Medicaid are doing so for purely political reasons. Progressives indulge in name calling against all who oppose Medicaid expansion, calling them fiscally foolhardy and heartless. They argue for Medicaid expansion claiming both it means economic benefits and disproportionate federal funding for state residents without raising taxes ... which sounds great ... but are the claims true?

Researching the matter shows the progressive explanations do not hold water. The evidence indicates expansion states are eager to spend not only their own residents' money but money from other states' taxpayers as well. States that expanded Medicaid tend to have per capita state spending about 17 percent higher than non-expansion states. Common sense should tell us; everyone can't get more money back from the District of Columbia than we send there.

What we have is another situation like the state retirement system ... and we are still trying to dig out from under that mess. It has made New Hampshire's retirement system a comparison in discussions about Detroit ... all in the name of expecting something for nothing. It seems the Legislature and the governor learned nothing from that gaff. Spending money based on optimistic prognostications and then recovering later hamstrings the economy, limits the states options and raises taxes.

The Kaiser Family Foundation released a report in September comparing Medicaid expansion states with those that did not expand. The report was largely unreported locally ... but it t should have created a stir. The report illustrates why many states turned down free federal Medicaid funds. Reduced federal funding over time and expanded enrollment tell us that the results were foreseeable.

The non-expansion states have a higher degree of economic freedom than expansion states. States declining to expand Medicaid tend to be fiscally conservative, with lower taxes and lower spending. In 2004, expansion states had median per capita state and local tax collections of 19 percent more than non-expansion states. By 2012, this gap had widened with expansion states collecting 28 percent more taxes per capita than non-expansion states. Since 2008, expansion states have increased taxes, while non-expansion states have reduced taxes slightly.

The Kaiser report also looked at "taxing capacity," which basically measures whether states are taxing their citizens as much as is possible. It's a function of both income and tax rates. In 2004 expansion states and non-expansion states were taxing at nearly equal levels when comparing their so-called taxing capacity. By 2012, expansion states boosted collections as a percent of taxing capacity by 17 percent compared to non-expansion states.

States that expanded Medicaid tend to be slightly richer, on average, than non-expansion states. But the gap is narrowing, due to state fiscal policies which run counter to economic growth. In 2001 expansion states had real median incomes that were nearly 13 percent higher than non-expansion states. By 2013 this gap narrowed to just over 9 percent. Historically, expansion states had slightly lower poverty rates, but this gap also narrowed to 1 percent by 2012.

Non-expansion states, although slightly poorer, have lower unemployment than expansion states. That should not come as a surprise. It's the result of greater economic freedom. Expansion states tend to have more workers in the health care sector; about 30 percent more. This was true long before the ACA. Annual health care employment growth in both expansion and non-expansion states was about the same from 2008 to 2013. Historically, from 2000 to 2013, health sector employment growth was actually higher in non-expansion states.

Expansion states were historically richer, but that is changing due to their lack of fiscal responsibility. They have less economic freedom, tax their residents more and spend more of their taxpayers' money. The moral of the story is when we vote ourselves more goodies from the public coffer ... taxes go up, freedom goes down and people and companies move away.

Marc Abear


  • Category: Letters
  • Hits: 195