Letter Submission

To submit a letter to the editor, please email us at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. Letters must contain the author's name, hometown (state as well, if not in New Hampshire) and phone number, but the number will not be published. We do not run anonymous letters. Local issues get priority, as do local writers. We encourage writers to keep letters to no more than 400 words, but will accept longer letters to be run on a space-available basis. Editors reserve the right to edit letters for spelling, grammar, punctuation, excessive length and unsuitable content.

 

Rep. Howard’s proposed cuts had potential to harm county

To The Daily Sun,

As former state representatives, from both sides of the aisle, who have voted on numerous county budgets and debated with colleagues the merits of various country programs, we are appalled at the insensitivity demonstrated by state Rep. Howard's budget proposal at last week's hearing.

His premise that Genesis Behavioral Health, the Belknap County Economical Development Council, the County Extension, the Community Action Program do not perform county services is short-sighted and counterproductive. If the mental health, job attraction, agricultural and senior services provided by these agencies disappeared, not only would Belknap County residents be worse off, but the city and towns of Belknap County would end up picking up the tab.

As Commissioner Taylor stated, Rep. Howard's proposed cuts were "arbitrary and capricious" with the potential to do serious harm to individuals and county government as a whole. Commissioner DeVoy was completely accurate when he complained he would be unable to do his job running county services under Rep. Howard's proposal.

We applaud Reps. Abear, Fields, Fisher, Fraser, Huot, Lang and Spanos for their votes to defeat Rep. Howard's proposal, and we urge all members of the County Convention to ultimately support a budget that meets the needs of country residents, not the dictates of some political agenda.
Former State Reps. Lisa DiMartino, Ruth Gulick, Bill Johnson, Elizabeth Merry, Kate Miller, Alida Millham, Ian Raymond

  • Category: Letters
  • Hits: 140

Gilmanton voters should be grateful to have Year-Round Library

To The Daily Sun,

Next Tuesday, March 14, residents of Gilmanton once again have the opportunity to vote "Yes" on Article 23 to support our Year-Round Library on Route 140. How lucky are we that a dedicated group of volunteers raised all the money and labored many, many hours to provide us with this beautiful building? And that every year members of our community contribute to keep costs down such that Article 23 is only asking for partial funding for the year? We have a true deal.

NHPR recently had a story about the 300th anniversary of our State Library, mentioning that our state has 234 communities, and 234 public libraries. Yes, every other town in our state supports a public library to some degree. Yearly I am appalled by the mystifying opposition to this fine asset to our community, especially since the amount requested is merely 0.01 percent of the total town operating budget requested.

What is a community? We come together to support the physical and social needs of our town. Yearly many pay for the local roads on which they never drive, many pay to run the schools even though they do not have children in them, and we all pay for public safety services even though, thankfully, many of us have never needed them. So the issue is not whether or not you use the Library. Many in our community do. Young families and older residents use all the services of the library, while also appreciating it as a community gathering place, as do many others. Like libraries across the globe, ours has been adapting to the digital age, and offers many services other than taking out books: Internet connection, computer use, e-book loans, DVDs, passes to state museums and science centers, etc. Check out all the possibilities.

Yes, some in our community are clinging to a long-held grudge about an aspiration once expressed that perhaps money could be raised for the ongoing expenses of the library. It was never a promise, and, even if it were, let it go! Do we go back and criticize what people opined about the future expenses of any other department? No. Or at least we don't go back 10 years (or more) in our scrutiny.

Be grateful for what we have and vote "Yes" on Article 23 on Tuesday.

Anne Onion

Gilmanton

  • Category: Letters
  • Hits: 124