MeredithMay2017

Letter Submission

To submit a letter to the editor, please email us at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. Letters must contain the author's name, hometown (state as well, if not in New Hampshire) and phone number, but the number will not be published. We do not run anonymous letters. Local issues get priority, as do local writers. We encourage writers to keep letters to no more than 400 words, but will accept longer letters to be run on a space-available basis. Editors reserve the right to edit letters for spelling, grammar, punctuation, excessive length and unsuitable content.

 

Why keep moderators from performing their constitutional duties?

To The Daily Sun,

Senate Bill 109 was voted down last week by the state Senate. They refused to authorize town moderators to perform a public, random, verification count on vote-counting machines. With only voiced support for SB-109 from a few senators, it is clear that the New Hampshire Senate would rather assume vote-counting machines are accurate than to have evidence of their accuracy.

An amendment was recommended by prime sponsor, Sen. Martha Fuller Clark during the session, but the Senate would not overturn the committee recommendation (3-2 ITL) in order to consider the amendment. The amendment addressed concerns expressed by the Attorney General's office.

In order for the governed to give consent (as articulated in Part 1, Art. 1 of the New Hampshire Constitution) and hold elected officials accountable (as Part 1, Art. 8 of the New Hampshire Constitution declares is their right) through a vote cast, people in each town, city, ward and unincorporated place have a fundamental right to vote (as we see in Part 1, Art. 11 of the New Hampshire Constitution) and receive a verified accurate vote count.

The responsibility for verifying the accuracy of that vote count is held within each community and constitutionally assigned to the town moderators. But the Granite State is approaching 90 percent of municipalities using secret, proprietary software in vote-counting devices without any specific clarity or method to a moderator's constitutional duty to verify the accuracy of the vote-counting machines. SB-109 proposed a means and a method for town moderators to fulfill their constitutional duties and state law where vote-counting devices are used.

Moderators take an oath pursuant to Part 2, Art. 84 of the New Hampshire Constitution and are bound by Part 2, Art. 32 to govern the election process, to openly oversee the counting of votes on election night and make a public declaration of an accurate vote count. In a better political climate, SB-109 might not be necessary, but town moderators have recently had their constitutional authority questioned and challenged by state election officials, and it is absolutely necessary to reaffirm in explicit law, authority that empowers moderators to fulfill their constitutional duty to openly and accurately verify votes counted by vote-counting devices.

Why do state election officials and our senators object to town moderators fulfilling their constitutional duties and numerous state laws that hold them accountable for an accurate vote count? Reach out to your senator and ask how they voted on SB-109. Go to (http://www.nhcommunityrights.org/news--updates/an-accurate-vote-count-doesnt-count-in-nh) for additional information to assist you in speaking with your senator about SB-109.

New Hampshire Community Rights Network (NHCRN) stood up for election integrity and one of our most basic civil rights, our right to vote and have our vote counted accurately by supporting and providing testimony in favor of SB-109. Join "NHCRN" on Facebook or visit them online at www.nhcommunityrights.org to learn about educational opportunities and sign up to receive newsletters and updates about the Community Rights Movement. NHCRN is a grassroots, non-profit organization of community rights efforts, educating and empowering communities and elected officials about our right to local self-governance.

​Michelle Sanborn

NHCRN Coordinator

Alexandria​

  • Category: Letters
  • Hits: 175

Doubling state tax credit program will benefit many non-profits

To The Daily Sun,

I am writing this letter to voice my strong support for House Bill 574. In its original form, the passage of this bill will increase the tax credit program administered by the New Hampshire Community Development Finance Authority (CDFA) from the current level of $5 million to $10 million. This program benefits local non-profit causes tremendously in that it provides an incentive for businesses to direct their hard earned revenue to a cause that they support.

Local non-profit organizations, like the Boys & Girls Clubs of Central New Hampshire, have benefited greatly from this program as we successfully completed three capital campaigns; in Concord, Allenstown and Laconia respectfully. More specifically, we recently built a facility in Allenstown and renovated a facility in Laconia, neither project would have been successful had it not been for the CDFA tax credit program.

One unique aspect of our Allenstown facility is that it is home to both the Boys & Girls Club and Suncook Senior Center, providing the community with a multigenerational space that fosters growth and meaningful relationships between local youth and seniors. Without the support of CDFA's tax credit program, innovative and transformative community development projects like the Allenstown Community Center — the benefits of which we'll see across generations for many years to come — would not have been possible.

By supporting HB-574, we can effectively boost the positive impact non-profits and businesses have on their local communities.

Christopher Emond

Chief Executive Officer

Boys & Girls Clubs of Central N.H.

  • Category: Letters
  • Hits: 236