Letter Submission

To submit a letter to the editor, please email us at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. Letters must contain the author's name, hometown (state as well, if not in New Hampshire) and phone number, but the number will not be published. We do not run anonymous letters. Local issues get priority, as do local writers. We encourage writers to keep letters to no more than 400 words, but will accept longer letters to be run on a space-available basis. Letters may be edited for spelling, grammar, punctuation and legal concerns.

 

Bob Meade - Who will fix the problems?

There is an old saying, when you point a finger at someone, there's always three pointing back at you. As we consider the choices that have been made in selecting one of the four presidential candidates who will be on the ballots, most of us would like to point a finger . . . to blame someone else for the poor choices. But, collectively, it is we, the people, who have put us in the position not to vote for the best possible candidate to lead our great country through these difficult and threatening times, but to vote for the one we think will do the least harm.

We are the third largest nation in the world. We have an abundance of genius all around us. We lead the world in technology and innovation. Our standard of living is at the top of the heap. We're the most generous nation in the world. Our military is second to none. Throughout our history we have been a haven for those who have sought peace and a better life. We have fought in wars across the world, and hundreds of thousands of our bravest citizens have given their lives, not to conquer, but to defeat tyranny and bring peace to others. But, in spite of all those merits, all too often, we have chosen a selfish path, choosing to be passive by not monitoring or not demanding the best from our government. In many ways, we have let it run amok. For example . . .

We are told that, ignorance of the law is no excuse. Really! With that in mind, do you know that our federal tax code is over 74,000 pages in length. Have you read and do you understand each one of the rules listed on those pages. If not, you may have violated the law and be subject to prosecution and a fine.

Of course by this time you must have read the regulations (that have the force of law) in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act — aka Obamacare. Those 10,516 pages are eight times longer than the Bible. And, while the Bible is not part of the federal tax code, the Supreme Court determined that Obamacare was legal because it is a tax. Make sure you read those 10,516 pages before you get into trouble.

A study by the Government Accountability Office (GAO) showed that in 2014, not counting postal workers, there were 1.9 million federal government employees. The report also indicated, ". . . total government-wide compensation for each full-time equivalent (FTE) position grew by an average of 1.2 percent per year, from $106,097 in 2004 to $116,828 in 2012." Compare that number to $67,163, which is what the Bureau of Labor Statistics' study showed for worker's wages and benefits in the private sector. Why would workers want to labor in the private sector and be subject to market trends, the need to make a profit, possible loss of job, etc., and only receive wages and benefits equal to only 57 percent of what is paid to a federal employee. By the way, if you recall the IRS scandal, in spite of all their misdeeds, no one was fired. Some key executives "took the fifth" and refused to be held accountable. They were reprimanded by being given an extended "paid leave" as their punishment.

What was written above only gives a bit of information about the IRS and a portion of Health and Human Services dealing with Obamacare. Consider, if you will, that there are these additional federal cabinet-level departments: Agriculture, Commerce, Defense, Energy, Homeland Security, Housing and Urban Development, Interior, Justice, Labor, State, Transportation, Treasury (includes the IRS), and Veteran's Affairs. A number of these departments have caused us some concern over the last few years. For example:
— The State Dept. has presided over a series of failures in the Middle East. Iran has continually taunted and humiliated our country with virtually no response. China and Russia are flexing their muscle and expanding their interests with little cause to be concerned about our possible reaction. The former secretary has shown a total disregard for the safety and security of government information and left her position with $6 billion of federal funds being unaccounted for.
— The head of the IRS has stonewalled Congress in their requests for documents. He allowed critical information that had been requested by Congress to be destroyed. He has not fired a single employee for malfeasance.
— The department of Veteran's Affairs, in spite of huge increases in departmental funding during the Clinton, Bush (43), and Obama administrations, has failed to overcome the conditions that lead to its scandal concerning failure to provide needed services to veterans in a timely manner. Bonus money was paid to executives who were worthy of being dismissed.
— The Department of Education has failed to improve results as we continue to drop to mediocre levels. The Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) ranked the United States 27th out of 34 countries in math, 17th in reading, and 20th in science. These results were in spite of the fact that this country spends more per pupil than any other industrialized country in the world. And, we spend over $77 billion annually to run this failing department.

Which candidates indicated a willingness to "take on" our bureaucracies?

(Bob Meade is a Laconia resident. He may be contacted at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.)

 

  • Category: Letters
  • Hits: 240

I've been hoping military would rise & take Obama ito custody

To The Daily Sun,

Article VI of the Constitution requires Officials to take an oath "to support this Constitution." The Naturalization Act of 1790 provided for an "updated oath" of allegiance to be administered to support the Constitution. Today, 5 U.S.C. 3331, which became law in 1868 after the Civil War, and updated again in 1884, specifies the current language of the oath in effect for federal officials.

According to this statute, all public officials must "solemnly swear (or affirm)" that they "will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic" and that they "will bear true faith and allegiance to the same."

As a young schoolboy, I had always been intrigued by this language, especially the words "...and domestic." I naively wondered how could anyone who lived in this country be a "domestic enemy?"

We recently discovered that the Obama administration lied to us about the circumstances surrounding the untraceable "cash" ransom payments, in exchange for four American hostages being held by Iran, amounting to over $1 billion, to our #1 "foreign enemy." We were told by the "thief-in-chief" himself that we had to give them cash because "... we are so strict in maintaining sanctions, and we do not have a banking relationship ... we couldn't send a check, and we could not wire the money..."

Now a new lie regarding Iran has just emerged. In July 2015 and April 2016 we sent Iran a total of $10 million to "close the books" on a couple of pending "arrangements," not related to the hostage deal. And how were those funds transferred, as recently disclosed by the Treasury Department? Electronic wire transfer. Which makes the explanation for the "cash" payments to the Iranians in exchange for the four hostages ... a total bold-faced lie.

Obama wasn't our first "domestic enemy," of course. Back in the 1950s, a man and his wife, Julius and Ethel Rosenberg, were executed for spying for Soviet Russia against the U.S. And there have been others. But for the past eight years, this presidency has been administered by a mafia-like "criminal enterprise" that has deceived the American populace about everything. He is, without a doubt, a "domestic enemy," an enemy from within. He refuses to recognize our "foreign enemy," Iran, continuing to make excuses for them, their ideology, their methods, and refuses to even address them by their true identity.

Just this past weekend, this country suffered five radical Islamic terrorist attacks in three different states, and he still makes excuses for them. Radical Islamic worldwide terrorists could not have a better "inside man" in Washington than B. Hussein Obama. In Hussein Obama's book, "The Audacity of Hope," which he wrote before he became president, he said this: "I will stand with (Muslims) should the political winds shift in an ugly direction." What an incredible thing for him, or anyone who wants to be president, to say about any enemy of this country.

He lied about Obamacare. He lied about ISIS. He lied about the nuclear deal with Iran. He never released his college scholastic records. He lied about his travel from Indonesia to Pakistan as a teenager, on and on, etc., etc., and so forth.

Since his re-election in 2012, I have been hoping that out of the thousands of generals and admirals in our military, that just a small handful would emerge with enough courage and conviction, to take him into custody, and make him stand trial for treason. Unfortunately for the rest of us, cowardice, fear, and political-correctness will keep that from ever happening.

Hillary Clinton is no better, and in many ways, much worse. She has been a hard-left "political insider" in some capacity for 30 years. She is complicit in the Benghazi attacks that killed our Ambassador and three other brave Americans in 2011, on the 10th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks. She is a sure bet to continue to take this country down the wrong road to socialism, appointing judges at all levels to life-time seats, guaranteed to change the way of life in America for our grandchildren for generations to come.

Simply put, they are both "domestic enemies" of the United States, and anyone who supports them and their policies for America, which are based on the "Saul Alinsky School of Dishonesty and Deception," does not care about the future of this country, or believe in the concept of American Exceptionalism.

There is a verse in the New Testament Book of James 3:1, which says, "... not many of you should become teachers, because we who teach in the church will be judged by God with stricter judgment."

What if the same principle also applies to political leaders...

Jim McCoole
Laconia

  • Category: Letters
  • Hits: 1139