A+ A A-

N.H. overall tax burden may be low but it's not shared equally

To The Daily Sun,

Last week the New Hampshire Senate passed a bill that would reduce the rate of the business profits and the business enterprise taxes. That action will reduce the state revenue about $80 million. So with less revenue for essential community services, who will pick up the cost?

Supposedly New Hampshire has one of the lowest tax burdens in the nation. The tax burden is not shared equally. With the reduction of business taxes, no estate tax, and no income tax, we will see property taxes increase. The least able will continue to pay the highest percentage of their income for taxes.

We will remain a haven for the rich, while local government will need to increase property taxes and many community organizations will need to increase their fundraising efforts. We can hope the wealthy who reap the benefits of low taxes will continue to open their wallets to those organizations and agencies. Our lowest-income families will need assistance to pay their energy, healthcare, housing, childcare, and food.

Our second hope is that our legislators will recognize the need to support a reasonable minimum wage.

Susan Wiley

Sandwich

Last Updated on Tuesday, 10 March 2015 09:55

Hits: 79

Letters should be fact-checked by a nonpartisan panel

To The Daily Sun,

Don't know about the rest of you letter writers but religion seems to be the main topic these days. Since Friday, Feb. 20, religion has been the main topic seven times from the usual political writers.

Local politics took up most of the other letters that week. Of those writers I include: Linda Wood, Siden, Cracraft, Earle, Veverka, Jim McCoole, McCoy and Ewing. Earle and Veverka have their own personal issues, but most attacks were towards Siden and Veverka. Other interesting, non-religion based, writers are Bernadette Loesch, Whitman, Michael Harris with some good ideas for thought, Linda Riley on taxes, Russ Wiles and G.W. Brooks on climate change.

Hopefully some form of fact checking took place before these were sent for publication. As for my opinion, I feel no letters — or more important, no TV-type ad — should be run until they are fact checked by a non­partisan panel of some type. Especially before an election. This might be the only possible way of getting something truthful out to the voters. For those of you that don't think this is important just look or listen to those elected. That should convince you beyond all doubt.

We can't control the way they do the job, but at least we will know they have some information of the topics they will be considering. Most likely any of us could do just as well as they do now. We might vote out of order or not understand how to or when a filibuster is okay. It should be simple ­ Yes or No / Pass or Fail ­ easy right?

The only people who know this get elected but they still don't have a clue what the vote was all about.

Jon Hoyt

Plymouth

Last Updated on Tuesday, 10 March 2015 09:52

Hits: 131

Up here, even Democrats know that guns are great equalizer

To The Daily Sun,

Let us harken back to the days of yesteryear, when outlaws roamed the west. Before the times when town marshals could communicate by radio, or use mug shots to identify strangers riding into town, they had limited options available to keep the peace. Most often the trouble came when drifters and cowboys came into town to get liquored up and spend their wages. So it was a prudent policy to disarm them until they sobered up. However, the local townspeople were free to keep their guns at the ready and the law officers were glad that they did. The idea that the Wild West was tamed by disarming the population is the stuff of liberal fantasy.

To hear George Maloof complain about the lawless atmosphere concerning guns in America today, there must be shootouts happening all over the place. Heck, with all of the high powered weaponry out there today, the streets should be running rivers of blood every Saturday night according to him. Maybe in some gang and drug infested cities, liberal policies have created a situation where no one has the guns except the bad guys. If you want to read about what it's like, check out some Chicago newspapers any Monday morning or New York, or Los Angeles, where the Democrat political machine controls the gun laws.

Here in northern New England we have all the guns we want compared to our neighboring states just south of us. Practically any one can have a license to carry a loaded concealed handgun or own a modern rifle, yet Vermont, New Hampshire and Maine have some of the lowest crime rates in the country. How can that be Mr. George Maloof? Up here even most Democrats understand that having a gun available is a great equalizer even if they won't admit it.

We do have plenty of dangerous people running around, mostly strung out drug addicts looking for the next fix, or road rage nuts on the highway. I for one am glad that there are more regular folks around that are prepared to fight back. I am glad that we in New Hampshire have that choice.

Mr. Maloof, you would like to turn us all into defenseless victims. You are more afraid of the Tea Party. Get a grip on reality man.

Alan Moon

Tilton

Last Updated on Tuesday, 10 March 2015 09:49

Hits: 73

At no time did I think trip to Washington D.C. was a bad idea

To The Daily Sun,

As a teacher part of my job is to deal with a certain amount of criticism. At any given time, students, parents, administration, or community members may question or disagree with the way I do things such as assigning homework or running my class. In general, I welcome the feedback because it helps me reflect on my teaching and grow as an educator. However, I do take issue with some of the inflammatory remarks that have been said about me and my colleagues recently in the newspaper as well as in social media regarding the Alton Central School Washington, D.C., trip, and for that reason I'd like a chance to set the record straight.

As it is apparent that the major issue people have expressed is that someone surveyed the students, I felt it necessary to step forward and say that it was my idea to do so, and I'd like to clarify why, because although it has been called a "bonehead move" and something that should not have been done at all, I would like to respectfully disagree.

A student came to the teachers to discuss a trip that she had been raising money for over the last two years. As a result of the presentation, two things became clear. The first is that there was still a lot of fund-raising to be done with an approaching deadline to book the trip looming relatively soon. She said that over the last two years they were actively raising funds. So far they had approximately $4,500, and according to her figures, a conservative estimate of what the students would still need to raise is at least an additional $20,000. Also, a parent survey that they had distributed and compiled earlier this year had a very low return (approximately 20 out of 51 students). Those two factors led me to suggest we survey the students about their interest and commitment level to this trip.

When the results came back, it was clear that there was not an overwhelming majority of students willing to do the work it would take to get the trip where it needed to be in time. I went forward with the information and asked what to do with it. At no time did the teachers "kill it". The only part we played was to collect the data in an unbiased, anonymous format (the students took it on the spot on remote clicker technology and were not able to discuss any of it before, during or after the survey) and to try to interpret and pass on the information provided.

I care a lot about my students. I spend many hours deciding how to reach them most effectively. I think about them about as much on weekends as I do weekdays. I worry about them, I try to help them achieve successes, and I fight for them to have a voice in as much as they can in their education. Realistically the vast majority of a student's day is out of his or her control. Teachers, parents and other adults still have a significant amount of influence over what an adolescent does during the day, which makes sense. They aren't developmentally ready to make all choices for themselves. However, I do believe in allowing them choices when possible. Best practices in education state that voice and choice are particularly important to student success in middle school. This is also an essential component of my own educational philosophy. In fact, my colleague and I have worked tirelessly this year to bring a stronger voice in decision-making to our students through transforming our pre-existing student council into a student leadership group. We believe that what students think and how they feel about things does matter.

I feel strongly that students should have a voice in planning their 8th grade trip. Ironically this one would be to the most democratic place in the nation. We have historically asked for student input for the 8th grade trip, so it is also based on past practice. In fact, these same students were apparently polled in fifth grade and had a lot of enthusiasm for the idea at the start. However, since this was both quite a while ago in the life of an adolescent and before much of the work of fund-raising had begun, an updated student survey just made sense.

I want to be clear that at no time did I think this trip was a bad idea. In fact, I was on-board and willing to chaperone, leaving my own family for the time it required, especially since this group of students is one of the best groups I have ever had the pleasure to teach. If this was something the majority of them wanted, I would be more than happy to do so. As it turned out though, only 19 percent reported they wanted to pursue this trip.

Part of me was reluctant to write this letter, as I know in doing so I may invite additional attacks and disparaging remarks; however, I decided to write it for a number of reasons. One is for the students who don't want to go on the trip. They should know that their opinion is important and matters to many of us. Another is for the students who are continuing to fight to go on the trip. They see this issue as a problem, and they are working to solve it. I applaud them for their perseverance and follow-through. I will continue to advocate for all of my students to have a voice. Though, I also want those particular students to see that the way to discuss and solve problems should never include name-calling, questioning ethics, besmirching reputations or misrepresenting facts.

Lastly, I write this letter for me, because if I am trying to teach my students to stand up for themselves and for what they believe is right, I also need to be able to do so myself.

Kristen Brooks

Barnstead

Last Updated on Tuesday, 10 March 2015 09:38

Hits: 99

Where do people get their 'recreational' pain-killing drugs

To The Daily Sun,

We regularly read about people being arrested for using recreational pain-killing drugs, but never about how they got the stuff.

It seems that if there is a valid use for it, there must be a way to locate it, and with that warnings as needed. Like pot, which has many good uses, well defined in some states, but ignored in New Hampshire. Anyone with good info on that please write me at 38 Briarcliff Rd., Gilford, NH 03249-6705

Jack Stephenson

Gilford

Last Updated on Tuesday, 10 March 2015 09:31

Hits: 153

The Laconia Daily Sun - All Rights Reserved
Privacy Policy
Powered by BENN a division of the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette