Letter Submission

To submit a letter to the editor, please email us at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. Letters must contain the author's name, hometown (state as well, if not in New Hampshire) and phone number, but the number will not be published. We do not run anonymous letters. Local issues get priority, as do local writers. We encourage writers to keep letters to no more than 400 words, but will accept longer letters to be run on a space-available basis. Letters may be edited for spelling, grammar, punctuation and legal concerns.

 

Jon Pike isn't afraid to stand up for what he believes is best

To The Daily Sun,

On Tuesday, March 8, you will see four names on the ballot, but the best choice for the town of Belmont is Jon Pike.

His roots in Belmont run deep and his longtime involvement in town affairs have given him an unparalleled understanding of the issues facing the town.

Most recently, he spearheaded the SB-2 which allows the town to vote by ballot on issues relating to the Shaker Regional School District.

Jon is avid about keeping our small-town values but isn't afraid to stand up for what he believes is best for the town of Belmont. We believe that he has already exemplified those values in his first two terms as selectmen, which is why we urge you to vote for Jon Pike so he may carry out a third.

Claude "Sonny" Patten

Belmont

  • Category: Letters
  • Hits: 163

Dollar for dollar, the Gilford BudCom is an enormous waste of time

To The Daily Sun,
A couple of concerned citizens, in recent letters, have suggested that if not for the Gilford Budget Committee, certain town and school expenses would have been even higher in the past than they were. Let's set the record straight on this.
Without the Budget Committee:
1. Concerned citizens raise the exact same issues and make the exact same changes to the budgets at the Deliberative Session.
2. Voters still get to accept or reject a budget presented to them, after any Deliberative Session changes, on voting day.
3. The School Board and the Board of Selectmen become more directly accountable for their actions, and can easily be voted out if they don't control spending responsibly.
Whether it's the fire engine or the enrollment-to-staffing ratio or any other issue, there are still multiple opportunities to address these concerns without a Budget Committee.
People hearing the question "Will this make it past the Budget Committee?" are hearing it because the Budget Committee is often irrational. It debated an expenditure on replacement chairs worth less than $2,000 (out of a $12 million budget) across three committee sessions in last year's budget season, for example.
Some Budget Committee members also derail meetings with their own personal agendas, as one member did in last year's session by using committee time to question the Selectboard's representative during two separate meetings about the lighting of flags in the town after Labor Day — a topic not associated with a single budgetary line item.
The analysis that Fred Butler and I presented looked specifically at the financials presented to the Budget Committee by the Board of Selectmen and the School Board, year by year, and what the Budget Committee did with those numbers. And despite literally thousands of hours spent in the last seven years, the net effect was minuscule — roughly $2 per year in property taxes on a $200,000 home.
Hour for hour, dollar for dollar, the Budget Committee is an enormous waste of time. Please vote "YES" on Article 30, and let's focus our efforts to save taxpayer money where they really count.
Allen Voivod
Gilford

  • Category: Letters
  • Hits: 146