To The Daily Sun,
Bristol is lucky enough to have three very qualified candidates running for Selectboard this year. Each of these candidates offers experience and stands for what they believe to be the right direction for Bristol. We each have a choice for sure and it is our hope that voters will turn out in mass to vote their choice.
We the undersigned will be voting for Paul Manganiello for Selectboard. We will do so for a variety of reasons personal to our own beliefs, but we all agree that he is the best candidate for the following strengths he will bring to the position:
— An open mind, balanced with strength of conviction.
— A commitment to fiscally responsible decisions.
— A consideration of taxpayer burden in decisions on spending.
— A common sense perspective to deliberative process and decisions.
— A promise of open and transparent governing.
— Respect for staff, departments, and fellow officials.
— Dedication to community and economic development efforts.
— Determination to weigh all decisions based on what is in the best interest of the town.
Join us with a vote for Paul Manganiello on March 10.
Burt Williams, Bill Phinney, Mason & Jane Westfall, John & Eleanor Morrison, Arthur Casey, JP & Elizabeth Morrison, Scott Doucette, Bill & Janet Cote, Mary Jane Rivest, Paul Simard, Betsy Schneider, Boake & Betty Morrison, Ray & Fran Parkhurst, Ernie & Nancy Richards, Rebecca Boudreau Margaret Hoyle
Last Updated on Thursday, 05 March 2015 12:15
To The Daily Sun,
It is that time again when we voters of Belmont are preparing to go to the polls to vote for the position of selectman for a term of three years. I have placed my name on the ballot to represent you, as I have represented you in the past. I am a common-sense person and that has served me well in my personal and business life. I am, and have always been, an independent thinker and I can listen to both sides of an argument.
Most people lose sight of the fact that the voters are the people in charge because they are the ones who make the final decision in the end. A leader's job is to keep the voters informed as to what is being planned and to advise them regarding the best course of action.
I am a voter and a concerned citizen and I am not happy at all with the leadership in the Town Hall. For example, did anyone in this town vote to approve the construction of a pavilion or the purchase of a bridge? Were the voters informed of the fact that meetings were being held at a time that no working person could have possibly attended regarding the mill building? The present leadership does nothing to encourage voter participation.
Advertising in the newspaper or writing a news release to all 3,000 voters that a Town Meeting is going to be held to vote on the Town Warrant Articles on March 10 at the high school from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. would inform voters and encourage greater voter turnout.
I aim to change this type of behavior with your help.
I am going to vote against the $3.4-million bond issue (Article 3 of the Warrant). I am also going to vote against Article 12 of the Warrant for $125,000 to go into the capital reserve fund. The selectman have $500,000 in that fund already. They use that money to build pavilions and bridges without your approval.
To all the 3,000 voters in Belmont, you have the opportunity to take a few minutes of your time to vote on the proposed $3.4-million bond issue. How much time will it take, 20 or 30 minutes? If that bond issue passes you will be married to that bond for 20 years and wondering why your taxes keep going up every year.
I respectfully ask for your vote as selectman so that I can represent the taxpayers interest and seek greater participation through transparency.
Last Updated on Thursday, 05 March 2015 12:12
To The Daily Sun,
Having been involved in town government in Ashland for the past several years in many capacities, including Budget Committee, Capital Improvement Program Committee, Economic Development Committee, and now as a member of the Ashland Selectboard, I have seen, studied, experienced, and participated in the challenges of small-town municipal government.
This experience has made it clear to me that if we want to increase the chances of developing and continually operating Ashland as a financially sound town and enjoy our small town New Hampshire community, the five-member board is more likely to make that happen.
Some facts and thoughts to support a five-member board and reject going back to a three-member board:
— Five Selectboard members that have the desire and skills to help govern the town and participate in the many important committees and boards involved is more likely to be successful then with a three-member board simply because tasks can be shared by more people.
— Collaboration and communication with the town committees and organizations as well as tapping resources of regional, state and federal organizations is critical for a small town. Five people make it easier than three and is still a small enough group to make decisions.
— If a three-member board has a member missing it can cause major problems in effective decision-making.
— One member in a three-member board can much more easily control decisions by getting one member to
go their way consistently.
— A five-member board increases the likelihood of transparency and new ideas and opinions.
Ashland has moved forward with several initiatives recently under the first year of a five-member board format to include:
— A continually inclusive, collaborative and informative Financial Forum that involved many different departments of the town to help identify, communicate and plan for short and long term capital project costs.
— An active Ashland Economic Development Committee to help grow our tax base and lower tax rates.
— Participation in numerous regional and state organizations to help find funds and improve the efficiency of our systems.
— Beginning the coordinated process for applying for and obtaining grant money to help fund town needs.
— Creation of a priority list to track and ensure follow thru and transparency on key initiatives.
— Evaluated our I.T. infrastructure to keep it progressive but inexpensive.
— Began a long overdue process to bring GIS technology into our tax maps and will eventually help digitize many aspects of our recordkeeping and allow for more transparency.
— Significantly increased collaboration among departments and committees that is absolutely critical to our future success.
— Begun to review ordinances and processes to help ensure consistency, transparency, and efficiency in how we operate.
These all are much more likely to be managed effectively with a five-member team as opposed to a three-member team.
Some final facts:
— Approximately 87 percent of the votes taken in both a three-member board in 2013 and a five-member board in 2014 were unanimous votes from March to December, which would appear to show no significant disagreement after discussion of facts.
— Only three votes out of 98 were 3-2 votes in 2014.
Vote "No" on Article 23 on Tuesday. March 10. We do not want to go back to a three-member Selectboard
Ashland Selectboard Member
Last Updated on Thursday, 05 March 2015 12:08
To The Daily Sun,
Brett Currier — write in candidate for Gilmanton selectman!
Brett has done an excellent job the past three years as our selectman. He has tried to keep taxes down and provide the town with essential services. In doing so, he has had to make his choices which some do not agree with, but they were necessary choices.
He stated he would run for one term and has kept that promise, but we asked him to run as a rite in candidate and he has agreed. Please join us in re-electing Brett Currier by writing him in as selectman. Brett Currier is a friend of taxpayers and the people of Gilmanton.
Wayne Ogni, John Weston, Bill Mahoney
Last Updated on Thursday, 05 March 2015 12:00
To The Daily Sun,
At the candidates forum for the Governor Wentworth Regional School District, Robert Theriault, Ossipee School Board candidate, questioned the high cost of the annual warrant article setting aside in a capital reserve fund $60,000 for the impeding replacement in nine years of the turf field at Kingswood. This is an annual request. Every 12 years the field will have to be replaced at an estimated $700,000.
Although, a sports fan and lifelong resident who is proud of our Kingswood athletics this will get my "No" vote on Tuesday. If you are from Wolfeboro, Ossipee, Effingham, New Durham or Brookfield think about this and vote "No."
Capital reserves are set up for many reasons. They do lessen the impact on a huge amount being voted on and voters are more than likely to approve a small amount over a period of time. The argument used to be that it saved on interest a bond would have. Now that is not an issue. A bond also requires a two-thirds vote — hard to get most of the time. The article also says that it has no impact on the taxpayers. However, the money always comes from somewhere and if it is out there, should be used for something more needed or better yet returned as a credit to the tax assessment.
I feel that this is one of the things with the new school that rode in on a trailer and even the most avid watchdogs did not see it coming. Also I heard on national TV that the current turf fields can cause burns that may lead to cancer. We have a so-called few of a kind in the state that is used infrequently, (and) will be a never-ending burden on taxpayers.
I agree with Bob of Ossipee and hopefully after the useful life of this field it will be returned to good old Mother Earth.
Last Updated on Thursday, 05 March 2015 11:13