Letter Submission

To submit a letter to the editor, please email us at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. Letters must contain the author's name, hometown (state as well, if not in New Hampshire) and phone number, but the number will not be published. We do not run anonymous letters. Local issues get priority, as do local writers. We encourage writers to keep letters to no more than 400 words, but will accept longer letters to be run on a space-available basis. Letters may be edited for spelling, grammar, punctuation and legal concerns.


Committee looking at long-term needs of T-N Fire Department

To The Daily Sun,

At the March 2015 Tilton-Northfield Fire and EMS annual District Meeting the voters approved hiring a fire station consultant to work with the district to help determine the current and future facilities needs. The commissioners have hired Warrenstreet Architects of Concord to provide these consulting services.

A committee of town residents from Tilton and Northfield has been assembled to work with the consultant, the commissioners and the fire department to look at the long term needs, gather pertinent data, receive input from stakeholders and provide recommendations. Our hope is to provide options to the district at public hearings to be held later this year and with input from these hearings develop a plan for the next District Meeting.

While all are in agreement that the district has some very urgent needs, the solutions are far from clear. We are well aware that we have our work cut out for us. We look for your support as we move through this task together. Our meeting dates are listed on the district website at tnfd.org and our public hearings will be announced and advertised to encourage participation from as many residents as possible.

On behalf of the committee, I thank you in advance for your participation and assistance with this process.

Tim Sattler, Chair

Tilton-Northfield Fire & EMS Facilities Committee

  • Category: Letters
  • Hits: 291

Simply lowering N.H. business taxes won't energize our economy

To The Daily Sun,
Recently, State Representative Peter Spanos submitted a letter to the editor in which he professed to have concerns about the poor and working poor and the fact that they are over-taxed, having to pay for such things as health insurance under the Affordable Care Act. I am pleased that Republicans have concerns for the less well-off and am equally pleased that Representative Spanos does not want to see those who are less able to have to pay high taxes. Perhaps then, he feels that it is the more fortunate in our society who should be paying a greater percentage. Or maybe not. He supports the "trickle down" theory of economics — a theory that says a cut in taxes on the wealthy will benefit everyone. He also does not believe that society, through government programs, should assist the poor and working poor. He voted for a budget in committee and on the floor of the House that cut funding for Meals on Wheels, ServiceLink, homeless shelters, substance abuse programs, developmental disability services, Lakes Region Community College, and would have cost the city of Laconia hundreds of thousands of dollars in education funding. If that weren't bad enough, he voted to raid funds for renewable energy ($50 million) and completely wipe out the state's Rainy Day Fund ($9 million). His votes were fiscally irresponsible and had his priorities become law, our economy and all the citizens of New Hampshire would have paid dearly —especially those whom he seemed in his letter to be so concerned about.

When it comes to the ACA and New Hampshire's Health Protection Program, early results clearly indicate that it is working. Contrary to Rep. Spanos's assertion of its "debilitating effect" on our economy he should note that our unemployment rate now is 3.6 percent and our economic growth for 2014 was tied for highest in New England and greater than the national average. Without the New Hampshire Health Protection Act, employers and families would continue to pay the hidden healthcare tax that resulted from excessive numbers of uninsured. Moreover, the New Hampshire Hospital Association has provided data that indicates that with more people having insurance, free care is declining and for the first time in 50 years overall healthcare spending has slowed.
Simply lowering business taxes will not energize our economy. Nor will it benefit many businesses (except perhaps Planet Fitness). Look at how this economic theory failed in now nearly-bankrupt Kansas and Louisiana! This tax policy will certainly continue to reduce the limited resources we have to address our heroin and mental health crisis, our transportation infrastructure and public safety, to name a few. The less the state can to do to combat these challenges, the more these costs are down shifted to local communities. After all, the needs do not disappear simply because the funding for the programs is cut. The reality is our property taxes will continue to rise because of the increased cost to police departments, fire departments, jails, etc. This down-shifting will be a drag on our economy and we will find ourselves in a fiscal crisis similar to Kansas and Louisiana.
I support Governor Hassan's veto of the budget. Even though this compromise between the Senate and the House version is much better than the original House version, more work needs to be done. I hope legislators can forge a compromise that is based on facts and puts the people of New Hampshire ahead of partisan politics.
Dorothy Piquado

  • Category: Letters
  • Hits: 484