April 728x90TopBanner

Letter Submission

To submit a letter to the editor, please email us at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. Letters must contain the author's name, hometown (state as well, if not in New Hampshire) and phone number, but the number will not be published. We do not run anonymous letters. Local issues get priority, as do local writers. We encourage writers to keep letters to no more than 400 words, but will accept longer letters to be run on a space-available basis. Editors reserve the right to edit letters for spelling, grammar, punctuation, excessive length and unsuitable content.


We need to prioritize funding for global vaccine programs

To The Daily Sun,

One and a half million children die each year from diseases that could have been prevented by a vaccine. This is because, shockingly, one in five children in the world still lacks access to the basic childhood vaccines we take for granted here in the United States.

Great strides have been made over the last decade to give more families access to immunizations for their children. The measles vaccine alone has prevented an estimated 20.3 million deaths from 2000-2015, a 79 percent reduction! We cannot stop now and lose the significant gains we've made.

In addition to the moral and humanitarian impact, giving children around the world access to immunizations increases global and national security. In today's interconnected world, these deadly diseases don't stop at borders, as demonstrated by recent measles outbreaks and Ebola cases in the U.S. Immunizations are also a financially sound investment; for every $1 spent on childhood immunizations, you get $44 in economic benefits. That includes saving the money that families lose when a child is sick and a parent can't work.

The United Nations Foundation's Shot@Life campaign is asking U.S. legislators to help reduce vaccine-preventable childhood deaths around the world by providing adequate funding for global vaccine programs. Call your U.S. legislators' offices and ask them to strengthen and prioritize funding for global vaccine programs through partners such as the United Nations, Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, CDC, and USAID.

We all have a stake in the outcome and parents around the world will sleep more soundly knowing their children are protected.

Linda Martino


  • Category: Letters
  • Hits: 613

In truth, county spending will go up $1.5 million — 5.7%

To The Daily Sun,

It is interesting to observe that the Belmont Selectboard has chosen to characterize passage of the county budget as a "battle waging in the press." The county delegation has not used its time or county resources buying space in the local newspaper to characterize its actions. Instead, what you have been reading is an attack by the press and those unhappy with some aspect of the county budget fostered by the press in order to move papers.

Please understand The Laconia Daily Sun has declined to print the side by side comparison of the 2016 actual spending versus the commissioners' proposed budget versus the delegation's appropriation unless I pay for advertising space, an action which was not a public service. My impression is it was self-serving bullying an action to which they are entitled. It also fosters use of cherry-picked facts for furtherance of a disagreement, which is good for circulation.

To address your statement that "...the delegation made significant cuts to the corrections portion of the budget...," let me observe that the actual spending by Belknap County in fiscal year 2016 for the Corrections Department was $3,481,101. The budget passed by the delegation for fiscal year 2017 appropriates $3,814,227. The budget for the Corrections Department was increased by $333,126, or about 9.56 percent. It is my hope this helps you understand what something about the source of your inquiry.

With respect to your statement that the cuts to the corrections portion of the budget "... will impact the new facility...," this is misinformation. The new facility, currently under construction, was funded last year. Its completion, which is expected late in Q3 (third quarter) or early in Q4, is not impacted by the operating budget of the Corrections Department. Those are separate funding items. The funding for the new facility was put into place in the 2016 county budget and is not an issue in the 2017 budget. The only activity will be changing from a construction type loan to permanent bonding once the facility is complete.

Your statement that the cuts to the corrections portion of the budget will "... potentially impact the Sheriff's Department..." too is misinformation. The Sheriff's Department is a separate department with its own budget.
To try to put into perspective what you may have heard, the total actual spending by Belknap County in fiscal year 2016 was $26,002,876. The appropriated budget for fiscal year 2017 is $27,487,463. That is a one year increase of $1,484,587, or about 5.7 percent. The delegation considered the prior history of county's actual spending, the commissioners' proposed budget, the presentations by the departments and we projected expected needs moving forward.

Finding the balance in the county budget is a difficult exercise. The delegation put in place a budget that is respectful of the requested spending levels, the functions of the county, the people served and the taxpayers' ability to pay. I would have included a copy of the budget comparison so you could assess the information you have gotten in context but the paper previously declined to print it.

The delegation also passed a motion giving the county commissioners the ability to control spending within each department without coming back to the delegation for permission to do so. The commissioners have the ability to set spending in each department as they so choose, up to the departmental total. The operation of the county is not part of the authority of the delegation. The delegation is responsible for appropriation of monies but little else short of malfeasance by county officials. Responsibility for operation of the county falls to the elected commissioners. Should they choose to behave irresponsibly it will be unfortunate.

It is my belief the unspecified information source you relied on in generation of your letter is painting a picture to elicit a response from you. My questions to you are: Was the information you received complete and correct? Are any threatened actions reasonable and likely? Is your request that the delegation further increase the county budget reasoned and reasonable?

Please understand this is only my personal response to what I read today, not a response by the county delegation.

State Rep. Marc Abear


(Editor's note: Due to a misunderstanding in our office as to what constitutes a "spread sheet," Rep. Abear's request for publication as a letter to the editor was denied. Below is the "table" he requested the newspaper print. The single sentence that proceeded it read as follows: "The voters and tax payers of Belknap County have been treated to a one-sided war in the local newspaper. The question should be: Is there a reason for concern or not? Below are the numbers. Please review them and judge for yourself.")

  • Category: Letters
  • Hits: 219