To The Daily Sun,
Rep. Frank Guinta wrote to me on Jan. 30: "As you may know, Rep. Mark Pocan (D-WI) introduced H.R. 5844, the Protect our Public Land Act in the 113th Congress. This legislation amends the Mineral Leasing Act and would ban hydraulic fracturing on public lands. It was referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources, and from there referred to the Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources.
Hydraulic fracturing is an energy extraction method in which pressurized liquid is injected deep into rock formations, creating cracks and freeing natural gas and petroleum. Raising my family in New Hampshire, I understand the importance of protecting our environment. The Granite State is home to thousands of acres of pristine forests, and people from around the world come to New Hampshire to enjoy our state's natural surroundings."
On Feb. 2 he wrote: "On January 28, the House of Representatives passed H.R. 351 with my support in an overwhelmingly bipartisan vote of 277-133. As you know, H.R. 351 was introduced by Rep. Bill Johnson (R-OH) on Jan. 14, 2015. If enacted, this legislation would expedite the approval process of exporting natural gas from the United States to trading partners around the world. It would require the Department of Energy to approve applications to construct a liquefied natural gas export terminal within a specified period after an environmental review has been conducted.
"Increasing LNG exports will help strengthen our economy and create American jobs while increasing energy security. It is estimated that by 2018, the construction of new LNG export projects will create up to 45,000 American jobs. It allows us to send a message to oppressive regimes that we are not reliant on them for our energy needs."
So fracking is not okay, but it's okay to export LNG (liquefied natural Gas) to our trading partners? Has this LNG been produced by some other method than fracking? Fracking is one of the topics covered by Naomi Klein, in her new book, "This Changes Everything." Fracking should be banned everywhere in the world. It's dirtier than coal, permanently polluting our groundwater, despite what a slick TV ad says. But if the LNG is already here, we should make some money on it? Is that the idea? If it's already here, we should do something with it?
It has become obvious to me that we need to wean ourselves from fossil fuels, conserve more energy, and invest in renewables. Creating jobs does not justify polluting our air, water, and soil, anywhere in the world, and I still wonder how many new jobs will actually be created. Fixing our broken infrastructure and installing solar panels and other forms of renewable energy would probably produce many more jobs, strengthen the economy more, and increase national security more, in the long run.
- Category: Letters
- Hits: 242