April 728x90TopBanner

Letter Submission

To submit a letter to the editor, please email us at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. Letters must contain the author's name, hometown (state as well, if not in New Hampshire) and phone number, but the number will not be published. We do not run anonymous letters. Local issues get priority, as do local writers. We encourage writers to keep letters to no more than 400 words, but will accept longer letters to be run on a space-available basis. Editors reserve the right to edit letters for spelling, grammar, punctuation, excessive length and unsuitable content.


Sanbornton needs better communication in town government

To The Daily Sun,

My name John Olmstead and I am running for selectman of the Town of Sanbornton.

In the 10 years that I have lived in Sanbornton I have been on the Zoning Board of Adjustments for six years, the Budget Committee for four years, and the Board of Directors of the Sanbornton Historical Society for five years. I have also served on our town's Pay Matrix Study Committee.

My wife and I love living in Sanbornton. We love the rural look, the feel of the town and the interaction with the town's people.

During our 10 years I have seen Sanbornton town government both externally and internally and I know that we have a good governing body. But, in the natural course of events, some things need more attention and the town needs new ideas. If elected, I will act to address these needs. Taxes, the transfer station, and communications are a few of my concerns.

The recent transfer station upset ties in with my concern for communication. Every effort must be made to keep the people informed, so town government is responsive to and reflective of the people. We all want our town to run smoothly.

My opponent has been a selectman for nine years, but now it is time for him to take a well-deserved rest and let someone with fresh ideas and management skills come on the board.

I hope every one of you will come out on March 8 and vote for your town government. I ask that you vote for me for selectman. Also, please come to the Town Meeting on March 9 and vote for your town's budget. This is your chance as a citizen legislator to have a voice in the budget process that affects the taxes we pay. I hope to see you on both days.

John Olmstead

  • Category: Letters
  • Hits: 420

Ramifications of polluting aquifer would be devastating to Belmont

To The Daily Sun,

It is Saturday, Feb. 13, 2016, and I am writing this letter to wish you all a belated Happy New Year. It is a new year so let's start it with protecting our aquifer. A number of people, including me, submitted a petition to the Town of Belmont to disallow additional industrial development above our water supply.

We, the people of Belmont, are fortunate to have a stratified drift aquifer created thousands of years ago by the glaciers. This aquifer is shallow to the surface of the ground and travels very slowly through a thick layer of sand and gravel flowing toward the Winnipesauke River (shallow means plus or minus 20 feet).

The towns of Tilton and Northfield also benefit from this natural resource. The fact that the aquifer is shallow to the surface makes our water supply vulnerable to pollution.

The Belmont Planning Board has approved a garbage transfer station which has been given the authority to haul a maximum of 3,000 tons of garbage a week or approximately 150,000 tons a year. The Planning Board also approved on a prior date, an asphalt plant and has the authority to approve a petroleum and propane bulk storage facilities.

My concern is that since the aquifer is shallow to the ground surface, it would not take much to contaminate our water supply with such enormous polluting industries. At the present time we have eight industrial polluting sites on top of our aquifer that are classified by the state as potential polluting sites.

Since we are pumping an average 800,000 gallons per day for all three towns where are we going to find another equivalent source of water supply for all three towns that has the same quality and quantity? Belmont taxpayers would have the financial responsibility to correct the problem they created. Of course that has not happened yet but it will happen in the future.

The financial ramifications of polluting the aquifer would be devastating to the town of Belmont. It would require the immediate expenditure of millions of dollars to correct the problem, which could force the town of Belmont into bankruptcy.

We, the taxpayers, would all be subject to the consequences, one being the inability to sell your property. Would you buy property in Flint, Michigan?

The primary solution to this very serious problem is not to allow any type of industry that has the potential to pollute the aquifer.

That is why the people of this town submitted a petition not to allow any future industrial development on top of our aquifer.

The future growth of our town and its people will depend on a healthy supply of clean water.

I would hope that the people of our town recognize that water is a very important resource for a healthy life and we are very fortunate to have an abundance of clean water as compared to the droughts in California and the pollution problems in Flint, Michigan.

I urge you to talk to your neighbors, write letters and become informed. If you have any questions, I would be very happy to show you how an aquifer works and discuss the quality and quantity issue. Above all please vote to protect the aquifer on March 8.

George Condodemetraky


  • Category: Letters
  • Hits: 334