Letter Submission

To submit a letter to the editor, please email us at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. Letters must contain the author's name, hometown (state as well, if not in New Hampshire) and phone number, but the number will not be published. We do not run anonymous letters. Local issues get priority, as do local writers. We encourage writers to keep letters to no more than 400 words, but will accept longer letters to be run on a space-available basis. Letters may be edited for spelling, grammar, punctuation and legal concerns.

 

'Climate clique' has grown from confident to cocky to arrogant

To The Daily Sun,

James Veverka, man-of-minutia, joins forces with the eco-tyrant scam artists. He asserts that meteorologists are unqualified to have an opinion on how humans may or may not be affecting climate change in any meaningful way. Those would be the scientists who are concerned with the processes and phenomena of the atmosphere in helping them forecast the weather. Climate refers to weather conditions prevailing in an area in general or over a long period. Synonyms include weather conditions and atmospheric conditions. Well, now I understand why Jim might think meteorologists would have as little understanding of climate change as progressives do with the complicated processes of capitalism.

Perhaps our resident contrarian-in-chief has not been apprised of the notion that historically, from Galileo to Einstein, scientific advances come from outside of consensus. S. Fred Singer notes, "The very notion of a scientific consensus is unscientific." Of course those of us who pay attention to real scientific measurements through honest to goodness atmospheric measurements, understand that public faith in climate models has hit rock bottom. Again, Singer reminds us, "if the science were as certain as climate activists pretend, then there would precisely one climate model and it would be in agreement with measured data. As it happens, climate modelers have constructed literally dozens of climate models. What they all have in common is a failure to represent reality, and a failure to agree with the other models".

Yet Fred tells us that the "climate clique" have nevertheless grown from confident to cocky to arrogant. Not so dissimilar to the way James treats those who disagree with him. Which coincidentally, is much the same way that the left treats anyone who disagrees with their ideology, but I digress.

Who is S. Fred Singer? He is professor emeritus at the University of Virginia and director of the Science and Environmental Policy Project. His specialty is atmospheric and space physics. Now I realize that these credentials do not make him as qualified to discuss climate change as those marvelous scientists who get paid to interpret climate models. Nevertheless, I am going to quote him one more time just to add a little more CO2 to the conversation. "Climate activists seem to embrace faith and ideology — and are no longer interested in facts".

Well, knock me over with a feather. liberal, progressive, leftists unite! There is gold in them thar climate model hills. Blindfold the public, send in the government bandidos and rob the middle class. There are so many more Solyndras to bankroll and so many more solar and wind turbine projects to throw money at. Sorry James, master obfuscator, but the jig is up. The hype has been deflated and this climate change consensus con game is all about greed, money, power and control of people's lives. It has absolutely zero to do with "saving the planet", wink, wink. James pretending he is not aware of that is like Hillary Clinton pretending she does not know she is in the top echelon of the 1 percent, while threatening to go after the 1 percent to help the poor and middle classes. You two kids are just so darn silly.

Russ Wiles

Tilton

  • Category: Letters
  • Hits: 620

Electing Hillary will be electing 'Bonnie & giving her keys to the bank

To The Daily Sun,
There is a new book out that is must reading for the Daily Sun writers crowd entitled "Clinton Cash" by Peter Schweitzer. It is an inside look at how foreign governments have made Bill and Hillary Clinton celebrities extraordinaire in what I thought was the despised 1 percent by the Democratic Party. The only wealth Democrats revile is when some Republican holds it. It was alleged Mitt Romney's millions made him out of touch with the common man while Democrats now proclaim Hillary is Dear Abby and Mother Teresa with her millions. Read the book whether you hate the Clintons, or love them.

The one sure conclusion the book offers, the Clinton Foundation runs as a semi philanthropic slush fund to increase the Clintons clout and power. Not just in America, but around the globe. The Clintons are truly unique in the annals of American politics. They have become so corrupt their next scandal isn't some surprise, it is expected.

There are few people in politics who could survive their level of deception. The Clintons not only survive on corruption and scandal, they thrive on it. Hillary Clinton just got caught wiping her computer clean of thousands of e-mails sent while conducting official business. Not only is she still in politics, she is running for president expecting to be coronated. If Romney had been caught "vaporizing: and "cleansing" his communications as governor he would have been hung by his private parts, left to be stripped to the bone by the political buzzards. We all need to stand in awe of the Clintons. They are indeed among the privileged few allowed to "lie and cheat" expecting to be adored for it.

How does the Clinton foundation corruption work? it is simple. Bill flies around the world disguised as a humanitarian and wise man almost always accompanied by "close friends" who have business interests in the country Bill is making speeches in. After the speeches, introductions are made to the "right people". Then obstacles his friends encountered doing business in these countries suddenly disappear. Very quickly donations arrive at the Clinton Foundation from his very beholding, close friends. This is all 100 percent documented.

The Clinton Foundation uranium story stands out above all and is the stuff legends are made of. In 2005 Bill meets with the unsavory, dictator of Kazakhstan. A Clinton "friend" accompanies him to the meeting. The guys name is Frank Guistra. Frank had been trying to buy some uranium mines in Kazakhstan without luck, impeded by government bureaucracy. Soon after the trip Frank gets his mines. Quickly, the Clinton Foundation gets a $31.3 million gift from a very grateful Frank. Soon after, Frank's company merges with another called Uranium One. Shareholders from Uranium One soon begin making out checks to "you guessed it", the Clinton Foundation. It doesn't end there. Not long after, wealthy Frank announces a $100 million joint venture called the Clinton Guistra Sustainable growth initiative.

It doesn't end there either. This is where Bonnie and Clyde tag team. Russia wanted to buy Uranium One, but the company had some mines in the U.S. This meant the deal required federal approval when Hillary was ecretary of state. Guess what? Deal done, mysteriously the U.S. mines of Uranium One got transferred to some mysterious holding company controlled by guess who? The Russians.

We won't be potentially electing Hillary Clinton president. We will be electing "Bonnie" Elizabeth Parker, offering her keys to the U.S. treasury. "Clyde" won't be far away playing the piano out front, smiling, recalling the deep pleasures sitting behind his presidential desk. The infamous, mistress, Monica in the blue dress appeared during Bill's presidency.

The only unknown in the next Clinton saga "who's playing the gigolo?" Will he be wearing a blue suit? Will he be wearing a "wire" connected to Iran or China? What ever mess happens, the Clintons will be given a "pass."

Tony Boutin
Gilford

  • Category: Letters
  • Hits: 703