To The Daily Sun,
I am responding to Susan Estrich's column which appeared in in the Aug. 3 Daily Sun.
Apparently, the Democratic nominee for president just can't answer questions without making prevaricating statements. Like saying to Chris Wallace that the director of the FBI said she had no emails that were classified.
She is riding on the coattails of her husband and is used to having her way by being the epitome of a stranger to the truth.
The Benghazi video lies are one example. As you so aptly state, the question should not be who you like or want to have a beer with, but who will work for the people, and not equivocate and pander to suit her purpose.
It is also true that absent the conspiracy and collusion involving Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Hillary Clinton would not nave been the Democratic nominee.
Being the most qualified to run for president of the United States does not compare to being untrustworthy and mendacious. The power of the president is to persuade and negotiate, but above all, be truthful, not licentious.
With all due respect to your esteemed background, you seem to have a clouded view of what Hillary Clinton accomplished as secretary of state.
- Category: Letters
- Hits: 536