A+ A A-

Political reads should be thought-provoking, not thought-providing

To the editor,
In response to Bernadette Loesch's reading and movie list:
You know what they say Bernadette. Garbage in, garbage out. I am familiar with one of the books and several of the movies and have appreciated them, but not to build a world view on them. Bernadette, dig deeper. Don't let these authors do the heavy work for you. If you accept there views whole they will lead you astray. Think for yourself. God Bless.
John Demakowski

Last Updated on Friday, 07 June 2013 08:05

Hits: 345

Chortling or not, I’m still waiting for explanation of Medicare vote

To the editor,
Today I read the Letter to the Editor that Rep. Dick Burchell of Gilmanton wrote in response to a letter I wrote a day earlier where I pointed out that he, and Representatives Worsman, Sylvia, and Cormier all voted not to accept Medicare dollars from the federal government, which allows the Belknap County Nursing home to provide short term rehabilitative services for those senior residents of Belknap County.
The program will cost an estimated $200,000 but is offset by revenue/reimbursement of $414,044 that Medicare will give the county.
Rep. Burchell spent his time writing a response to me where he said it was "unsophisticated and rude for me to chortle over someone else's opinion", rather than using the time and space in the paper for him to explain to the residents of Belknap County why he did not support this appropriation, which covers speech therapy, along with medications, testing, and x-rays to those in Belknap County who need these short term services with absolutely no cost to the taxpayers in Belknap County.
Rep. Burchell: regarding my questioning of yours and the other three reps who voted no, I'd like to remind you that I and every citizen have the right to question and even chortle if we choose. But I wasn't chortling at your vote; I disagreed with it because it lacked key elements of good governance, which includes not only participation but transparency, responsibility, accountability, and its responsiveness to the needs of its people.
Paula Trombi

Last Updated on Friday, 07 June 2013 08:02

Hits: 2472

Government needs the will, not new laws, to secure the border

To the editor,
The advertisements promoting the "gang of eight's" "Comprehensive Immigration Reform" are about as phony as their sponsor, "Americans for a Conservative Direction", and the bill itself. There is NOTHING CONSERVATIVE about rewarding criminals for their illegal acts, but that is what "Comprehensive Immigration Reform" does.
Advocates promise that the bill will close the border. But, they don't need new laws to close the border; they just need, but don't have, the will to close the border. They broke many (all) previous promises to close the border.
They promise that illegals won't be able to get (federal) welfare. But, that doesn't require a new law; they just need to enforce current laws. But once illegals are "legalized", they are eligible for many state and local welfare benefits funded by American taxpayers.
They promise that illegals will pay back taxes, but there is no mechanism for taxing unreported income. And, most illegals probably qualify for a subsidy (via the earned income tax credit) rather than owe taxes.
They say illegals will pay a fine. First the fine was $2,000, then $1,000. Now only the first installment of $100 "must" (if it isn't waived) be paid before getting amnesty. Whatever the fine, it is small compared to the approximately $16,000 of annual benefits received by each average illegal household.
While American citizens get promises, higher taxes, labor competition, and more crime, illegal aliens get amnesty/legalization/rewarded for breaking our laws, welfare, and the ability to take jobs from Americans and depress their wages.
"Comprehensive Immigration Reform" is another 1000 plus page bill full of goodies for everyone but the vast majority of American citizens. It is being sold to us with promises that are not intended to be fulfilled by people (politicians, businessmen, and special interest groups) who expect to benefit from the bill.
Even the name of the sponsor of many advertisements supporting this bill is intended to deceive the American people. "Americans for a Conservative Direction" is funded and controlled by three very liberal billionaires who wish to take advantage of another feature of the bill, greatly expanded visas for skilled workers. This will allow these billionaires to replace skilled, but costly, American workers with cheap immigrants.
No legislation is needed to fulfill the promised desirable features of this "Comprehensive Immigration Reform" bill. The desirable sounding promises are just intended to divert our attention from the real intent of the bill, to benefit politicians and payoff their political supporters, including rich businessmen and other special interests.
Tell Senators Ayotte and Shaheen and Congresswomen Shea-Porter and Kuster to reject this bill and demand enforcement of existing laws.
Don Ewing

Meredith, NH

Last Updated on Friday, 07 June 2013 07:51

Hits: 415

Noisy, well-funded minorities block the radical chance we need

To the editor,
Good letter by Brenda Baer about the prison/state school property on Parade Road in Laconia on May 15. "Bad investment", she said.
That land could have become a low-maintenance food producer if the principles of permaculture had been used years ago. Now it's been built on, paved, painted, sprayed, mowed and blown, and polluted.
And I agree with George Maloof's letter on June 3 that Monsanto is evil incarnate — more bad news for the environment. (And Kelly Ayotte thinks that the IRS is "Big Brother"!)
The March/April issue of Pacific Standard Magazine has an article about "astonishing sources of oil and gas all over the world", but scientists say that two-thirds of it should stay underground to prevent further global warming. Sea level is rising.
We need radical change, but noisy, moneyed minorities block progress.
Dick Devens
Center Sandwich

Last Updated on Thursday, 06 June 2013 10:37

Hits: 316

U.N. Small Arms Treaty is one step to taking away our freedoms

To the editor,
In yesterday's paper (June 4), there was an informative letter by George Dengel regarding the U.N. Agenda 21. We've been doing a lot of research on the subject and a whole new world is opening up to us. Thanks to Tim Carter and the Lakes Region Tea Party, to Glenn Beck and Ann Coulter for standing firm on the Constitution.
Mr. Dengel mentioned the U.N. Small Arms Treaty that has just been signed by 60 countries, and President Obama will be signing it when the translation has been done to his satisfaction. Any international treaty will trump our own Constitution. According to freedomoutpost.com, Mr. Obama may sign the treaty sometime before the end of August — when Congress will not be in town. The Senate has already signed a resolution to not ratify the treaty, and we must let our senators know we support them. Secretary of State John Kerry said that Obama will sign despite bipartisan resistance in Congress. This is all part of the U.N.'s sustainable development initiative signed by George Bush in 1992, and implemented by Bill Clinton under a Presidential Order, and has been in the works in all planning commissions around the country. The Master Plan calls for governments to take control of all land use and not leave decision making in the hands of private property owners. Look it up on line; this is a fact, their plan, not a conspiracy. The U.N. Small Arms Treaty is only one step to taking away our freedoms.
Hal & Peggy Graham

Last Updated on Thursday, 06 June 2013 10:33

Hits: 385

The Laconia Daily Sun - All Rights Reserved
Privacy Policy
Powered by BENN a division of the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Login or Register