Letter Submission

To submit a letter to the editor, please email us at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. Letters must contain the author's name, hometown (state as well, if not in New Hampshire) and phone number, but the number will not be published. We do not run anonymous letters. Local issues get priority, as do local writers. We encourage writers to keep letters to no more than 400 words, but will accept longer letters to be run on a space-available basis. Letters may be edited for spelling, grammar, punctuation and legal concerns.


‘Bush tax cuts’ provided us with 50 straight months of growth

To the Editor,

This is in response to the letter of Attorney/Professor Dave Pollak, that was printed in the Thursday issue of the Laconia Daily Sun. On occasion, when someone is critical of what I have written, rather than getting into a spitting match in the paper, I will send them some information so that they can see the pragmatism that went into creating my viewpoint. In the case of the attorney/professor, he seems to prefer the spitting match, so here goes.

Since prior to the implementation of the Patient Protection Affordable Care Act (PPACA, aka "Obamacare"), I have been somewhat involved in helping people become aware of the resources that were, and are available to help them through the basic understanding of the PPACA and its procurement processes. While I don't consider myself an expert, I will claim a reasonable amount of knowledge. Now, to the attorney/professor's comments.

— He argues against my claims that the sheer volume of words in the PPACA have created a level of uncertainty. Perhaps the attorney/professor is not aware that as part of that act, an employee is considered to be "full time" if he or she works 30 or more hours per week. That has resulted in many people being limited to under 30 hours per week. Depending on the number of employees, if the employee is full-time, the company must provide them with access to the PPACA. Perhaps too, the attorney/professor has not read much about how employers have reacted to the negative impact that has had on both the employees and the employers. Here's just one of many articles he may want to peruse, http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2015/01/07/businesses-push-for-40-hour-workweek-in-obamacare-definition.

— The attorney/professor then goes on to state, ". . .since the provisions of the ACA have gone into affect, more than 11 million jobs have been created, and the unemployment rate has been cut nearly in half." He seems to ignore the fact that 10,000 "Baby boomers" are retiring every day, that is 3.6 million per year. Some of those "jobs created" are simply to fill ones that have been vacated and are not a net gain. In a recent column I provided information on how the Department of Labor arrives at the unemployment number. I also provided facts and figures on the actual Department of Labor figures on the Labor Participation Rate, which just happens to be the worst rate since 1978. Another fact is, that since January of 2000 our population has grown from 282.2 to 321.2 million people, a 13.8 percent increase. However, during that same period, our Labor Participation Rate has gone from 96.28 to 98.3 million, only a 2.1 percent increase. What that tells us is that we are adding jobs at a rate of only 15 percent of our population growth . . . that's a road to serfdom and is unsustainable.

— He then goes on to talk about "Bob and his fellow fundamentalist free marketeers", and claims that I am an "evangelist for unrestrained capitalism." He then lists all the reasons he feels the government should regulate ". . . child labor, minimum wage, and anti-trust laws and the eight-hour workday . . ." While I agree that things such as child labor should not be permitted, the minimum wage issue is worthy of vigorous debate as it is now being used more as pap for unions and a salve for those who have not invested in developing the skills necessary to earn a higher level of income. The anti-trust issue should also be hotly debated, particularly since the government does not want any private enterprise to be so large as to stifle competition but they, the government, feel they can dictate themselves as a bona fide healthcare monopoly. As to the eight-hour workday, the attorney/professor might want to thank a gentleman named Henry Ford, not the government.

— As to words about ending the "Bush tax cuts" he might want to do a little research at the website, http://www.usgovernmentspending.com/. He evidently doesn't recall that prior to President Clinton leaving office, the internet "Dot.Com" bubble burst and it had a devastating effect on our economy. That was followed by the terrorist attacks that took more lives than did the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor. These two events drove our economy down severely and caused a serious downturn in Federal Revenues. Those "Bush tax cuts" turned around that downturn and provided our country with fifty straight months of revenue growth. Liberals continue to try to denigrate President Bush over those tax cuts, but they did the job immensely better than our current president has done with his failed trillion-plus dollar "jobs ready," and "Solyndra" stimulus investments.

— I would also like to point out a few problems that probably concerned most businesses and millions of citizens that seem not to concern Mr. Pollak. For example, prior to the PPACA being rolled out, the president vigorously assured every citizen that they could keep their doctor, their insurance policy, and their hospital. We know that to have been a lie that was, knowingly, often repeated. We know too, that MIT professor Jonathan Gruber acknowledged that passing of the PPACA was dependent on the people being too stupid to understand it. We know too, that the software budget for processing the PPACA information from the citizens was an absolute mismanaged nightmare. The system was brought on line with no security for all the private information that the system demanded the citizens provide.

We know too, that the system did not have the ability to have an electronic, digital handoff to the appropriate insurance companies the citizens selected. Everything had to be printed and forwarded to each company . . . an unbelievable situation. We know too, that Oregon never could bring their exchange on line and Maryland and Massachusetts also had significant problems (http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/obama-administration-prepares-to-take-over-oregons-broken-health-insurance-exchange/2014/04/24/ff9aa220-cbc4-11e3-95f7-7ecdde72d2ea_story.html)

And of course, right here in our own state, our single insurance provider only included 16 of the state's 26 hospitals in their coverage. This was a gross and unforgivable injustice to many people in the state, particularly those in our northern areas. Not to be overlooked is information easily available in Wikipedia that the federal system was budgeted to cost $93.7 million, but a whopping cost overrun for the failed system drove the cost up to $1.5 billion. (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_failed_and_overbudget_custom_software_projects)

As long as this response already is, I have chosen not to include other "uncertainties" or some cost and deductible information for New Hampshire, when the plan was kicked off. If he would like, I would be happy to send a chart with the detailed information to the Attorney/Professor. As I mentioned at the beginning of this (too) long letter, I usually prefer to not get into a spitting match.

Bob Meade


  • Category: Letters
  • Hits: 462

Before liberalism, kids could go out to play without danger

To the Daily Sun,

Once again Henry Osmer is content to cheer on the name-callers, the personal attackers, the smears and slanders while throwing his own brand of slime too. One thing we do not hear these days from the folks on the left is any meaningful discussion of their candidates. Well it's easier to throw mud then defend proven liars and incompetents, I guess. They are all fruit from the poison tree, to use a common legal phrase.

I'm speaking of Obama who is easily the most prolific proven liar in modern times. They try to defend his actions like this agreement with Iran that 75 percent of Americans are against, his health care bill, still rejected by a majority, and so many other things that are now too numerous and well known to write about.

Notice how silent all the left's writers to this paper are regarding Hillary's email/server problems? Their studious avoidance of it tells us why they resort to anything except talking about her.

Well, next up is the Socialist, Bernie Sanders, not really a party member, but actually is more representative of modern progressive thinking then they would have you believe. Never mind that socialism has failed everywhere it has been tried. Remember the Soviet Union? The greatest socialist experiment in history. They had to plunder all the Eastern European countries for decades after World War II and still they went belly-up.

The U.S. rebuilt all of Western Europe, Japan, the Philippines, protected them militarily and financially ever since, due to our capitalist/free market system. You're welcome.

Funny though while our socialist euro friends got to work 32 to 38 hours a week, got four to six weeks vacations, housing, medical and educations subsidized or free they are now having problems big time. All those freebies are getting hard for governments to pay for. Who could ever have predicted that?

But that's exactly what progressives are looking to try to force feed us here. Sure follow the worst example as long as they win any election, the good of the nation be damned.

I keep telling myself not to get tied up with the left writers trying to distract but sometimes just can't help it. As I say they do not want to discuss real issues, the important ones like job loss, wage stagnation national security and such.

Lately they are cheering the fact that big business, banks and Wall Street is booming. Isn't it funny a few years ago those were all the bad guys to hear them tell it, but now that they have nothing else to hang their hats on, it's just so great.

So working families, poor or middle class, how does the future for your children look after seven years of "Hope and Change?" Minority families, has liberal politics made all those hopes and dreams come true? All the rest of us, do we live in a safer more peaceful world? Will your children be safe or will crazies or terrorist do them harm today, tomorrow?

I remember before liberalism kids could go out to play all around town without danger, except from crossing a street. Now every psycho, pervert and nut job has "rights" and liberals want terrorists to have them, too. Great, shell we make them citizens so they can vote, too?

Steve Earle


  • Category: Letters
  • Hits: 499