To The Daily Sun,
I just read that Americans were arrested for protesting as the federal government was trying to bus in illegals into Murrieta, Calif. It is our right to protest, especially when our president is not enforcing the law which effects our security.
We were celebrating the Fourth of July. The federal government is more concerned with finding a location for the illegal "children" (some are teenagers) than our veterans.
Protesting is a right and yet Americans were put in jail and the illegals, after processing, go free to show up when there is a court case for deportation. Ninety percent do not show up for their court case. Ninety percent — and we still let them go and they live here and demand benefits and citizenship.
I read a report that one reporter said that calling illegal immigrants "illegal" is like using the "n" word to blacks. Why is it when liberals do not get what they want they bring in the race card?
They are illegal immigrants. Illegal. There is a law about immigration in this country, although our current president does not seem to want to enforce it. And he wonders why there is such a huge number coming in. He in essence is telling them to come in and they will get amnesty.
The U.S. Department of Health requires immigrants to have proof of vaccination of measles, mumps, rubella, polio, tetanus, diphtheria, pertussis, haemophililus trains, hepatitis A and B, rotavirus, meningococcus, chicken pox, pneumonia and flu.
Border towns cannot deal with the influx of illegals. They have diseases that medical personnel were told not to tell the public. Who is going to pay to vaccinate them before they are set loose on the public?
Massachusetts is sending homeless to western towns. There is an influx of immigrants into towns like Springfield. I love liberals who love having the illegals around. But are the illegals living in Lexington and Concord? No way. They are in Springfield, Lawrence, Holyoke, North Adams, and Chicopee, Mass.
New Hampshire is just a state away. Manchester is already having a problem with homeless and requested additional funding for them. Will the immigrants come to New Hampshire. Why not? Will we have to divert funds for veterans and citizens of New Hampshire for illegals.
I feel for the kids (By the way, the parents are following shortly after them into the country), but our country cannot afford this. The countries they are coming from are not more dangerous now than in the past, so that is a poor excuse. The news agencies take pictures of the younger children. But many are your male teenagers. They will take the temporary summer jobs and full-time jobs away from our children.
New Hampshire cannot afford this. We must support our citizens who live in states at the border.
A few years ago, our president said our borders were secure and we did not have to spend more money on fences or border patrol. If our border is so secure, then how do kids get across?
Put them on a military cargo plane and send them back to the countries they came from. Let them apply for immigration legally and then come as my grandparents did.
In the Obama administration, there is a decline in deporting of illegal immigrants. There is a decline in the cases the administration cases and a decline in deportations of about 43 percent. Yes 43 percent. Our president is the cause of the increase of illegals coming over the border.
We are trillions in debt. Our president wants billions to deal with the illegal children immigrants. Yet he thumbs his nose at Congress for wanting to take him to court for not following the law. At a speech he told Congress to sue him. He snubs his nose at Congress and yet asks for more money.
No more money. Send the illegals back and let them apply for immigration. Follow the law, as I and you have to follow the law. We must support the states on the border who are the first step in the trip of the illegal aliens. It is our jobs that we must protect. It is our citizens and our borders we must protect.
Last Updated on Wednesday, 09 July 2014 08:50
To The Daily Sun,
Please read Jon Hoyt's letters to the editor dated June 26 and 28 for a fascinating read on how a liberal, utopian spin doctor escapes reality while pretending to have a clue about what the heck he is talking about. Now, if Jon chooses to chastise me for labeling him as such, then he might want to start making more sense and stop sounding like he actually believes President Obama is a better president than Jimmy Carter.
As we try to understand the world according to Hoyt from Plymouth, try this on for size: He says, while referencing the GOP, "They love it when you have to depend on government handouts because they are in control of you." Geez, apparently I have been under the illusion that it is the Democrats who like to have citizens on government largesse. You know, nanny statists and all that. He goes on to say that the GOP has done nothing about jobs and the economy. Again, seems I have been under the illusion that Democrats control two-thirds of our current government and that Harry Reid's Senate has been a graveyard for any common sense economic legislation. Jon then bemoans the fact that there won't be any social programs coming out of D.C. Perhaps we should get rid of all the ones that haven't worked for decades before we throw some new ones out there to see what sticks. Whadaya think Jon?
The previous leftist gibberish was from his June 26 letter. His June 28 letter is even better. He says, "Central American countries advertise Obama as tough on immigration which means there is no open invitation to come to the USA." But then he claims that the young and female are easily manipulated and translation problems can make them think they are welcome in our country. So is Jon really saying the parents of these kids have such poor comprehension of their native language that they are confused about our porous border situation and amnesty inclinations? Perhaps these hazy, lazy, crazy days of summer have caused Jon some cerebral disorientation.
President Obama has refused to obey our immigration laws while our Border Patrol agents are too busy changing diapers and feeding babies to do the job of protecting our borders and keeping us secure. The Democrats are too busy using the obfuscation techniques of Saul Alinsky to deal with this crisis in any meaningful way. They would rather play silly semantic games of feel-good, social justice nonsense. Illegal alien, undocumented worker, illegal immigrant, migrant, and now, "unlawful migration." The main goal of the Democrats is to ensure we don't hurt the feelings of anyone who is here illegally.
Here's a reality check for Jon. Congressman Bob Goodlatte has forwarded four reasonable immigration bills to the Senate where Harry "the feckless wonder" Reid sneers, throws them in a drawer and shakes his head in utter disdain.
Here is what congressman Bob Goodlatte has proposed: for some illegal immigrants, under certain conditions, there would be a path for them to get in line with those who have applied to come here in the proper legal manner. It addresses border security, interior enforcement, guest visas and high skilled worker visas. A comprehensive, step by step, incremental and fully public approach.
Evidence is continuing to pile up suggesting that President Obama orchestrated this "unlawful migration" with untold thousands from Central America flocking here, assuming their dream of asylum will be realized. I think Lou Dobbs is right on when he says that our president is ignoring the very civil rights that he claims he aspires to as the leader of this country. Lou goes on to assert that Obama is crushing the civil rights of all American citizens, including all the immigrants who came her legally.
One talk show host recently said that if Richard Nixon was seen as the imperial president, then Barack Obama must be seen as the rogue president. That seems spot on given our dear leader's pronouncement that he will go it alone to get his social justice transformation completed. After all the slap-down decisions against Obama's policies and executive orders by the Supreme Court, that takes an uncommon level of chutzpah. Wouldn't you say so Jon? Probably not. Such is the lot of leftist letter writers who choose to live in the la la land of imaginary, liberal utopia.
Last Updated on Tuesday, 08 July 2014 11:02
To The Daily Sun,
Mr. Boutin, in his concentration on capitalizing as many words as he can and his blindly spitting venom, shows a callous disregard for the facts and a sad lack of concern for anyone but those who already have it made.
The attitude that shows through his rants is a prime example as to why our United States is going to "hell in a hand basket". Along with the rightwing majority on the Supreme Court, corporate greed, governors and those in Congress who have been bought and paid for by the one percenters.
He seems to have a personal hatred of President Obama — like many of the older white men who seem to be discombomulated by the fact that a man like Barack Obama is in the White House. How much more insulting do you want to be toward the President of the United States? How many more lies and misleading statements will you write about his administration? Are you being arrogant on purpose?
Who knows where to begin with the lies you want us to believe in your letter: "You'd Think Obama Would Be Last Person to Attack Other's Freedom's"? "Three time loser", huh? Making recess appointments has been the right and privilege of many presidents up to and including this one. Why does this suddenly bother you now, and never before?
"...another knockdown blow to union power"'. Huh? Unions are the very reason why we had a middle class in his country. Before unions child labor was routine, as were a 60-80 hour work week, a 7 day work week, substandard wages, sweat shops, unsafe working conditions, no protections for workers against abuse, no overtime pay, no compensation in the form of health benefits such as sick time, no remuneration to families who had a loved one die because of horrific working conditions. By Mr. Boutin's logic he should be calling for the return of slavery. Bingo — no unions, and total control over their labor. Unions also helped lead to regulations to prevent the sale of unsafe food and other products.
"All they do is drive up costs for every person buying their product or service.". Huh? How about facing the reality that manufacturers have taken their businesses overseas to countries where they can hire very cheap labor, produce inferior goods, with no safeguards in place, then in turn ship them back here and sell them to consumers? Do they then lower the price we all pay? Do they then raise their workers' salaries at the same rate as their profits increase? No: they use higher profits to hike their executives' salaries, and to buy lobbyists and politicians to make sure that American workers are pushed down even more..
"Unions never stop trying to increase their treasure chest...' Huh? How about all of the profits made over the years by the one percenters who own companies and threaten their workers with retribution if they join a union? Corporations are the very last entity who want unions interfering with their labor practices. You write with a straight face about this knowing full well that corporations use their profits to fund PACs and think tanks and puppet-politicians.
"The Supremes determined 'Obamacare' treads all over the religious freedoms guaranteed under the Constitution." Huh? Of course you are referring to Hobby Lobby. If the owners of that company were not fundamentalist Christians but were, say, conservative Muslims, I bet we wouldn't have heard a peep from you about the issue. This country is supposed to have a strict separation of church and state. This Supreme Court is perverting the intent of the Founding Fathers.
On your last point: the other setback for the entire United States is when the Supreme Court decided that we no longer need voter rights' protection. With that sweep of the broad brush governors who "rule" their states from the right are happily restricting days and times of voting in elections, restricting registration, using voter ID requirements specifically tailored against the poor, seniors, and the young, and other measures to erode one of our most basic freedoms. All the time they lie by bringing up the red herring of "voter fraud." When we were in school, we were taught that in America voters choose their government. With voter suppression government is now trying to choose its voters.
From your letters it appears that you want to bring us back to your "good old days" of the 18th century. If you want to return to that life, please don't try to drag the rest of America back with you. And remember: in your Utopia there were no keyboards, and thus no way for you to capitalize at will.
Last Updated on Tuesday, 08 July 2014 10:52
To The Daily Sun,
As usual, the GOP, led by a confused leader named Boehner, has found a reason to impeach or sue the president (using immigration as an excuse) and they even learned a new word to use. "Lawlessness" is the new word and has been used by Boehner, Bachmann, Cruz, Rubio and more. They went right from Impeach to Lawlessness while skipping the J and K.
The GOP refuses to do anything about immigration, so might as well sue Obama for not doing what the GOP has refused to do. Sounds confusing to me too. But Boehner, along with many of the GOP, keep on pointing fingers to blame Obama for things he didn't do. Just because they don't like the laws Bush, HR-7311, signed we still have to follow them until they are changed.
Will the Congress allocate the money the president wants to fight this problem? I doubt if the Tea Party types will allocate it, but the reasonable GOP might be convinced too.
It is time to stop the political games and misleading the public. Right, Gov. Perry? Governor, you do sound like you're back on those pain killers again — whoops. If these were your relatives or friends you would do whatever you could to help them. As a guess probably 70 to 80 percent of these immigrants are decent-hard working people. If they could find jobs (remember that word Boehner), they would do whatever just to stay here to make a honest living. But there are also many home-grown citizens who would like to do the same if they had jobs. And there are many legal immigrants who would do the same if given the chance. So it all comes down to some type of work.
We have a country that needs a good cleaning, infrastructure that needs rebuilding, industry that needs to be reinvented and invested in. Invested in by people — not like Mitt Romney, who would rather rape it, close it up and pocket the assets — but by people who want it to grow, expand and last for a few generations. People who will pay a fair living wage. We all know it can be done but how is the question. Just because the Statue of Liberty faces east doesn't mean we only help those coming from the east.
Last Updated on Tuesday, 08 July 2014 10:48
To The Daily Sun,
While most people don't express publicly their views on city matters, particularly the budget, I know they do care how we, the city councilors, spend their money. Not just the amount but on what we spend it for.
People do care about their taxes going up, and people who rent, do care about rent increases and where that rent money goes. It is important that all citizens are considered when making decisions with their money and that is why we have a diversified council. We have had lawyers, bankers, CEOs, Realtors, farmers, workers, and retired people over the years and it is their duty to consider not only their constituents, but all the people of Laconia when it comes to spending their money. It affects every person.
Being one of those retired, ordinary people, I am in and about the city every day, visiting local stores and meeting people I know as well as people continually coming up to me and expressing their thoughts and giving me their support, so it was very disappointing that no one appeared at the public hearing on June 22.
There are items that might need to be cut, and again there are issues that need to be funded that are not in the budget. The safety and well-being of all of us rests with our great Police Department which at present is very overworked but still doing a great job in trying to keep crime and drug problems down so that we may walk about our city with a sense of security. I am supporting the hiring of a full-time or part-time officer to help in this endeavor. It is not in the present budget.
The School Department budget is $1 million more than last year. I advocate cutting this $60,000. I am also advocating other cuts in the city budget so we can reduce the projected tax rate increase of 31 cents to 25 cents or less.
Regarding the Fire Department, we accepted a grant from the federal government for four firefighters that would pay for their salaries, health insurance and retirement, etc., to the tune of over $600,000 for two years. In the budget there is a five-week salary-and-benefits line for these firefighters as their term will expire before the end of the budget year. We would save $32,000 by cutting this line. To continue employing the four firefighters that were funded by a grant, it will cost the city close to $400,000 per year more in next year's budget and every year thereafter. Grants are great until they run out. We were not committed to retaining them and in fact, the council originally rejected the grant for this reason.
I also advocate cutting some of the WOW trail's $15,000, simply because just a few months ago, we gave them $400,000 from TIF funds. Cutting $25,000 from Court Street Study was also recommended, but these funds can come from the TIF fund, not the budget.
There are some other minor cuts and some increased revenue that should get us to at least the 25 cent tax rate figure and allow us to do something with the Police Department's needs.
When doing the budget, you can't just look at the present year. You have to be looking ahead to the next year and the year after. Are we going to be able to afford an additional $400,000 for the four firefighters hired because of grant funds? Are we making progress to avoid the Cadillac tax coming because of the Affordable Care Act. What effect will the Belknap County Prison have on Laconia next year or the year after? Not only will it be significant in itself, but the new prison will require additional personnel and that figure will be substantial.
Ward 4 City Councilor
Last Updated on Tuesday, 08 July 2014 10:43