Letter Submission

To submit a letter to the editor, please email us at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. Letters must contain the author's name, hometown (state as well, if not in New Hampshire) and phone number, but the number will not be published. We do not run anonymous letters. Local issues get priority, as do local writers. We encourage writers to keep letters to no more than 400 words, but will accept longer letters to be run on a space-available basis. Editors reserve the right to edit letters for spelling, grammar, punctuation, excessive length and unsuitable content.


MetroCast channels 25 & 26 are not available in Sanbornton

To The Daily Sun,

The Daily Sun had an article regarding a movie to be shown on MetroCast Channel 25 on Friday and Saturday nights. We were looking forward to seeing this old movie, but we could not access channel 25, even though we have expanded basic service.
I called MetroCast and was told sometimes when there is nothing on that channel, it will say there has been an interruption in our service. But we could not get channel 25 at any time.
So I called Metrocast again, and they sent out a technician. He spent four hours at our house and couldn't get it to work. Then and only then, we were told that Sanbornton (and some other towns with Metrocast) do not get channel 25 or 26. Yet we are paying for the entire package, and cannot get it all.
This is a warning to anyone not getting channels 25 or 26.

Hal and Peggy Graham

(Editor's note: Lakes Region Public Access channels on the MetroCast system are available only is those communities that chose to support public access TV through their town government's annual budget. The fee each community is asked to pay is based on the number of MetroCast subscribers in that community.)

  • Category: Letters
  • Hits: 480

Let's deprot illegals carefully, perhaps using a priority system

To The Daily Sun,

Going in to 2017: 31 Republican governors, Republican majority in Senate, Republican majority in House, Republican presidency.

Looks as if the adults are back in charge. Change is on the horizon.

For me, a retiree, the change will likely be limited to a slight increase in my meager stock market investments. Increase as a result of the philosophical change from one of anti-business to one of pro-business. As American businesses prospers so do the American people.

Most importantly, for my children and grandchildren: A better life as U.S. citizens. Now that the country's leadership is refocused away from globalism, patriotism can come out of the closet. By rejecting open borders, anchor babies, and sanctuary cities U.S. citizenship becomes again precious, special. Perhaps priceless.

I think legal immigration should be streamlined and simplified so that we get the best of the best to become U.S. citizens. We need legal immigrants who strive to become English speaking, productive, tax-paying American citizens. These people should be welcomed, encouraged. Illegal immigration should be discouraged. Enforce current laws, strengthen our borders, punish offenders. Support border agents and immigration officials who do their jobs well. Deport illegals carefully, perhaps by using a priority system where those convicted of crimes go first. If these criminals return they should receive a fixed jail sentence, incarcerated perhaps in Guantanamo (if it remains a U.S. possession). Develop a plan that treats long-term, productive, otherwise law-abiding illegals with dignity, giving them a path to citizenship, one that's fair to those who didn't jump the line. Defund sanctuary cities. Strengthen voter ID laws.

These steps will reduce crime by removing many of the troublemakers from our lands and by stemming the flow of illegal drugs. Once done, our neighborhoods should become safer for everyone. Most importantly this plan will reverse the blatant ploy to populate red states with a majority dependent class, comprised in large part of illegal immigrants who'll be forever dependent on liberal politicians to redistribute taxpayer money to them in return for their support. Once rewarded with health care, education, housing, food and clothing the quid-pro-quo is simple: vote liberal.

But you must be a legal citizen to vote, right? Wrong! Unbelievable as it may sound, Wikipedia lists California, Illinois, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Vermont, West Virginia, Wyoming, and Washington, D.C., as requiring no form of identification at all to vote. This is right up Constitution-busting Obama's alley who himself said on Nov. 6, in response to a question from an illegal immigrant journalist about punishment for illegals voting: "This is not true," Obama said. "... first of all, when you vote, you are a citizen yourself, and there is not a situation where the voting rolls somehow are transferred over and people start investigating, et cetera. The sanctity of the vote is strictly confidential in terms of who you voted for ..."

In my opinion when the elected leader of these United States encourages people to commit crime, and illegal immigrants voting in U.S. elections is a crime, that is solid ground for impeachment.

Be that as it may, once the home front is back on a path that sees us preserving the sanctity of the vote, defending our borders, protecting our citizens, growing our economy, regaining American exceptionalism, perhaps we can again turn our focus outward. With a stable America, perhaps we, in partnership with our friends and allies, can start developing plans to make things better for everyone.

Dave Rivers

  • Category: Letters
  • Hits: 504