A+ A A-

Adjourning the meeting without public input was a slap in the face

To The Daily Sun,

I was appalled after attending the Belknap County Convention meeting yesterday. The chairman, Ms. Worsman, asked for adjourning the meeting without any public input.

This is yet another attempt to abuse her power as chairman. Moving the meetings an hour away to Concord and then prohibiting public input is absurd. I cannot believe your caucus believes that having constituents drive an hour each way for a meeting held at noontime would be conducive for open and transparent government.

Shame on you, Ms. Worsman, for making it impossible for hard working-class people to attend these meetings. It is a slap in our face not to allow us to ask questions after driving an hour each way to attend these meetings.

For those of you who missed the 3-4-14 meeting please click the below link to watch — the 3/19-14 meeting will be downloaded soon.


Lisa Merrill


Last Updated on Thursday, 20 March 2014 11:05

Hits: 432

Our energy policies are friendly to developers, hostile to residents

To The Daily Sun,

The horror stories regarding negative impacts on residents tied to the development of the Groton Wind power plant continue to mount. The toll on families across our region builds while the governor and many in the Legislature appear to care less.

Over the past few weeks many of our local residents traveled to Concord to tell their true-life experiences living next to the Groton Wind power plant. As expected, our politicians half-listened as they had other things to do. Many of our local residents were adding to and reinforcing true Groton Wind concerns. The worse part is that the issues are greater and broader than previously defined by Iberdrola. There is no need to repeat these problems, as we video taped all testimonies and put them on our Facebook page for all to see.

But there is a need to once again ask the governor and those in the Legislature pushing for rapid wind deployment in our community. What's the rush? We, as a state, produce more than enough electricity. Heck, we've been exporting excess electricity for decades.

Has New Hampshire, a state that has its own Constitution and prides itself on protecting individual's rights, now chosen to sell out to industrial wind developers?

If Massachusetts intends to outsource New Hampshire land in order to meet their so called "green energy quota," why must New Hampshire residents pay for any of it? And what about our "green energy quota"?

It's more important for our state to step back and review its energy policy and development regulations to get things done correctly rather than doing so quickly. At this point, the state has embarked on an energy policy course that's friendly to industrial wind developers, hostile to New Hampshire residents, threatens tourism, threatens our watersheds and does nothing to improve the quality of life that we've all become accustom to. This is wrong and it's bad public policy.

Eventually, with many thanks to residents who publicly expressed their nightmarish Groton Wind stories, the tide will turn where a more viable and achievable energy policy can be developed without destroying people, lives and health.

Ask questions, demand answers and pound the table if you don't get them. Now is the time, not later.

Ray Cunningham


Last Updated on Thursday, 20 March 2014 11:01

Hits: 142

Local monsignor should resign from board of hateful organization

To The Daily Sun,

Sometimes I wonder if Pope Francis is making any headway here in New Hampshire. From all appearances, (he's) not. Case in point is what I gleaned off the Internet below.

A prominent Catholic priest leads St. Joseph Cathedral here in New Hampshire, and is a recent former member of the Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace. But he also serves on the Board of Directors of the Catholic Family and Human Rights Institute, whose president made headlines last week for his remarks that "the human-hating people that run modern universities should all be taken out and shot." While the president was forced to apologize for his "poorly chosen words," his organization continues to work for the passage of draconian laws criminalizing homosexuality.

The Southern Poverty Law Center has warned that this organization is aiding and abetting the anit-LGBT forces in countries whose anti-gay violence is prevalent. Monsignor Anthony Frontiera's involvement is helping this hate group masquerade as a legitimately Catholic organization, and undermining Pope Francis's efforts to focus the church on Christ's radical message of love. The monsignor needs to resign from this hate group's Board of Directors.

George Maloof


Last Updated on Thursday, 20 March 2014 10:57

Hits: 167

I will do my best to live up to the trust voters showed in me

To The Daily Sun,

My thanks to Gilmanton voters for returning me to the town Budget Committee. I will do my best to live up to the trust they have shown by their vote.

Stan Bean


Last Updated on Thursday, 20 March 2014 10:51

Hits: 197

Put pot behind store counters & it’ll be harder to get for teens

To The Daily Sun,

What? decriminalization or legalization of marijuana? What has become of our pristine society? Have I been living in a rabbit hole, because to think that our government, which has never steered us wrong, which is full of non-hypocritical, humble, truth speaking people of the highest values whom always look out for what's best for us, is now considering legalizing an incredibly toxic, lethal drug that has paralyzed our society? We must side with the champions of life such as state Sens. Jeanie Forrester or Andrew Hosmer who are speaking up against such blasphemy as legalizing a drug that has been so detrimental to our way of life.

Okay, back to reality, the people mentioned above are beating the war drums and revving up the fear mongering rhetoric of the 1920s. I've thought about the issue for years and of course being a father has weighed heavy on my conclusions, and have it broken down on three fronts.

First, will it turn our children into brainless hooligans? Lisa Morris, director of Lakes Region Partnership for Public Health, gives out some statistics on polls on current students who use (24 percent), but it begs the question that she never touches. Being as it's illegal now, how did these kids get marijuana? The answer is from dealers. If you put that marijuana in stores, kids now will have much less access to it. You say 44 percent of high school kids say it is easy to get? If legalized, it's now the same as kids asking adults to buy alcohol, which I'm sure happens, but not in the numbers that kids are going to strange adults houses now to get weed. I wonder what percent of kids think alcohol is easy to get? Putting the drug behind counters and enforcing the laws for minors the same as alcohol would make many young twenty-somethings have to actually get a job.

Secondly, stop acting like we're talking about heroin here, which is a real, actual problem. Although its primary active ingredients (THC and other cannabinoids) produce psychoactive effects at doses of a couple of milligrams, they do not have lethal effects. Unlike other psychoactive drugs, including alcohol, aspirin, opiates, nicotine and caffeine, cannabis is not known to cause fatal overdoses.

The Drug Enforcement Administration's own administrative judge Francis Young, in his 1988 decision recommending legalization of medical marijuana, wrote, "Marijuana, in its natural form, is one of the safest therapeutically active substances known to mankind." From animal experiments, it has been estimated that a lethal does of cannabis would be 20,000 to 40,000 times a normal dose: approximately 40 to 80 pounds of marijuana. No deaths from cannabis overdose have ever been recorded. Saying that Colorado has shown significant increases in marijuana involved traffic fatalities and emergency room visits is irresponsible and fear-mongering. How many accidents happen in New Hampshire or around the world that one or both of the drivers may have had a bit of marijuana in their systems? What? You don't know? Show me statistics and references.

Maine has decriminalized marijuana since 1976, and apparently it never became an issue with raising traffic or ER fatalities. I will not fear for my life on the roads or on the streets if it is legalized. That's just silly. But I am concerned if my wife and child are out driving on a Friday or Saturday night when a higher number of drunk or buzzed drivers are out and about.

Lastly, politicians always wax philosophical about new ideas and the future, but mostly it's all just hollow promises. These bills to decriminalize or legalize marijuana were spawned and backed by the majority of the citizens in these states and it's working well.

You criticize the businesses popping up in Colorado, at the same time piling on taxes and permits necessary to run small businesses here in New Hampshire, ranked 50th in the country for starting a small business. It's the dawn of new entrepreneurships, and you sit here trying to keep us in the medieval times, raising our gas, property, cigarette and luxury taxes at your leisure. Here's an epiphany, Colorado made $2 million in marijuana tax revenue in January alone. With medical marijuana they are set to make $40 million in 2014. To me, that is stimulation of an economy. And you're not really changing anything.

Without this legalization, it would still be going on. Oh, by the way. you're saving millions of police manpower too (over $3 billion federally) which you could re-invest into heroin drug task forces, clinics for synthetic addictive drugs, or even do something like fix up our roads or build new bridges. Imagine that, you could really turn it into a positive. But no. You will instead drag your heels, beat your drums and do something totally shocking, like raise our gas tax again. Good job. Way to think out of the box.

Thomas Lemay


Last Updated on Thursday, 20 March 2014 10:47

Hits: 202

The Laconia Daily Sun - All Rights Reserved
Privacy Policy
Powered by BENN a division of the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette