To The Daily Sun,
In his April 15th letter, Mr. Osmer went to a lot of trouble to ferret out people who disagree with the theory behind the "Laffer curve." I applaud him for all his effort. However, I have a few points of rebuttal.
First, in the case of tax reductions under Presidents Kennedy, Reagan, and Bush, the results showed increases in tax revenues occurred when the tax rates were lowered. In Mr. Osmer's original post, he claimed that the Bush tax cuts cost us a loss of $1.8 trillion in tax revenues. However, following the citations provided by Mr. Osmer, I could not find anything to support the findings of the author of that claim.
Next, and perhaps most importantly, is the fact that under both President Bush and his successor, President Obama (who retained the majority of the Bush tax cuts), revenues have steadily increased. However, spending has far outpaced that revenue growth. If Mr. Osmer would go into Forbes and add up the net worth of the list of citizens who are billionaires, he would find that even if the government taxed/confiscated their entire fortunes, we wouldn't get enough money to run the country for a year.
I will say again, this is not a Democrat or Republican issue . . . it is about our country surviving. The old adage, 'If you're in a hole, the first thing you have to do is stop digging,' is what we should be paying attention to. If we keep spending 40 percent more than we take in, we will all lose.
Finally, President Obama is in his sixth year in office. At what point does he become responsible for his actions?
Last Updated on Tuesday, 15 April 2014 09:13
To The Daily Sun,
As with almost every school program, there has to be a steady and continuous growth if success is to be achieved. At Inter-Lakes High School, drama, in particular, has had rather a long history of emphasis to introduction, of slight interest to increased interest, and of traditional effects to more advanced technological changes. The work of such former directors as Norma Marshall, Roger Blake, Caesar Meledandri, Kathy Holly, Cindy Reid and Patrick Kelly has never gone unheralded nor unnoticed. Their mission was always precise and clear: To encourage students to become involved in drama, and once involved, to be active participants.
Students, aspiring to become actors and actresses, gradually responded, initially perhaps to the one-act plays that were being performed competitively among the various high school classes. Statewide Drama Festivals piqued more student interest and surely became ideal places at which students could showcase their stage expertise and be judged professionally. I believe that Inter-Lakes High School did participate in a few of those festivals.
As teachers saw the renewed impetus in play production, many of them got involved. The Art Department and the Graphics Department stepped up to help with stage set design, and publicity and printing respectively. Other faculty members assisted with costumes, makeup, props and character development. Progress was perhaps a bit slow at times, but it was sure and real. Famous shows that had stood the test of time were being considered by those directors, formerly alluded to in this letter. Those shows had huge casts, demanding lead roles, challenging music, but the directors were optimistic. They persevered with their auditions, and many of these grand shows were eventually produced by the I-LHS Drama Club: "Don Quixote," "Guys and Dolls," "Oklahoma," "South Pacific," "Oliver," "Music Man," "Fiddler on the Roof," "Arsenic and Old Lace," "Steel Magnolias," "Bye Bye Birdie," "Annie Get Your Gun," and "Pinnochio" to name a few. Kudos were readily exchanged ... stage successes were acclaimed.
All that, dear readers, was then. This is now — when the outstanding performances of the ever-popular show "Peter Pan" wowed the audiences which filled the I-L Community Auditorium to capacity. .. and the very capable directorship of Ms. Kathleen Hill was recognized. A lady who really needs little introduction, she has been active in theater, especially in the Middle Tier, for a long time here in the district. In that capacity she has introduced many young students to the challenges and the pleasures of a stage experience. Plays that she chose for them were always appropriate for their age level and their acting promise. Their successes, as well as hers, were never unheralded.
Perhaps as early as 2013, Ms. Hill was debating about choosing "Peter Pan" as the musical for 2014. She knew its cast was huge, its lead roles demanding, its music challenging, and its technical effects varied and costly. Did those factors discourage her? Certainly not. They had little immediate effect on her, for she invested in the show, its books and music, and all of its challenges. Somehow, Ms. Hill must have known that "Peter Pan" would be a winner for her I-LHS and I-LMT Theater Companies.
Certainly to all of us who saw the show this past week and weekend, it was a total winner in every respect. Ms. Hill's choice to blend the various age groups was a phenomenal decision — a first-time decision in the extent to which it was done. Those young actors and actresses from both the Elementary School and the Junior High were not only cute, clever and committed, they were also talented, tireless and theatrically "with it." Their facial expressions, body movements, and insatiable energy were absolutely extraordinary. Singing and dancing by all was totally audible and on key, and perfectly synchronized.
The show's main leads — Peter Pan (Mykenzi Sanders), Wendy (Emily Flanders), Father and Captain Hook (Gage Wheeler) — were expertly cast. All other actors and actresses assumed excellent supporting roles.
Extensive script that was truly perfected, character development and portrayal that were masterfully performed added so much to the grandeur and total effect of the entire show.
Costumes were both colorful and appealing. The Indians, the Pirates and the Lost Boys stood out very convincingly in both their costumes and in their character roles. Stage design and set pieces were highly functional and were utilized very well. Musical accompaniment by Mrs. Fand was great as always. Lighting and technical effects were impressive.
The art and act of flying must have had its first real test on our Audi stage, and Peter Pan's mastery, smoothness and security in doing it were brilliant.
All those students and adults behind the scenes are to be commended, too. Their attention to detail, their perfect timing, and their movement of stage pieces were done without noise or confusion.
For all the actors and actresses, past and present, their theatrical experiences had truly benefited them in so many excellent ways. They had developed more self-confidence and poise. They had mastered the ability to portray stage personae different from themselves. They had learned the tricks of time management, both on and off the stage. They had realized better control of their voices and their speech, and they had surely become good team players.
Theater in our I-L schools is certainly alive and well. Its original mission remains intact. Its role as an extracurricular activity has been confirmed. Its support by our three communities is guaranteed, and the range of its offerings is student-oriented and director-savvy.
I-L School Store Manager
Last Updated on Tuesday, 15 April 2014 09:07
To The Daily Sun,
In referring to letter published on April 11's Daily Sun by Mr. (Bob) Meade, I now wish I had learned to type and spell words with more than four letters. I will respond in two letters to the editor.
I will say I consider Mr. Meade to be well informed on all subjects. However, he can twist the facts on a subject to suit his way of thinking.
I wrote a letter April 8 stating Bush tax cuts reduced revenues $1.8 trillion over seven years. Mr. Meade wrote revenues increased $2.57 trillion under Bush. He claimed in his research of my letter, it was based on assumptions. He introduced me to the "Laffer curve." I will prove this is one of the biggest blunders Mr. Meade has ever made. While he stated that I was gloating ,in my first letter, this letter I will agree with him. I Googled "Laffer curve," read the pros, went to bottom of page and read, debunking Laffer — Laffer curve debunked. A good first point in thinking the title of this letter should be titled Mr. Meade Laffer curve discredited.
I next Googled "who is Art Laffer." He is a frequent guest on Fox News, former Reagan economic adviser. Please read "in praise of Art Laffer." Further research, I Googled "war deficit Iraq War Bush administration" and read critic's are still wrong on what's driving deficits in coming years. I also read "view updated data." February 28, 2013.
Since I realize not many will read the sites I mentioned, I will make two brief quotes. With the Iraq war treated as a "off the books" expense, the Pentagon was allowed to keep spending on high-end military equipment and cutting-edge technology in fiscal terms, it was as if the messy wars in Afghanistan and Iraq had never happened. With reduced taxes and military spending that meant we borrowed to pay for the war of choice that Bush led us into.
The CBO report dated Feb. 28, 2013, stated federal deficits and debt have been sharply higher under President Obama, but the evidence continues to show that the Great Recession, President Bush's tax cuts and two wars explain most of the deficit on Obama's watch. Further, the deficit under Bush will continue to affect federal budget until 2019. One must read this site to get full grasp of the damage to the federal budget that falls in Bush's lap.
I will let Mr.Meade know that these are not my assumptions,they are brief quotes from some of the most prestigious think tanks within federal government. To get full grasp of this site, you need to read the article.
During my surfing the web site I found this of which will be of interest to the right-wing party. Google "who is Laffer curve discredited." Read Glenn Beck's article that the plan is based on discredited Laffer curve, and watch the video. A quote in brief: "Laffer's theory is widely discredited," with Bush administration economist N. Gregory Manlow calling it not credible and numerous Bush administration officials acknowledge that tax cuts provide a net decrease in revenue. Scroll down and read "Heritage Foundation discredited."
In closing until next letter, I will admit I'm not the sharpest knife in the drawer. However, I can see BS a mile away.
Last Updated on Monday, 14 April 2014 08:46
To The Daily Sun,
During the public forum regarding Kimball Castle, which was held in Gilford on April 9, it became apparent that there are misconceptions as to whether or not the castle can truly be considered a castle and whether it can be considered historic.
According to Webster's Dictionary, the definition of a castle is a large building fortified against attack with thick walls, battlements, and towers, or a large, expensive home. Kimball Castle is, by definition, a castle.
The National Park Service, the federal organization that oversees the National Register of Historic Places, requires that a property must be at least 50 years old to be considered historic.
When a property is considered for the National Register, its age, integrity and historical significance are carefully examined. If a property is listed on the National Register, it does not prevent its demolition. Once razed, the property is removed from the register. However, its historical significance can never be erased.
Kimball Castle was placed on the National Register during the 1980s, which confirms that it is historic and its history is significant. The castle's National Register of Historic Places Inventory – Nomination Form may be viewed online by visiting the website of the National Park Service at: nps.gov.
Carol Lee Anderson
Last Updated on Monday, 14 April 2014 08:44
To The Daily Sun,
Last week's letters to the editor were remarkable but not necessarily very accurate.
For instance, Bernadette Loesch and I had a meeting or the minds. I have no idea of what she's talking about and neither does she, apparently. She claims Republicans have cut back and eliminated Democratic programs but gives no examples to explain this extraordinary assertion. Six years ago Obama railed against our then $9 trillion national debt, saying among other things that it was unpatriotic. Now that debt is $17.232 trillion, so I must say Republicans must have done a pretty bad job of cutting back and eliminating since the debt has been nearly doubled by Democrats in six years. Making up stories and issues, really Bernadette!
I really wish Republicans had been able to roll back and eliminate selected government programs. A couple that come to mind are the Department of Energy and of course Obamacare.
The first, created in the 1970s and charged with reducing the growing dependence on imported oil has been a complete failure. It has become a dumping ground for rewarding political activists with government jobs by both parties. If it fell into a black hole tomorrow I doubt anyone would even notice. As for Obamacare, aka the Affordable Care Act, that is not affordable by most Americans, has been changed by executive order 27 times and exempted most of the president's supporters who would not get it for free and incidentally was passed by lies, deceit, misrepresentations by Democrats behind closed doors at midnight.
Another letter I'd take issue with was from Nick Vazzana, who went off like a cannon on the Koch brothers because they are rich and support Republicans. No rich people should support anyone Nick doesn't support is the message I get from Nick. Never mind that the Koch brothers are honest hard-working successful Americans who have every right to free speech and association.
I doubt Nick has any second thoughts about George Soros setting up and supporting the left. Never mind that Soros is a convicted fellon and fugitive from justice. So what the heck he supports what Nick supports so everything is good there. No double standards for Nick, right?
Last Updated on Monday, 14 April 2014 08:41