Letter Submission

To submit a letter to the editor, please email us at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. Letters must contain the author's name, hometown (state as well, if not in New Hampshire) and phone number, but the number will not be published. We do not run anonymous letters. Local issues get priority, as do local writers. We encourage writers to keep letters to no more than 400 words, but will accept longer letters to be run on a space-available basis. Editors reserve the right to edit letters for spelling, grammar, punctuation, excessive length and unsuitable content.


Eighty-five Laconia teachers earned more than $60,000 in 2015

To The Editor,
Wednesday's article by Michael Kitch "Tax Cap Blamed for Low Teacher Salaries" states at the end that, "Councilors did not respond to these statements." Actually, the council did make remarks about this subject plus other matters in the budget at a public hearing prior to the 7 p.m. meeting. However, no press attended and only two members of the public were there. I am therefore stating a couple of things including the graphs I presented at the meeting.
"School Board member claims tax cap is responsible for problems with schools."
He further goes on to talk about how low pay to school teachers is responsible for good teachers leaving for better paying jobs.
School salaries are a matter of public record and are put forward each March. I have had a copy of theses salaries each year and not wanting to be personal about their incomes, find that constant attacks on the City Council for not allowing the schools to pay more is hitting below the belt. Here is just a small sample of some of those salaries:
85 teachers or support group members earned over $60,000 this past year, and this does not include their health benefits. Thirty-seven were in the 60-70,000 dollar range 27 were in the 70 to 80,000 dollar range; 13 were in the 80 to 90,000 dollar range, four were in the 90 to 100,000 dollar range and four were above 100,000.00. There were also 41 who received in the 50 to 60,000 range. Yes, there are new younger teachers earning below this. We all start at the bottom and prove ourselves over the years.
A copy of these salaries is available at the City Hall. If the paper would like to publish them, I will gladly furnish them a copy.
A picture speaks a thousand words. Below are two graphs taken from the City's annual audit by Melanson and they are also available to the public. The first graph shows the percentage of tax money the schools receive in contrast to the other city departments. The second graph shows the declining student trends over the past 10 years.

Finally, as recently noted in the paper there is a disparity of wealth that exists in Belknap County, Belknap County being the highest in the state. We also know that our city has one of the highest rates of an aging population. They are not producers.
The City Council has worked very hard to live within the means of the entire city and under the tax cap have done many things to improve the city and are working to update infrastructure and bring vitality back to our downtown, the Weirs, and Lakeport. It is hard, but it is a work of love.

Brenda Baer

Councilor Ward 4


  • Category: Letters
  • Hits: 438

Maybe it's time for the Gilmanton selectmen to take a deep breath

To The Daily Sun,

Seeing the front page article in Friday's Sun by Gail Ober, regarding Gilmanton and its selectmen, police department, town administrator, and more, was troublesome on so many levels.

The title of the article was misleading. There were several statement errors, and even Mr. McWhinnie was referred to as "Whinnie" at one point in the article.

Having said that, the article and its contents were upsetting. The town administrator, selectmen, Police Department or any town department should never be fodder for an article such as this. Our selectmen were elected to do a specific job for the town of Gilmanton but are still on a learning curve. During that time they have made some mistakes that they would probably like to take back. I'm afraid what transpired on Monday, if I can believe the newspaper, is yet another one of those missteps.

Never should the employment of any town employee be anything but a non-public item on the agenda of a selectmen's meeting. Talking about something or someone during an open session of an "emergency selectmen's meeting," that may do harm to them, their reputation, or their employment is, by law, unacceptable.

Maybe it's time for our selectmen to take a deep breath, review the laws that bind them in their positions, and get on with the work they were elected to do. Then, when or if an issue of employment comes up in another town department and the head of that department has solid information to bring to the selectmen, and only then, should it be discussed and that should always be in a non-public session.

Laws are made to follow and to help everyone from the governor all the way down to the janitors in our towns. If we believe we have the right or duty to make our own rules and defy what many have taken time to put forward for us to use as our guidelines to success, then what's the use of having representatives or senators, and so on?

I would urge our town to stop this nonsense, stop talking to the press, learn the laws that bind them, and then get on with the business of the people.

Elena Ball
Gilmanton Iron Works

  • Category: Letters
  • Hits: 775