Letter Submission

To submit a letter to the editor, please email us at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. Letters must contain the author's name, hometown (state as well, if not in New Hampshire) and phone number, but the number will not be published. We do not run anonymous letters. Local issues get priority, as do local writers. We encourage writers to keep letters to no more than 400 words, but will accept longer letters to be run on a space-available basis. Letters may be edited for spelling, grammar, punctuation and legal concerns.


Suicide attempt at jail was handled professionally; hereare the facts

To The Daily Sun,

A letter written by Mr. Gordon Blais was published in The Laconia Daily Sun on Thursday, Jan. 7. In his letter, Mr. Blais was very critical of the handling of a female inmate at the Belknap County Jail, who attempted suicide during her incarceration and who had to be hospitalized because of injuries that resulted from the unsuccessful attempt. This hospitalization has given rise to a substantial bill for which the county is responsible. Mr. Blais cites this incident as "another example of the poor leadership and bad management that afflicts our county government."

The incident referred to by Mr. Blais did in fact occur in the early fall of 2015. The occurrence itself is the only factually accurate content in Mr. Blais's letter; the remaining statements in the letter are incorrect.

First, Mr. Blais represents in his letter that his exchanges about the incident during the public comment portion of the meeting were with Commissioner Taylor. The exchanges he referred to in his letter were with me, as chairman and presiding officer at the meeting. I do not recall Commissioner Taylor actually participating in the discussion. Our meetings are videoed, thus making the fact of who said what easily verifiable.

Second, when processed into the county jail, the inmate was in the custody of the Department of Corrections, not the Sheriff's Department, as asserted by Mr. Blais.

Third, the claim by Mr. Blais that those in charge of the inmate knew or had reason to know that the inmate was a suicide risk is also incorrect.

Fourth, the statement by Mr. Blais that the inmate had previously attempted suicide while in jail is not correct. It should be noted that if the inmate had been viewed as a suicide risk, she would have been in a special cell and under constant observation.

Fifth, the inmate in question was in a regular cell occupied by inmates awaiting trial and classification, after which they are moved into general population. During this initial period these inmates have regular walk-by security checks every 30 minutes.

Sixth, when the attempted suicide was discovered, eight minutes had passed since the last walk by observation.

Seventh, Mr. Blais's suggestion that we don't utilize cameras in the jail is inaccurate. Cameras are a regular part of internal security in the jail. Cameras are focused on many of the cells from the day room area immediately outside the cells, including the one which the inmate in question was occupying. These cameras do have blind areas. The camera in the cell area in which the inmate in question was occupying observed some of her cell area, including much of the bunk area, but it did have blind areas within the cell. The inmate in question apparently knew the jail and the security routine well enough from previous stays to pick a time right after a walk by and to utilize an area out of camera sight for her suicide attempt.

This incident was thoroughly investigated immediately after it occurred. The results of his investigation were reported to the Board of Commissioners. At the Oct. 7, 2015, meeting Commissioner Burchell stated, "the recent incident at the jail was handled very professionally."

Commissioner Taylor stated that the report he had gotten indicated that "the handling of the incident had been outstanding." I concurred with my two colleagues. There was no negligence in the handling of the inmate prior to the suicide attempt and the incident was carefully and thoroughly investigated immediately after it took place.

In short, it has become clear that Mr. Blais looks for any opportunity he can find to hurl allegations of mismanagement against those who manage the county. It all started approximately four years ago, when his wife chose to resign her position with the county nursing home rather than face disciplinary action concerning allegations of improper conduct on her part. This latest assertion of mismanagement is simply another in a growing list of baseless claims of serious mismanagement by Mr. Blais, who clearly has his own personal ax to grind.

David DeVoy, Chairman

Belknap County Commission


  • Category: Letters
  • Hits: 652

A veteran is a veteran; change the law on tax credit eligibility

To The Daily Sun,

I would like to weigh in on the issue of veterans tax credits that has been addressed by George Horne and Charlie Flanagan of Meredith.

RSA72:28 was rewritten and became law about twelve years ago after many veterans circulated a petition throughout New Hampshire raising the tax credit limit to $500 on their personal residence or business. This had to be approved by the individual towns as it impacted their annual budgets. Those responsible for actually writing the RSA could not have been veterans or they would not have excluded their brothers/sisters in arms.

The RSA clearly follows guidelines set by Congress as the war or conflict beginning and ending dates.

Every man or woman who served this country got the same training and weapons as did those who served during the "war dates." They were as prepared as any others were for the inevitable protection of America against all enemies. A well armed and trained military is the best deterrent to armed aggression. Why should they be treated differently? They are referred to as "tweeners" because they served between declared conflict and cannot, in some cases, even join veterans service organizations. Wasn't their service to this country appreciated?

Our state legislators can correct this injustice by, once again, rewriting RSA 72:28 to include these veterans. While they are at it, they should change the 90-day requirement for eligibility because once you step foot into enemy territory, you are a target. Perhaps completing boot camp should be the standard, and of course being honorably discharged or general, under honorable conditions. A veteran is a veteran. Change the law.

Earlon Beale

  • Category: Letters
  • Hits: 363