Letter Submission

To submit a letter to the editor, please email us at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. Letters must contain the author's name, hometown (state as well, if not in New Hampshire) and phone number, but the number will not be published. We do not run anonymous letters. Local issues get priority, as do local writers. We encourage writers to keep letters to no more than 400 words, but will accept longer letters to be run on a space-available basis. Editors reserve the right to edit letters for spelling, grammar, punctuation, excessive length and unsuitable content.

 

For 75 years, the country has been going in the wrong direction

To The Daily Sun,

This election cycle has been like none other in history. The average citizen, taxpayer, and voter has been demonstrating, in no uncertain terms, that he/she is disgusted with the established way the political class has been taking the rest of us for granted, and they're simply not going to take it anymore. They want their country back, and the ideals that made it great by serving "We The People," the owners of the country.

They are disgusted with top government officials when they get caught trying to do things in a deceptive, illegal manner, using a "boot-leg" private email system, that would allow them to hide tens of thousands of their secret emails from the public they work for, and then lying about it.

They are disgusted with heads of governmental agencies who have been held in "contempt of Congress" for refusing to be held accountable for their behavior in office, and for refusing to turn over documents to legitimate congressional hearings.

They are disgusted when top government officials are caught red-handed delaying or actually disapproving applications for tax-exempt status for political opponents, and then be allowed to plead the Fifth Amendment and refuse to answer legitimate questions of congressional oversight committees.

They are disgusted with the president's cabinet members when they insist that our military couldn't have gotten there in time to do any good to save four Americans, including our ambassador to Libya, who were brutally killed in a terrorist attack. And then lying about why the attack even took place, blaming it on a stupid cartoon.

Top State Department subordinates plead the Fifth Amendment, and then are given immunity by the FBI before testifying before Congress. Or when a top diplomat at the State Department attempts to offer a bribe to an FBI agent to alter a "classified marking" on one of those damaging emails.

What we have here is a criminal "political ruling class" of deception and dishonesty in charge of running things in our nation's capitol. Who do they think they are? They pass laws that exempt themselves, but rigorously enforce them against all the rest of us. They think we work for them. Disgusting and outrageous!

More than 80 percent of all VA civilian employees are members of a public sector union, and presently they cannot be fired for any reason. As a four-year veteran of the U.S. Coast Guard during the Vietnam era, I am outraged.

Regarding the issue of who pays what taxes, more than 70 percent of the total money that's paid to the government every year, is paid by only 5 percent of the citizens. If you are talking to someone who tells you the top wage earners aren't paying their "fair share," please know that you are having a conversation with a thief.

If we are to achieve the standard of excellence that our country's founders envisioned three centuries ago, and that our grandparents and great-grandparents worked so hard to achieve for the future of their families, we must admit that for at least the last 75 years, the country has been moving in the wrong direction, due largely to the baby boomer generation, and their progressive worldview"that bigger government is better government.

Ronald Reagan said, "... the government can't fix the problem, because the government is the problem!" And Thomas Jefferson said, "... the government is a necessary evil..." And someone smart said, "Political power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely."

If I am honored to be elected to the state House from Belknap District 3 as a Republican (Laconia Ward 2) on Tuesday, Nov. 8, my efforts for you will include a concentration on the concept of putting "servant" back into the phrase "public servant." I will be a tireless "public servant" for you.

Jim McCoole
Candidate for N.H. House of Representatives
Laconia

  • Category: Letters
  • Hits: 343

Deregulation allowed insurers to turn patients into profit centers

To The Daily Sun,

Where does the responsibility of political inaction lie? Depending on your political leaning, it is either with the Obama administration or at the feet of those who have opposed him. Let's be clear, most of those who opposed President Obama don't write letters to the editor of The Laconia Sun. Although the local writing talent in the conservative pool make a consistent and concerted effort to plant seeds of doubt in our minds, they are not the most venal of the opposition to progressive ideas. The really big boys in the conservative movement lurk behind their lobbyists who are down in D.C. pushing agendas that have nothing to do with the welfare of the average American. As a result, we have some serious unaddressed problems.

Let's start with the health care issue as related to insurance. What you have is a group of companies that are "for profit" and a population with a need for care. Thus, you have a marketplace! Having worked in the life side of insurance, I can tell you there is quite a bit of profit to be had in insurance. Some insurance companies are more upright and honest than others. That's one of the reason for the states and federal government to get involved in the regulation of those who want to operate in our communities for a profit. In the not too distant past, some deregulation of those who offered insurance products was passed in Congress. What the deregulation achieved was not what was intended by the makers of the bill. What happened as a result was that the insurance companies, banking institutions and real estate companies came together "for profit" at the expense of both the taxpayers and the buyers of life and health insurance. Let me address the life insurance idea first.

Deregulation allowed two products to be offered. Banks were allowed to offer term insurance to their customers at attractive rates. That in some sense was a good thing. But the banks used it as nice little profit center that they could show to their re-insurer. The re-insurers would then use their sizable profit from the program to invest in real estate products called limited partnerships. Because of the deregulation of banks, they could offer the partnerships to investors who could afford to pony up $10,000 or $20,000 for a share in the profits over a set number of years. That is just one of the examples of how the insurance companies reached down into our pockets for profit.

Up until the deregulation, most people invested in whole life policies which accumulated cash value somewhat like a savings account. A nice concept for those who have trouble saving money. In case you died, the company paid the face value of the policy. You could actually borrow a portion of the cash value during the life of the policy.

Deregulation allowed the insurance companies to offer what was touted as a variable life product. The policies were usually written for greater amounts of death benefit, but were of little value if you wanted to have a product you could go to in hard times for a loan on its value. Agents went to all their insured people and offered the new product to replace the whole life policies and in the process pay the first year's premium on the new policy. If there was any cash value left over, it was returned to the policy holder. It was an inferior product that was slightly better than the banks new term products but cost more per thousand than the term from the banks.

Now, let's take a look at what deregulation did for the health care insurers.

Prior to the deregulation, states were able to control the product quality and to some extent the rate increases requested by the companies operating in their state. Blue Cross/Blue Shield had to go to each state to be licensed to operate. There were some other insurers in the field offering policies in the various states. The value received was usually good because the state and the companies were watching where the dollars provided out of company funds were going.

Deregulation allowed the HMO concept to arrive on the scene. The so-called Health Maintenance Organization was in theory controlled by the insured population. Well maybe, but as they say, the devil is in the details. Turn a bunch of insurance salesmen loose with a product and captive audience and you a have formula for corruption. It got sold to companies as a cheaper product, to the doctors as guaranteed income and to the general user population as a way to maintain their wellness. What's not to like?

One of the features that seemed to irritate the users was that there seemed to be a lot of procedures that required pre-approval. Another problem for the customer was that the doctors were encourage by the HMO to limit the referrals to experts in the field because it would affect their income stream. As companies started to feel the effects of the employee discontent, some of that abated, but it left a bad taste in the mouth of the user.

Enter President Obama and the concept of universal health care. The perceived need for it was felt most strongly by those who had to contend with the uninsured. Approximately 20 percent of the U.S. population had no health insurance. I will address the pros and cons of the universal health care concept and how it evolved into the Affordable Care Act in my next letter. I will deliver it to you as a Christmas present because I will be too busy watching the election in the next few days.

Bill Dawson

Northfield

  • Category: Letters
  • Hits: 354