A+ A A-

12 times Sanbornton voters have rejected SB-2 – let’s make it 13

To the editor,
Although Sanbornton voters have chosen not to adopt SB2 12 times, we are being asked to vote on it again this year.  It seems they don't respect the fact that the majority have made it clear 12 times that they want to retain our Town Meetings. 
A letter written last week found fault with the suggestion that there might be problems under SB-2, such as the lone voter in the voting booth, faced with a long list of warrant articles, might become confused or frustrated and just vote no all down the line just to get it over with. Not only is it possible but can also occur when the voter has to read the long list of warrant articles. That 15 or 20 minutes or more in the booth isn't the only problem there either. Taking far longer than our current quick in and out of the booth, there may even be waits to get into the booths while other are working their way done the warrant one issue at a time.
In his letter he also stated that if someone couldn't or didn't attend Town Meeting meant they forfeited their rights.  No, their choice or ability to participate was not exercised but their right to participate was never taken from them.
He then goes on to compare Town Meeting to Nazi Germany and North Korea.  I find that insulting, and shameful and I think the writer owes the people of our community an apology!  He then goes on to talk about "freedom of choice", as he apparently thinks Town Meeting in some way takes that away.  That's not so. Many who do not attend Town Meeting are exercising their "freedom of choice"!
Here are some other problems with SB-2.  In each of the 20 years since it has been in existance there has been a great deal of legislation filed to make changes in SB-2 in one way or another because of it's many flaws. Like solving the problem of the warrant article that  was amended at a Deliberative Session and, as amended, ended on the ballot as just "To see".  I wonder if the ballot vote on "To see" was yes or no.
Those who feel that the 150 or more who attend Town Meeting is too small a group to decide the business of the town are ignoring the fact that a much smaller group, about 50, will make the real decisions under SB-2.  The ballot vote will only say yes or no to what the 50 may or may not have amended.  You can't amend in the voting booth.  You can vote yes or no on articles such as "To see", or articles that may have been amended so they have money amounts that aren't great enough to purchase the intended item.
Please vote "NO" to SB-2.  Don't become complacent because we have won 12 times!  We need you all to vote "NO SB-2" so we can send the message again. 
Evelyn Auger

Last Updated on Tuesday, 07 May 2013 09:31

Hits: 439

Fields lost clerk’s post because of repeated lack of professionalism

To the editor,
In last Thursdays paper there was an article that stated, "State Representative Dennis Fields (R-Sanbornton), ... was recently voted out of his position as Belknap County Delegation clerk". But I'm not sure that this is a balanced assessment of what took place. In actuality Rep. Fields would still be clerk if a re-vote out of an abundance of caution had not been taken and to dispel any appearance of impropriety. I believe that in the re-vote there was demonstrated a loss of confidence in Rep. Fields as a result of his repeated lack professionalism. I have to agree with Don Walker who wrote in Friday's edition, "For me, the most egregious (charge from Rep. Fields) was the threat that he had to "toe the line" or be removed from his clerk post. He was not removed from his post, he simply lost the opportunity to continue as clerk through the circumstances that surfaced by the lawsuit and by losing the respect of his peers.
Rep. Stephen Holmes
District 5

Last Updated on Tuesday, 07 May 2013 09:21

Hits: 383

Lead sinkers are cheap for fishermen but very costly for loons

To the editor,
I am writing to urge broad support for SB-89 to be voted on shortly by the N.H. House. The bill would prohibit the use of certain smaller toxic lead jigs and sinkers in fishing tackle. It would protect loons by restricting the use lead fishing sinkers weighing one ounce or less. This fishing tackle is by far the largest source of documented adult loon mortality and has had a significant negative impact upon our state's small loon population.
This legislation sponsored in the State Senate by Senator Jeanie Forrester will have minimal effect upon fishermen, but a huge effect upon loons and other wildlife that feeds upon the bottom of NH fresh water lakes. The use of a non-lead sinker or jig that is not poisonous will have no effect upon catching fish.
Please keep in mind that loons do not reproduce until their sixth year of life or later, and loon pairs have an average of only one surviving chick every two years. Thus, survival of adult loons is the most important factor in assuring the continued viability of our state's loon population. Unfortunately, New Hampshire lost 124 adult loons to ingested lead sinkers and jigs between 1989 and 2011. These deaths have had a significant negative impact on our state's small loon population.
Sinkers and jigs are inexpensive for anglers. If they are lead, they are very expensive for loons. Substitute non-lead sinkers and jigs are of nominal expense to fishermen and the proposed restriction on the use of small lead sinkers under one ounce should have no adverse affect upon sportsmen and women who enjoy fishing. I urge passage of this common sense legislation.
Eric Taussig, Treasurer
Loon Preservation Committee

Last Updated on Tuesday, 07 May 2013 09:12

Hits: 422

County residents are victims in Worsman’s war against commission

To the editor,
The quagmire that Belknap County Convention Chair Colette Worsman has created for this county is unnecessary and counterproductive.
As chairs of the Belknap County and Lakes Region Democrats, we are calling for a cease fire in the ongoing battle between the majority of the delegation's Republican members and the county commissioners. Rather than spend taxpayer money on legal representation, Rep. Worsman should reconsider her position on the line item spending issue, cancel the "non-meeting" in Concord on May 8th, and come back to the table with consensus and civility as the goals.
By calling a "non-meeting" followed by a public meeting, Rep. Worsman is walking a very narrow line. Calling for the county delegation to meet in Concord is highly unusual and effectively cuts Belknap County residents out of the conversation. Moreover, by summarily dismissing the information provided by Belknap County administration regarding the supplemental nursing home appropriation, while simultaneously demanding even more information, Rep. Worsman is potentially denying the public access to rehabilitation services (which could generate up to $200 million in additional revenue for the county) as well as overstepping her role as chair. Perhaps if Rep. Worsman had allowed the subcommittees more time to learn about the operation of the Nursing Home, rather than ramming through her slash-and-burn county budget that only is only balanced on the backs of our county employees, we wouldn't be in this mess. Regardless, whether or not the information provided by the administration is adequate is a question to be put to the entire delegation as well as the public at large. Instead of finding ways to get around New Hampshire's public meeting laws, Rep. Worsman should conduct the delegation's fact finding in public and on the record.
This latest skirmish is simply another in the stand off between Rep. Worsman and the county commissioners which began as soon as she took office. She lobbied aggressively for the chairperson slot and, upon her election, set off immediately on what appears to be a witch hunt. Belknap County has seen its share of misdeeds and reprehensible behavior at the county level, but those days are long gone. The current commissioners have earned the respect of, and have been re-elected by, the communities they serve because of their careful stewardship not only of tax dollars but also of the institutions in their care, among them the county courthouse, the Department of Corrections and the county nursing home. It is now Rep. Worsman's behavior that is reprehensible.
This vitriol must stop. This is a vendetta; it is not leadership. The ground on which Rep. Worsman is attempting to stand is shaky. Will she and the majority of like-minded Republicans in the county delegation please take a step back, listen with an open mind to the testimony and suggestions of the commissioners, the staff and the other public and move forward on behalf of all Belknap County residents?
Matt Huot
Laconia/Belknap County Democrats
Denise Doyle & Kate Miller
Meredith/Lakes Region Democrats

Last Updated on Tuesday, 07 May 2013 09:07

Hits: 321

The proof is in the pudding when it comes to gun control bills

To the editor,
In some of the 'Letters to the Editor' written recently in The Daily Sun, writers seem to be suffering from the following:
1. Hyperbole — obvious and intentional exaggeration,
2. Overstatements,
3. Going well beyond the pale to excess,
4. Blatant ignorance,
Just to name a few. The misleading and purposeful outright lies are truly amazing (and not in a good way). How very sad that those individuals have nothing better to do than twist and turn, contort, and distort the truth of the gun control bills recently proposed in the Senate.
Manchin (D) and Toomey (R) are among the mature, clear thinking individuals in the Senate. We should be thanking them for coming together for the common good.
As the ole saying goes, "the proof is in the pudding". Those who supported those gun control bills have gained favor and those who voted against have lost many points of popularity in the polls. Case in point Senator Kelley Ayotte. Her poll numbers have dropped like a rock.
Bernadette Loesch

Last Updated on Tuesday, 07 May 2013 08:59

Hits: 288

The Laconia Daily Sun - All Rights Reserved
Privacy Policy
Powered by BENN a division of the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Login or Register