Letter Submission

To submit a letter to the editor, please email us at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. Letters must contain the author's name, hometown (state as well, if not in New Hampshire) and phone number, but the number will not be published. We do not run anonymous letters. Local issues get priority, as do local writers. We encourage writers to keep letters to no more than 400 words, but will accept longer letters to be run on a space-available basis. Editors reserve the right to edit letters for spelling, grammar, punctuation, excessive length and unsuitable content.

 

Legislature can handle state's business without meeting every year

To The Daily Sun,

New Hampshire's state Legislature is unique in many ways, one of the most prominent being its size — 400 members of the House and 24 members of the Senate. That makes it the third largest legislative body in the world, with only the U.K.'s Parliament and the U.S. Congress being larger.

One of the other things that used to make New Hampshire different from many other states was that its Legislature only met every other year. That meant the legislators had to take care of business because they knew they had limited time to get everything done before the legislative session ended.

That all changed in 1984 when a group of citizens and legislators made a pitch to switch to annual legislative sessions. Their reasoning behind the change was that the five- to six-month biennial session was too long and that shorter annual sessions would be less of a burden.

They sold us a pig in a poke.

Those five- to six-month-long biennial sessions have turned into five- to six-month-long annual sessions. The promise of shorter annual sessions never materialized. The cost of annual sessions was more than twice that of the biennial session. In that time a lot of useless legislation has been filed and wasteful spending has been passed. There were no savings in either time or money. Annual sessions are far more of a burden on both legislators and taxpayers than biennial sessions.

We were conned and I think it's time to do something about it.

It's well past time to amend the state Constitution, specifically Part II, Article 3 — When to Meet and Dissolve — and go back to biennial sessions. Annual sessions have failed to live up to the promises made by its proponents and it's time to admit that we made a mistake. It's time to take a step back.

I already know the argument will be made that we can't go back now, that we can't possible handle the state's needs meeting only every other year. But I can counter that by looking at the biggest state in the continental U.S. — Texas — which has a single 90-day legislative session every two years and it seems to be able to handle all of its business in that time. New Hampshire is a fraction of the size of Texas (9,349 square miles versus 268,596 square miles) with a fraction of the population (1.33 million versus 27.97 million), but we won't be able to handle the state's business in five to six months every two years? I'm not buying it. That implies that either the people in Texas are a heck of a lot smarter and work harder, or we've gone stupid and are incapable of doing what we once could do. I'm not buying that either.

The experiment of annual legislative sessions has failed. It's costing us money and not living up to its promise. It's time to declare the experiment over and get back to something we know works and works well.

Dale Channing Eddy

Gilford

  • Category: Letters
  • Hits: 302

Trump has belittled Captain Khan's sacrifice & attacked his parents

To The Daily Sun,

I am a disabled veteran and served my country for 21 years in the United States Marine Corps. At the start of my career I swore an oath of office to support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic.
Captain Humayun Khan swore that same oath and made the ultimate sacrifice. Donald Trump has belittled Khan's sacrifice and attacked his parents.

The presidents of the United States also swear an oath to "the best of their ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States." I don't believe Trump is capable of honestly executing that oath. His vitriolic attacks on Americans based on religion, race, gender, and now military service, prove that he lacks the ability, moral fitness and integrity to serve as president and commander in chief.

I hope you will consider these points and vote for Hillary Clinton this November. Thank you.

John A. Scarborough, Lt. Col., USMC (Ret)

Plymouth

  • Category: Letters
  • Hits: 352