Letter Submission

To submit a letter to the editor, please email us at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. Letters must contain the author's name, hometown (state as well, if not in New Hampshire) and phone number, but the number will not be published. We do not run anonymous letters. Local issues get priority, as do local writers. We encourage writers to keep letters to no more than 400 words, but will accept longer letters to be run on a space-available basis. Letters may be edited for spelling, grammar, punctuation and legal concerns.

 

We should, can & must accept 100,000 refugees from Syria

EDITOR'S NOTE: This letter is being rerun to correct an error in the headline and a typographical error in the text when it originally appeared on Oct. 2.

To The Daily Sun,

To date the U.S has agreed to accept 10,000 refugees escaping war and ISIS brutality. This is far too few considering that our decision to not intervene in the Syrian conflict has, to a considerable degree led to the current humanitarian crisis.

Therefore I believe we have an obligation, if not a moral imperative to act now.

We are a nation of 320 million. We can easily accommodate 100,000 refugees. If you think that number is too large, let me put in perspective. Imagine a sports stadium filled with 32,000 people. Our accepting 100,000 refugees would be the equivalent of making room for 10 more in the stadium.

We should, we can and we must do this.

Jack Landow

Gilford

  • Category: Letters
  • Hits: 642

Our solicalizing time at the Sanbornton dump has disappeared

To The Daily Sun,

Sanbornton is a quaint, small community of rural people. It always has been and if the populace continues as it is, it always will be. However, things are changing in our little town.

The planners are afraid of being sued by contractors who want us to have more workforce housing. But we have sufficient housing, so they won't be suing us anytime soon. Why bring in federal government grants to pay for things we don't need? Nothing the government does is free. We will have to pay back in loss of freedoms eventually, as the federal government wants more and more power. Look at it. When we moved here almost 40 years ago, certain permits were needed for various enterprises, of course. We can't have unplanned growth, or uncontrolled sprawl. But the rules are getting tighter and tighter.

Even the state government is getting involved in our little town. Water rights are being squeezed. Under a little-known program instituted by the Department of Housing and Urban Development called Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH), communities and even an entire state have formally ceded a major portion of their economic development and planning rights to the federal government. Our state has a regional water authority, instituted by Gov. John Lynch in 2011.

The program names are different, but the situation is the same in every state: Un-elected regional councils are usurping local control over property rights, and educational rights too. Learn about the takeover of all water in the U.S., or the WOTUS:
http://www.cfact.org/2015/08/20/wotus-who-do-you-trust-with-your-water-after-epas-toxic-spill/

Twenty-nine states have filed lawsuits against the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency for redefining the "Waters of the United State"," or WOTUS, erasing "navigable" and usurping states' rights by including local seasonal streams, farm irrigation ponds, roadside ditches, and even "connective" dry lands placed under authority of the Clean Water Act:
http://www.cfact.org/2015/07/22/environmental-protection-agency-flooded-with-lawsuits-over-controversial-water-rule/ For more information regarding the above, check out GraniteStateFutures.com.

And now, it is our recycling center. What's happening to Sanbornton? Saturdays are social days at the recycling center (dump). People bring in objects that are good, and take other things, and there's a great exchange all around, including clothes, books, children's toys, and kitchen and household items. And we see residents we haven't seen in a while. Now in one fell swoop, the insurance company comes in and wipes it all away. Someone may sue the town for (what?). So all of our social draw has suddenly disappeared. I was told if it were reinstated, it wouldn't be done until next March. What? One day to destroy it all, and six months to revive it? Rachel Paige is working on a petition to the selectboard for townspeople to sign. Sanbornton residents, sign it. It's part of who we are.

Peggy Graham
Sanbornton

  • Category: Letters
  • Hits: 559