Letter Submission

To submit a letter to the editor, please email us at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. Letters must contain the author's name, hometown (state as well, if not in New Hampshire) and phone number, but the number will not be published. We do not run anonymous letters. Local issues get priority, as do local writers. We encourage writers to keep letters to no more than 400 words, but will accept longer letters to be run on a space-available basis. Editors reserve the right to edit letters for spelling, grammar, punctuation, excessive length and unsuitable content.


Region was defined as Palestine long before creation of Israel

To The Daily Sun,

Steve Earle ("What claim do Muslim Arabs have for claiming Palestine?") dismisses the U.N. as a "pack of jackals" in response to a recent Security Council resolution condemning Israel's settlements. He doesn't seem to understand that the U.N. is made up of independent states including our closes allies, such as Britain. In fact, Britain, along with Japan and France, as members of the U.N. Security Council, voted for the resolution that offended Mr. Earle.

As for Mr. Earle's attempt to erase Palestine, his opinion is trumped by voluminous historical records. The region was defined as Palestine long before the creation of Israel. In 1905 The World Zionist Organization proclaimed its intention to "direct all future settlement efforts solely to Palestine." The all-important 1917 Balfour Declaration referred to "Palestine" and the "existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine.. In 1922 the League of Nations granted Britain the "Palestine Mandate," which referred to the "inhabitants of Palestine, irrespective of race and religion."
I am very thankful that The Laconia Daily Sun prints enlightening letters from well-informed people like Janet Simmon.

Patricia Saenger

  • Category: Letters
  • Hits: 397

3 Bristol selectmen voted to give town employees a 15% raise

To The Daily Sun,

Can someone tell me just how this works?

After reviewing the official minutes from Bristol's 2016 Town Meeting two things became clear:

First, Article 12: "To see if the town will vote to raise and appropriate the sum of fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000) to fund the cost of a comprehensive wage and classification study for town positions."

This Article was soundly defeated by a ballot vote of; YES: 6 No: 137.

There was no further amendment and no action to authorize a comprehensive wage and classification study.

Next, Deputy Fire Chief Chris Dolloff presented an amendment to increase the budget bottom line by $75,203. to fund pay increases. This was defeated on a voice vote.

To sum up, there was no enabling legislation and no appropriation for pay raises approved by the town voters.

In spite of this the Selectboard, in August proceeded to conduct its own "Pay Study" and grant a 15 percent pay increase to town employees.

This is not to disparage any of our town employees — most are dedicated professional people — but who is looking out for the taxpayer and property owner?

When asked, one selectman stated that he and one of the new selectman were never provided with a copy of the so-called "pay study" prior to the 3-to-2 vote. To be fair, Selectman Manganiello and Morrison voted against these raises. Selectmen Alpers, Lagueux and Dion voted for it.

This extralegal pay raise and payroll overhead cost the Bristol taxpayers approximately $90,000 this year and $364,032 in the 2017 budget year.

Thank you Selectpersons Alpers, Lagueux and Dion.

Hold on taxpayers there's more; wait until you see the price tag on the new regional police station.

Paul Simard


  • Category: Letters
  • Hits: 674