Letter Submission

To submit a letter to the editor, please email us at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. Letters must contain the author's name, hometown (state as well, if not in New Hampshire) and phone number, but the number will not be published. We do not run anonymous letters. Local issues get priority, as do local writers. We encourage writers to keep letters to no more than 400 words, but will accept longer letters to be run on a space-available basis. Letters may be edited for spelling, grammar, punctuation and legal concerns.


Internal combustion engine can be replaced by self-charging motors

To The Daily Sun,

I doubt any here are familiar with me, but I was involved with electronic and electrical power for much of the earlier part of my life — repair, control and testing. In the letter's section of the March 21 paper, Steve Earle made comments about about energy supply and technology — something I've complained about for years, which urges me to make some clarification. The cost issue has some merit but, relative to it, there is a greater issue.

Even with my "ancient" technology, we can eliminate the hybrid vehicle. That infernal, oops, I mean internal, combustion engine can be replaced with a second battery pack along with a charging system. There is a charging system in standard vehicles. It's called an alternator (within it is a rectifier circuit, that changes its AC to DC, and a regulator circuit, which maintains the determined voltage output). With a little more control circuitry, you'll now have a vehicle that can travel indefinitely. As Steve indicated, there is still maintenance, wear and possible breakdowns to contend with, but this is a simple application of "old" technology.

What is the drawback? If our vehicles are self-charging, what happens to all those convenience stores and service stations relying on refueling (now by electric chargers). Those air pumps that the quarters are plunked into will get more use. Can you see those places, with all their employees, replaced with "Going Out of Business" signs?

The oil industry put us over the barrel long ago. Now we'll have to slip and slide our way out of it.

H. Hudson

  • Category: Letters
  • Hits: 242

Drastic state budget cuts will affect our most vulnerable citizens

To The Daily Sun,

An effective democracy demands action from ordinary citizens. We have the power to facilitate change, especially at the local and state level, if we care enough to make our voices heard.

Once again, our New Hampshire state Legislature is proposing more drastic, deep cuts to the Health and Human Services budget for some of New Hampshire's most vulnerable children, youth, and families. The current proposed budget cuts will be in addition to all of the devastating cuts that the legislature already implemented in 2011 for health and human services. The current proposed budget cuts for 2015 include:

1. Funding for emergency shelters: Proposal to cut half ($4 million) out of the current $8 million annual budget to provide shelter to the over 4,000 New Hampshire families that become temporarily homeless each year. We already have a crisis with a lack of space in New Hampshire homeless shelters — this proposed budget cut would double our current problem.

2. Proposal to cut $52 million from developmental disability services from the current budget of $293 million.

3. Allow Medicaid expansion to sunset as of Dec, 31, 2016, for New Hampshire residents, leaving approximately 39,000 New Hampshire citizens living in poverty without affordable health-care coverage. Since the federal government covers almost the entire cost of Medicaid expansion with our federal tax dollars, the state Legislature voting to end Medicaid expansion for New Hampshire means denying us a benefit that we will still continue to pay for.

4. Eliminate Medicaid optional services. This budget cut will eliminate many health benefits for people living in poverty, including psychiatric services for youths on Medicaid under 21 years of age.

5. Cut $6 million from the current $9.5 million New Hampshire budget for drug and alcohol treatment and prevention. This proposed cut comes at a time when Laconia struggles with a severe heroin problem.

If you want to help stop these harmful budget cuts, please contact your representatives in the state Legislature before it is too late.

As we enter another road construction season, I always feel saddened by how much money we as a state and nation spend to fix many roads that seemed to be perfectly fine even before we spend millions of dollars annually to repair them. While fixing crumbling bridges is essential for public safety, so many New Hampshire road construction projects have nothing to do with fixing bridges. Although road construction projects use public money to create more jobs, increasing public health and human services programs would also create more jobs. We should reallocate some of the money from non-essential road repairs to fund the above-mentioned public health and human services fully. Is it more important to smooth a drivable road or to save a human life?

Although the United States has only 5 percent of the world's population, we warehouse 25 percent of all people behind jail and prison bars in the world. The United States now has the highest incarceration rate and the highest percentage of its population behind bars of any nation in the world. The more we cut prevention, intervention, and support services for children, youth, and families today, the more people will likely end up in prison later. We need to increase essential funding for health and human services, not decrease it!

Marian Wright Edelman, president and founder of the Children's Defense Fund, writes, "Investing in children is not a national luxury or a national choice. It's a national necessity.... The issue is not are we going to pay -- it's are we going to pay now, up front, or are we going to pay a whole lot more later on."

Dave Lynch


  • Category: Letters
  • Hits: 280