It will be fun watching Sen. Ayotte put Gov. Hassan out to pasture

To The Daily Sun,

As Ronald Regan would say, there she goes again. My favorite Democrat from Meredith, Paula Trombi, is trashing Senator Ayotte again.

She states we shouldn't be fooled by Senator Ayotte's recent tactics. There is nothing to be fooled about, She has been against funding Planned Parenthood as long as I can remember.

There are many good reasons for that. No. 1: it cost the taxpayers $538 million a year to fund Planned Parenthood; No. 2: they made $127 million in profit last year; No. 3: they give millions of dollars to Democrat candidates throughout the country, I wonder how much of that is taxpayer money; and No. 4 is the best part: they pay the director $500,000 a year in salary.

As a taxpayer I thank the senator for trying to save us from wasting so much money.

I would also like to thank the Executive Council of New Hampshire for defunding Planned Parenthood.

As far as Sen. Ayotte shutting down the government, two days ago she voted with the majority to keep the government running.
Paula wants the people of New Hampshire to remember her record, and they will by electing her again for another six years.

It is my personal wish that the Democrats will run Governor Hassan against her. It will be fun putting the governor out to pasture. She and Hillary can have fun intheir retirement.

Thanks Senator Ayotte.

L. Michael Hatch


  • Category: Letters
  • Hits: 81

State income tax necessary if we are going to meet budget needs

To The Daily Sun,

Once again the state Legislature has put needs of their concept of reality before the needs of the citizens of the state. The governor, reluctantly, has signed on to a hacked-together budget compromise. Everyone agrees that taxes are just about the worst way to collect money. It ranks right up there with begging. Unfortunately both are used by those who need for whatever reason need some help to get by on the margin of poverty, to be educated, to supplement inadequate care for their children and an allowance to medical needs.

If I may, let me point out some ways their budget fell short. The obvious problem is they didn't adequately plan for the payment for the needs they are trying to ignore in hopes they will go away. Can anyone defend cutting taxes in the face of so many glaring needs. Here are some of the ways they made changes to fees, not taxes. New Medicaid enrollees can be ignored for a couple of years because it is 100 percent funded by the federal government. User fees are popping up all over the place.

One that really galls me, an old-timer, is the announcement that fishing license for those over 68 will now cost $10. It has been free for about 20 years. The Fish and Game Department has been using volunteers for all sorts of things that would be left undone because of lack of staff. Now, after volunteering for some task, I can't go down to the riverbank without paying the state $10 a year after I have registered boat and trailer for about three times that amount. I am not overly fond of fees. You can't even park without paying a fee at some of the states recreational facilities.

Someone has to do a needs analysis for the state government. What are the fixed costs of running the various departments. A few years ago there was a court case that was trying to answer the question: What is an adequate education and what does it cost. I don't think we ever solved that little conundrum. They weren't even addressing the college cost and how to address them.

What about the roads and highways in the state? How many bridges are being ignored? How many roads formerly maintained by the state are now the responsibility of the towns? Can the towns afford that cost? The state's dirty little secret — cost-shifting to the counties and the towns — is revealed as we at the local level struggle to make sure we tax our real estate to cover the needs.

We also run food banks in church basements to provide an adequate diet for those that state is failing in provide for in so many ways. To sum this up for all those legislators who still have a conscience, there is a solution based on the age-old concept of fair taxation. User fees have their place but fair taxation is the solution. Taxes should not fall on those already in need. Business profits can be taxed but that is not the most fair tax. At some point we have to face the fact that large individual incomes should be taxed at a rate equal to that paid out by the vast majority in federal taxation. Yes, the dirty word in New Hampshire, income taxation is long overdue if we are going to address budget needs. Local real estate can't stand another jolt. So let's get real during the next budget go-round. Some of you may take some heat but who knows, some of us will be cheering as we go to our well deserved lunch at the senior center.

Bill Dawson


  • Category: Letters
  • Hits: 113

Funding for World Trade Center health program has expired

To The Daily Sun,
The headline read: "Congress Fails to Reauthorize Funding for 9/11 First Responders and Survivors". "Funding for the World Trade Center Health Program expired at midnight on Wednesday."

This now leaves tens of thousands of its beneficiaries wondering how they will continue to get their much needed medical treatment.

This program was created in 2010 and provides medical treatment for survivors and first responders who worked at the site after the Twin Towers were attacked and collapsed. There are more than 72,000 enrolled in this fund and affected people are dying each week because of their exposure to the toxic chemicals created by the 9/11 attacks.

Congress has failed to approve an extension of this crucial act. Without it thousands of people who are still suffering from the after affects of exposure to asbestos, lead and glass fibers, just to name a few of the deadly chemicals, are in danger of losing medical access and reimbursement for treatment.

The program has enough funding for another year, but CDC director Tom Frieden has said that in 2016 it will face "significant operational challenges" without an extension.

Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y., reminded her fellow senators that "more police officers have died in the aftermath of 9/11 than did in the attacks themselves."

What's important to note is why this particular bill has expired now. It's all due to retired Senator Tom Coburn (who is receiving his generous congressional pension for life). He insisted that funding coverage expire in 2015, even though many of his GOP colleagues not only urged its passage, but wanted the coverage to extend for many more years. This is Tom Coburn's legacy. I hope he's proud of it.

Bernadette Loesch


  • Category: Letters
  • Hits: 110

Why would the Catholic Church endorse the theory of evolution?

To The Daily Sun,
James Veverka I think, thinks himself to be a paragon of knowledge and wisdom. Yet in my experience with him, he never digs deeply enough into a subject that he writes about to actually understand the matter for which he purports to have this great knowledge.

He writes about intelligent design and the theory of evolution. His letter is actually a response to my previous letter, but he won't write it as such because in so doing he would need to respond to some valid observations concerning the theory of evolution that I brought to the readers' attention. He would rather pretend that the things that I wrote about do not exist. That saves him from having to respond to them. He then just launches out with his boilerplate definitions and explanations, and there is no dialog.

I will digress here for Jim starts out telling us about Alabama's new science and education standards. Just what does that have to do with the matter. I acknowledge that if not the whole world, most of it is moving in the "progressive" direction as I write. Yet, I think this quote is apt here, "During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act." If the whole world believes that man has descended from an amoeba and someone says no, God created each according to its kind that would seem revolutionary, even though it is true. Citing Alabama's science standards here is kind of like the kid whose parents won't let him go to a particular party, and he says, aw, but all the other kids parents are letting them go. It has nothing to do with an intellectual argument. It is strictly about peer pressure: well if they're doing it, it must be right. But its not, and the party gets busted and two kids die of an over dose of heroin at it. So it is with Jim's pointing to Alabama's change in standards. By the way all the changes do not have to do with evolution or climate change.

As most who read my letters know, I'm a creationist. But the discussion here turns to intelligent design which is a different view from mine, but how it is treated by the scientific community is instructive. The persecution of those who have been bold enough to consider this concept openly, in the scientific community, I have eluded to in my two previous letters. Here Jim is at best ignorant or at worst not forthcoming. He would do well to try to understand a concept before he writes about it, instead, he says that, "Intelligent design assumes as certain fact that there is a God and then tries to build a case within that box." Rather it is the "study of patterns in nature that are best explained as and result of intelligence" and it "is a minimal commitment scientifically to the possibility of detecting intelligent causation." as apposed to, assuming that we are here through "the common decent of all life on earth from a single ancestor via undirected mutation and natural selection."

Jim says, that the idea of irreducible complexity always crumbles when examined. I'd like to see him defend that assertion.

Jim says that science is neutral on the creator. I would like him to show how this is possible when the theory of evolution creates a historical narrative in which one is forbidden to consider the creator's creative power and design. How is that being neural on the creator? Evolutionists will only ever give you double talk on that. Or some will recommend what type of faith is compatible with the theory of evolution. Does that sound to be neutral on the creator? We accept Him as we find Him. Not as someone would wish him to be.

This brings to mind a point Jim makes in his letter. Some Christians hold to the theory of evolution as actual. This letter is already longer than I would like, so I'm going to pick an easy target for an example here, the Catholic Church. No offense to my Catholic brothers and sisters. While nuns and priests at the local level fight valiantly against government usurpation of religious freedom, the Catholic Church endorses the theory of evolution, which is the foundation for the doctrines that their ministers are struggling against. These and all like them are those whom I would like to reach. For to agree with evolutionists in their grand theory is to make common cause with those who would destroy the church.

John Demakowski

  • Category: Letters
  • Hits: 94

President has shown sympathy for Muslim world by his actions

To The Daily Sun,

"The Grizzly bear is huge and wild, he has devoured the infant child. Infant child is not aware, he has been eaten by the bear." — A.E. Houseman's poem springs to mind as we look at Putin, the Russian bear and his newly formed Middle Eastern alliance.

"Fuzzy Wuzzy was a bear. Fuzzy Wuzzy had no hair. Fuzzy Wuzzy wasn't fuzzy, was he? Was he bare?" This kiddie poem springs to mind as we look at President Obama's feckless and frightfully "hairless" foreign policy. Remember Obama's multi-nation coalition to fight ISIS? The one that has been as feckless as his foreign policy. A policy that has been laid bare for all the world to see?

Recent reports appear to confirm that Putin has formed an ISIS intelligence sharing pact with Iran, Syria and Iraq and has seemingly done so without America's involvement or consent. How's that for irony? Iran, the country that Obama is supposed to be a diplomatic partner with by lifting sanctions and giving the Mullahs a $100 billion with which to sponsor terror around the world. Syria, the country that Obama used disappearing ink on when he dared it's leadership to cross his red line. And of course Iraq, the country that Obama abandoned and then ignored when ISIS began growing because they were just a jayvee squad, after all.

If Obama's actions are proof positive, then it looks for all the world that he still has no idea how to fight ISIS. Blame it on the coalition and of course, Bush. According to a Boston Herald report, "this administration hasn't even disrupted the Islamic State's $2 to $3 billion war chest by tracking and freezing it's financial pipeline. I thought our sophisticated cyber technology was second to none? How is it that we have spent north of $40 million to train a mere five to nine Syrian rebels? Perhaps we should not spend the rest of the $500 million on this abysmal failure of a plan to fight ISIS. If only Obama had not fired all his top military commanders along with their strategic expertise.

A Chinese aircraft carrier and missile cruiser have just transited the Suez Canal. It appears that a Chinese task force is set to join Syria's Assad and Hezb'allah forces to counter the U.S. supported Sunni rebels in Syria. James Lewis notes, "The Russians and Chinese have limited force-projection capabilities, but put them together, combined with Iranian Revolutionary Guards, Hezb'allah and Assad troops, and you get the kind of force projection only the U.S. has possessed in the past half century."

There is a change in global power politics happening as we speak. A new axis is forming in the region and the United States is "On the Outside Looking In." "An' I wanna be, an I wanna be back on the inside." The lyrics of this Little Anthony and the Imperials love song is eerily consistent with this country's position in the Middle East. Well, except that President Obama does not really want to be on the inside does he? He wants to leave that onerous and deadly task to the next president doesn't he? What would Hillary Clinton do? We can all shudder to think. Implosion comes to mind. How's that for a "war on women" and children and the nation's survival. "A vote for Clinton is a vote for extinction." How's that for a bumper sticker?

This powerful coalition may actually put a severe "hurtin'" on ISIS and that would be a good thing. However, as the United States looks away, the potential for a world war conflagration as a result of this alliance of strange bedfellows is rapidly becoming a real possibility. We desperately need a Republican in the White House. One who can quickly rebuild our military and reassert our influence before the world is set ablaze by the vacuum left by this country's purposeful lack of leadership. That's right, Obama detests our exceptionalism and has willingly ceded our power and influence to others. How's that working out for the world?

The question of whether or not Obama is a Muslim is irrelevant. What is tragically relevant is that our president has shown his sympathies for the radical Muslim world by his actions and we have to reverse that trend before all our children and grandchildren are conscripted to go fight for the very survival of this country and our way of life.

Russ Wiles

  • Category: Letters
  • Hits: 93