Letter Submission

To submit a letter to the editor, please email us at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. Letters must contain the author's name, hometown (state as well, if not in New Hampshire) and phone number, but the number will not be published. We do not run anonymous letters. Local issues get priority, as do local writers. We encourage writers to keep letters to no more than 400 words, but will accept longer letters to be run on a space-available basis. Letters may be edited for spelling, grammar, punctuation and legal concerns.


There's a reason DOT doesn't want to own roundabout rec

To The Daily Sun,

In roundabouts, vehicles travel counterclockwise around a raised center island, with entering traffic yielding the right-of-way to circulating traffic. In urban settings, entering vehicles negotiate a curve sharp enough to slow speeds. The McFarland Johnson presenter at the Meredith Selectboard workshop specified that speed to be 15-18 mph in the Meredith application. Within the roundabout and as vehicles exit, slow speeds are maintained by the deflection of traffic around the center island and the relatively tight radius of the roundabout and exit lanes.

Modern roundabouts are much smaller than older traffic circles or rotaries and require vehicles to negotiate a sharper curve to enter than their older counterparts did. These two differences are what make travel speeds in roundabouts slower than speeds in traffic circles. The lower speeds mean reduced severity of accidents when they occur.

Roundabouts promote safety in several ways. The most common types of intersection crashes are right-angle, left-turn, and head-on collisions. The severity of collisions increases with vehicle speed. These types of crashes are mitigated in roundabouts because vehicles travel in the same direction at speeds less than 20 mph. Replacement of traffic signals with roundabouts can reduce the likelihood of rear-end crashes and their severity by removing the incentive for drivers to speed up as they approach traffic signals and by reducing abrupt stops at red lights. Do we have issues with the number of crashes in downtown or their severity?

Relative to other age groups, senior drivers are over-involved in intersection crashes. Older drivers' intersection crashes often are due to their failure to yield the right-of-way. Traffic flow at roundabouts is both slower and uni-directional, making the consequence for failing to yield is less severe. Particular problems for older drivers at traditional intersections include left turns and entering busy thoroughfares from cross streets. Roundabouts eliminate these situations entirely.

With that said, roundabouts themselves can be confusing. Extra signage and street marking is recommended as part of their use. When multiple roundabouts are placed in close proximity it amplifies driver uncertainty. Uncertainty is not an aid to traffic safety. Making combination two lane- one lane-roundabouts has very limited data available for review. Placing a combination two lane- one lane-roundabout sandwiched between two smaller single-lane roundabouts is likewise a lightly studied application.

To the extent that you agree with lowering the speed limit on Interstate 93 down to 55 mph you probably agree that roundabouts are a safety aid. With that said there is very limited information available on the effect of placing multiple roundabouts in a relatively concentrated area as is being proposed in Meredith. There is a reason why McFarland Johnson and NHDOT do not want to own the recommendation for placing three roundabouts in downtown Meredith. Sometimes balance between safety and other considerations is struck ... that's one reason the speed limit on Interstate 93 is 70 not 55.

Users of this intersection and businesses in the affected area need to get informed about this proposed project and get involved. Please reach out to the Selectboard with your concerns as they are readying a vote on the matter. They can be reached by e-mail at: Nate Torr This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., Peter Brothers, Vice Chair This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., Carla Horne, Chair This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., Lou Kahn This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., Hillary Seeger This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it..

Marc Abear


  • Category: Letters
  • Hits: 187

Buchanan columns send me right to google to uncover the lies

To The Daily Sun,

When ever I see Pat Buchanan's column I move right to the computer and load my google search engines. I know what he says will be a mixture of truth and lies. The lies will mostly be something anti-Democratic. In Friday's column for instance he talks about the riots of the 1960s to infer they were caused by the Democrats and the protests from Ferguson and New York to include and blame Sharpton, Holder and Obama. But some fact checking always helps in cases like this.

The riots of Watts started from a DUI and both Newark and Detroit were based on poverty and basic living conditions. The Newark riot was because, ¬≠well, what do you expect from Jersey. The Detroit riot started at an after-hours bar while a group of people were celebrating the return of two GIs home from Vietnam. The governor of Michigan was Romney's father, so he should shoulder some of the blame. The riots after the assassination of MLK were the last of them and were terrible as I remember them. Buchanan refers to the election of LBJ before these riots occurred. So, I assume that because LBJ was a Democrat he was to blame.

Regarding the protest marches in NYC, Buchanan goes out on a limb saying the marchers were associating the police with the KKK while they were calling for "dead cops". Again, it never happened. The dead cop comment was something FOX News spliced together from previous broadcasts. Just ask Clayton Morris. But Buchanan only wants to divide and incite. The social revolution of the 1960s brought a lot of changes and made our country better.

Since then the GOP has done nothing outside of trying to bring us back to the 1950s. That we can't let happen but in order to stop it you have to vote and hope it's not too late. This column by Buchanan who, did win the New Hampshire GOP primary back in 1996 but has been a consistent loser ever since, I give little credence to.

Jon Hoyt


  • Category: Letters
  • Hits: 166