Letter Submission

To submit a letter to the editor, please email us at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. Letters must contain the author's name, hometown (state as well, if not in New Hampshire) and phone number, but the number will not be published. We do not run anonymous letters. Local issues get priority, as do local writers. We encourage writers to keep letters to no more than 400 words, but will accept longer letters to be run on a space-available basis. Letters may be edited for spelling, grammar, punctuation and legal concerns.

 

Thanks for helping to make church's silent auction a success

To The Daily Sun,

The Gilford Community Church would like to take this opportunity to thank the following businesses, individuals and volunteers for making our Silent Auction on Gilford Old Home Day a success:

Gunstock Ski Area, Ippolito's, Rice Law Office, Law Firm of Lawson, Persson and Weldon-Francke, Normandin, Cheney & O'Neil PLLC, Mill Falls at the Lake, Uno's, Pizza Hut in Tilton, New Hampshire Motor Speedway, Wineing Butcher, Stonybrook Farm, Major Brands, Townhouse Marriott, Wayfarer Coffee Roasters, Petal Pushers, Nails by Shelly, Prayerful Touch Massage Therapy, Pizza Express, The Hair Factory Salon, Chili's, Hart's Turkey Farm Restaurant.

Also: Patrick's Pub & Eatery, WLNH/Binnie Media, Waterville Valley Ski Area, Snowy Owl Inn, Sports & Marina Parafunalia, Owl's Nest Golf Course, Gilford Lowe's, Gilford True Value, Gilford Home Center, Heaven Scent Florist, Gilford Village Store, Funspot, Claudia's Belvidere Beauty, Clark's Trading Post, Sanitary Cleaners, Winnisquam Dental, Children's Dentistry , Dr. Alan F. Kennell Orthodontics, Squam Lake Science Center, Stewart Associates, Belknap Landscape Company, Common Man, Plum Crazy Pizza, The McDonald Family, Pheasant Ridge Country Club, Budget Blinds, Manchester Monarchs, Fisher Cats.

Also: Kathleen Arenstam and Associates, Robin Baron Photography, Boulia-Gorrell, T-Bones/Cactus Jack's, Holy Grail, Beans & Greens, Baron's Major Brands Appliances, Belknap Tire, Lyon's Den, El Jimador, ReFresh, North Country Deli & Pizza, Nu-Do's, Judy Buswell, Judy Cook, Gail Engle, Kathy Dahll, Bill and Kathy McNamara, David and Janet Haley, Jim and Anne Colburn, Jack and Lisa Drouin, Bette Helfrich, Leslie Berghahn, Chris Matthews, Alan Beard, Marilyn Goodwin, Mark Richardson, Ginny Babcock, Muriel Middleton, Jeremy Dale, Steve Bauer, Christine Huntoon, Stacey Pate, Lisa Berghahn, Joe Fleck, Jessica Fleck, Michael Bryant, Katie Bryant, Joe Wernig, Peter Sawyer, and especially all our bidders!

My sincere apologies to anyone that I have missed.

Our Summer Fair at the church is our largest annual fundraiser and with everyone's support, we are able to make a difference in the lives of many through our outreach efforts from this event.

Sue Allen

Silent Auction Chair

Gilford Community Church

  • Category: Letters
  • Hits: 338

Breasts shouldn't be covered because someone finds them attractive

To The Daily Sun,

This letter is in response to Russ Wiles and his letter "Pretending there is no difference between a male and female breast is ridiculous."

Firstly, I must point out that in actuality there is no difference between the male and female breast and nipple. They are both anatomically the same and to suggest otherwise is ridiculous. In fact, in the womb babies develop nipples before genitalia. They develop nipples around 5 1/2 weeks and it isn't until around week 11 that a fetus begins developing genitals. Also, even though females generally have more milk ducts and larger milk ducts for breastfeeding, males do still have milk ducts and can lactate. In fact, there is evidence that shows men in internment camps begin to lactate when they are starving. With that said, the point isn't if we are indeed physically the same, the point is that we are all humans and deserve the same rights regardless of gender.

Later in his letter Russ makes the brilliant point that Free the Nipple supporters have made countless times. He says, "isn't the female breast, to which those nipples are attached to, a sexual part in a way that a man's is not?" If the breast is the part that is sexual then why are women allowed to show that part but not the nipple? Why is it that I can walk around completely topless as long as my nipples are covered? This makes no sense to me. We use breasts to sell everything from cars to cheeseburgers; We have giant billboards and magazine covers that show women with large busts and deep cleavage. If it is indeed the breast and cleavage that is the sexual part, then we might as well free the nipple too.

Russ then responds to what I said about breasts being for babies and children, not men or lovers. He writes, "I have always been under the impression that they served both purposes magnificently." The truth is, they do not. Our society values the sexual part of the breast over the actual nourishing function of the breast, hence why women are shamed for breastfeeding in public and often times encouraged to feed formula instead. Breasts are beautiful and they can be sexy and erotic much like any body part. Free the Nipple's goal is to knock the breast off the pedestal on which it has been placed. Breasts and nipples shouldn't be so hyper-sexualized to the point that a woman cannot even feed her baby without fear and embarrassment. I find men's calves sexy and attractive but it would be unfair to tell all men they must cover them.

Then, in his letter, Russ hypothesizes why people were offended and why it was illegal for men to expose their naked chests. He asks, "But didn't that have to do more with sartorial etiquette, rather than being titillatingly offensive?" Perhaps we should do some research and read some old newspapers and magazines to see what men and women alike were saying about this issue. Furthermore, can't we argue that today a woman is "supposed" to cover her breasts and nipples because it is a sartorial etiquette of our time? At one point it was offensive to see a female's naked ankle in public, but that changed, why can't we progress and lift the taboo from the female breast too?

The fact of the matter is, I shouldn't have to keep my breasts covered just because someone else finds them attractive. That is unfair. It is not my job to control the thoughts of others. If a woman is reading this and thinks to herself, "I don't want to show my breasts to everyone. I would rather only my lover see them." I say, wonderful! It is her choice to cover and she can if she wishes. I, on the other hand, enjoy swimming and tanning topless and that is my choice.

Kia Sinclair

Danbury

  • Category: Letters
  • Hits: 495