Letter Submission

To submit a letter to the editor, please email us at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. Letters must contain the author's name, hometown (state as well, if not in New Hampshire) and phone number, but the number will not be published. We do not run anonymous letters. Local issues get priority, as do local writers. We encourage writers to keep letters to no more than 400 words, but will accept longer letters to be run on a space-available basis. Letters may be edited for spelling, grammar, punctuation and legal concerns.


A perfect terror strategy for soft targets in country awash in guns

To The Daily Sun,

The NRA's blood-soaked, anarchistic agenda has been dealt a fatal blow. On Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court announced its refusal to hear an appeal of Rockland Park's post-Sandy Hook assault styled weapons ban of 2013. By leaving the gun ban in place, this decision gives the green light to states and municipalities who wish to ban "dangerous and unusual weapons" (as stated in the Heller decision of 2008). The Heller decision acknowledged the right to self-defense but also acknowledged the right of states and municipalities to regulate firearms and ban the unusually dangerous ones.

James McCoole neglected to mention this very crucial part when he brought up Heller recently. In June of this year, the justices also refused to hear the NRA's case against a San Francisco law that requires gun owners to keep their firearms in a locked container or use a trigger lock. In another major case, Kolbe v. O'Malley, a federal judge ruled that Maryland could ban AR-15 and AK-47 type weapons and held that these weapons, "fall outside Second Amendment protection as dangerous and unusual arms." It appears the federal judge purposely used Heller's words, "dangerous and unusual." With the high court refusing to hear the Rockland Park appeal, it is likely the Maryland ban will also stand. Happy Holidays!

For the second time this year, Republicans blocked legislation that would help prevent people on U.S. terrorist no-fly watch lists from buying firearms and explosives. What? This vote occurred at the same time the San Bernadino terrorist incident was under way. American-born al-Qaida spokesmen Adam Yahiye Gadahn (Jihadi Joe) directed Islamists in a 2011 video, "America is absolutely awash with easily obtainable firearms. You can go down to a gun show at the local convention center and come away with a fully automatic assault rifle, without a background check, and most likely without having to show an identification card. So what are you waiting for?"

A six-page jihadist document obtained by The Violence Policy Center (VPC) found in Afghanistan, "How Can I Train Myself for Jihad?" also instructs would-be terrorists "on the advantages the United States offers for firearms training and advises readers on how to exploit them." The booklet advises that in "some states of USA, South Africa, it is perfectly legal for members of the public to own certain types of firearms. If you live in such a country, obtain an assault rifle legally, preferably AK-47 or variations, learn how to use it properly and go and practice in the areas allowed for such training. Respect the laws of the country you are in and avoid dealing in illegal firearms. One can learn to operate many arms legally, so there is no need to spend years in prison for dealing in small, illegal firearms. Learn the most you can according to your circumstances and leave the rest to when you actually go for Jihad."

This is a perfect terror strategy for soft targets in a country that is awash in guns, anti-government paranoia, and bizarre armed protests. It seems entirely possible that the San Bernadino terrorists planned their attack using this stealth tactic because they practiced shooting regularly at local gun ranges right up until a few days before the attacks. Even if these killers were on the terrorist watch list, they were able to obtain the weapons of mass murder they used. According to the Guardian, "records show that in the 10 years up to 2014 some 2,233 people on the terror watch list applied for a federal background check to buy guns or explosives, and of those 2,043 were allowed to proceed." Say what? The bill sponsor, Sen. Diane Feinstein, noted after the vote, "If you're too dangerous to board a plane, you're too dangerous to buy a gun." But that is way too sensible for the gun nuts.

Right-wing gun laws make it easier for an unknown home-grown jihadist or even one on the terrorist watch list to walk into a gun show, buy a semi-automatic with armor piercing bullets, and then proceed to a soft target and slaughter people. They also make it possible for any disgruntled employee to acquired weapons of mass killing and take down people just because of anger, differences, or perceived abuse. The need for better gun control is not just about terrorism because almost 10,000 Americans having a bad day shoot and kill other 10,000 Americans each year. And 20,000 shoot themselves each year while in some hellish mental state or cognitively impaired condition.

In March this year the GOP effectively killed a law banning cop-killing, armor piercing bullets for long guns like the AR-15 and AK-47. The San Bernadino shooters could have been legally armed with these green tipped bullets when it took 28 well armed cops to stop the rampage. Responders could have died. Its time to dump these dangerous fools called politicians that don't have anyone's interest in mind except special interests.

James Veverka

  • Category: Letters
  • Hits: 366

Make Cafua people switch entrance to save the oak tree

To The Daily Sun,

When Cafua Management, Inc. built what they built on Union Avenue in Laconia, a condition was that Cafua would respect the big oak tree. Cafua apparently now wants to remove the tree in violation of it agreement, because the tree obstructs visibility of drivers exiting the property.

Simple solution: City Council should force Cafua Management to make the exit from the property into the entrance and reverse on the opposite end. I read that opinion by someone in The Daily Sun a long time ago. if Cafua says it can't be done, then let the City Council descend en masse and force the issue.

I don't live in Laconia but I shop on Union Avenue. I did so when I lived on Shellcamp Lake in Gilmanton and I still do so as a Plymouth resident.

I do not trust property management companies. When my home in Gilmanton went up in smoke in 2003, I looked to Franklin because I was employed, weekends, by a security company at Franklin Regional Hospital and later at Webster Valve. Franklin's downtown needed a boost and I wanted to be part of it.

All I saw involving apartment rentals were out-of-town property management firms. That turned me off. Property management only cares about dollars.

Thankfully, my weekday employers at Lakes Region Community Services steered me to Plymouth and here I'll stay.

Laconia City Council: don't let those Cafua people violate the agreement. Switch ENTER and EXIT, the tree stays and the people who care benefit.

Bill Carberry


  • Category: Letters
  • Hits: 337