A+ A A-

If we aren't vigilant, milfoil will eventually take over the lake

To The Daily Sun,

I am writing in support of Article 15 of the Moultonborough Town Warrant for 2014, pertaining to milfoil.

The milfoil problem in Salmon Meadow and Ash Coves was not addressed until 1991 and the first allowed treatment with Diquat did not take place until June 1997 at a total cost of $10,324 with Krainewood Shores Association paying $5,412, and the state of New Hampshire paying $4,912.

The association was allowed by the state to treat the coves every two years in the month of June with Diquat for the years 1999, 2001, 2003, 2005, and in 2007 used 24D. The total cost to Krainewood for all these treatments was $25,808.

The only treatment in those years was confined to chemical treatments and no divers were used. The only result that I could see was that the association was spending a lot of money with very little success.

Since the town took over the responsibility for the milfoil problem I have seen a drastic change in the coves because of the additional use of the divers. I used to be able to go around the coves in a canoe or kayak and easily spot tons of milfoil, and thought that we would never get this problem under control. The last two years I have had a difficult time spotting areas where the milfoil is thriving. I know that we will probably never get rid of it, but the current process has made great strides in controlling the problem.

If we do not keep up the vigilance on controlling the milfoil it will eventually take over the lake, and property values will plunge which would affect everyone in Moultonborough and surrounding communities.

I would like to thank the Milfoil Committee for their tireless work in addressing this issue and I strongly urge every Moultonborough resident to vote "yes" on Article 15 at the Town Meeting on March 15.

Joe Keegan


Last Updated on Tuesday, 04 March 2014 10:34

Hits: 299

Does this mean Sen. Forrester now supports Mediciad expansion?

To The Daily Sun,

An open letter to State Sen. Jeanie Forrester:

Sen. Forrester, I am confused.
Every opportunity you have had to date to vote on Medicaid expansion, you have voted "no." You voted "no" even with provisions added to give New Hampshire the right to opt out if the federal funding level was to drop.
Now I have learned you are holding an information session on what you are calling the "Senate Health Insurance Proposal," a so-called "two-year pilot program to help low-income New Hampshire residents purchase health insurance." In other words, Medicaid expansion.

Does this mean you now support Medicaid expansion? Or does it simply mean you will support a program that will give low-income New Hampshire residents access to health insurance for two years, or until the federal funding level drops below 100 percent, and then take it away from them?

Which is it, Sen. Forrester? There are about 58,000 Granite Staters that would like to know.

Kate Miller, Chair

Belknap County Democrats


Last Updated on Monday, 03 March 2014 11:58

Hits: 117

Ms. Landry's assertions regarding Cryan's duties are incorrect

To The Daily Sun,
This letter is in response to Rosemary Landry's letter in The Laconia Daily Sun on Feb. 26, where she stated that Grafton County Commissioner Mike Crayans, now a candidate for Executive Councilor, refused to recuse himself from voting on a county appropriation to Headrest Inc., a 501(c) (3) non-profit organization of which Mike was until recently the executive director. She also stated that "this behavior as a commissioner of Grafton County is unethical and the voters should decline his next appointment."
Ms. Landry, your assertions regarding the duties of county commissioners are incorrect. County commissioners do not by law have the authority or responsibility to vote on the county's budget. The County Delegation, which includes the elected members of the House of Representatives from that county, is responsible for budget appropriations for the operation of county government. In this role the delegates are in many ways more directly responsible for public spending. The county commissioners are the "executive branch" which is responsible for the day-to-day operations in both fiscal and policy matters.

If those of us who write letters in support of or against a candidate would adhere to moral, ethical, and honest information, what a well informed citizenry we would have.
Please join me on Tuesday, March 11, in supporting Mike Cryans for Executive Council.

Paula Trombi

Last Updated on Monday, 03 March 2014 11:53

Hits: 121

Phil Whittmann only Alton candidate working for local control

To The Daily Sun,

This coming March 11, the taxpayers of Alton will be asked to choose from three candidates for two seats on the Board of Selectmen.

Phil Wittmann is the only candidate who will work to preserve local control and protect Alton residents' private property rights and control over the education of its children.

Phil wants more transparency as relates to elected officials' actions, and is a fiscal conservative who will expose and fight against any wasteful spending of the taxpayers' dollars.

He is available to answer questions regarding warrant articles on which you will be asked to cast your vote. Some have been slyly crafted and could result in your voting against your intentions. Town officials are taking a second shot at pushing through certain items relating to your property rights which you soundly defeated in the past. I attended two meetings on workforce housing in Alton and there wasn't any support from the people. The only support was from "stakeholders," including your town planner, who is trying to tell you that his proposal has the people's support. Be very careful.

If you value local control and your private property rights, your vote for Phil Wittmann is imperative. Remember, your vote has serious consequences.

Vince Merola


Last Updated on Monday, 03 March 2014 11:50

Hits: 104

I will do my best to serve the needs of my fellow Alton citizens

To The Daily Sun,

An open letter to voters in Alton:

My name is Lou LaCourse and I'm running for selectman in Alton. I would like to let you know who I am and what I stand for.

I was born and raised in New Hampshire and I'm an independent and a conservative. My work experience is in manufacturing and includes quality, human resources, budgeting, planning and operations. I also serve on the Zoning Board of Adjustment and the Zoning Amendment Committee in Alton and do my best to serve the needs of my community. I'm an avid outdoorsman, hunter, fly fisherman and conservationist.

I believe the combination of my work background, experience in Alton's local government and outside interests provides me with the unique set of tools needed to do a good job representing my fellow citizens in Alton as we work together to complete Alton's Master Plan.

Alton will grow whether we want it to or not, and we need to put plans into action to anticipate and control the growth before it arrives. I don't want to see apartment complexes in Alton or multi-family buildings beyond the absolute minimum need. I do want to see taxes to stay low and prefer to find other means of increasing revenues when needed. I want to strip items in the town budget that do not need to be there.

We sometimes concentrate on a few items we find obvious, but "the devil is in the details," and in my experience small cuts in each of several areas will save much more money.

I don't pretend to have all the answers for Alton, but if elected will do my best to serve the needs of my fellow citizens. Please choose Lou LaCourse when voting for selectman in Alton.

Lou LaCourse


Last Updated on Monday, 03 March 2014 11:39

Hits: 114

The Laconia Daily Sun - All Rights Reserved
Privacy Policy
Powered by BENN a division of the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Login or Register