Letter Submission

To submit a letter to the editor, please email us at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. Letters must contain the author's name, hometown (state as well, if not in New Hampshire) and phone number, but the number will not be published. We do not run anonymous letters. Local issues get priority, as do local writers. We encourage writers to keep letters to no more than 400 words, but will accept longer letters to be run on a space-available basis. Letters may be edited for spelling, grammar, punctuation and legal concerns.


Why Democrats scream 'gun control' instead of 'terrorism'

To The Daily Sun,

I'm outraged! You should be!

The blood of the innocent, gunned down in California wasn't cold before president Obama, Nancy Pelosi and the rest of the rest of progressives had already blamed the massacre on the absence of common-sense gun laws. The underlying motive apparently is of little concern to them. They refuse to utter the words terror or terrorists, no matter how clear it is to everyone else with and IQ above today's temperature.

This is the exact same triangulate, distract and confuse BS we experienced from these people after the honorific tragedy in Benghazi that brutally killed ambassador Chris Stevens. Hillary and Obama have contrived every cover-up possible to suggest they were not sleeping on the job putting politics before the safety of the American people. This is what they are trying to pull off again.

In Libya the contrived liberal, fantasy was a video gone viral explained the slaughter. Then, as now every effort was made to avoid the word terror and terrorist when it was written all over the tragedy.

California was with near certainty a terrorist attack at some level — almost 100 percent to be religious and ethnic in it's underpinning. No one with a work place grudge drags his wife along and shoots 30 innocent people while in possession of thousands of rounds of different calibers of ammunition, plus bombs and a home lab exclusive to bomb making with strong ties to the Muslim world. In addition, he recently visited the Middle East. The insult to the dead and their relatives by these political tactics is reprehensible, if it is not criminal. It sure in hell isn't Christian at its heart. Politics first for Obama and Hillary.

There is no mystery why the attempted political cover-up with gun control issues, both in California and Benghazi. Every time there is a terrorist attack anywhere, especially in America, safety becomes a major concern. It should be, especially when facing an enemy that is willing to blow itself up while dropping their child off at the babysitter's on the way to murder 30 people or 3,000 people all while believing your god is praising your work. This is an enemy with thinking we have never faced. It is an evil unlike any we have experienced. A tiny few radicalized people can kill tens of thousands of Americans in a literal instant. That is the height of both crazy and scary.

When safety and security become the first priorities, two out of three Americans believe Republicans are by far the stronger party to protect their lives. Republicans will err on the side of security, not on the side of political correctness. Obama's "political correctness" has created a world as unsafe as it has ever been. Surely for U.S.

The pubic sees this, mush to the distress of Democrats. That is why Obama, Pelosi, Sanders and Hillary will scream gun control, not terrorism. Every time the word terror, terrorism or terrorist is used the election fortunes on the Democratic Party diminish. They know it and we do. I won't let the lives of the innocent dead be trampled on the way Hillary and Obama threw the life of Ambassador Chris Stevens under the bus for political cover. It is not happening this time. I urge other Republicans to speak out at the incredible indignity displayed by those atop the Democratic Party.

Tony Boutin

  • Category: Letters
  • Hits: 448

We'll spend $80M to keep another 300 from self-destructing

To The Daily Sun,

The town of Bristol is spending $1.1 million a year on a police department for 3,000 residents with 1,900 tax bills sent.

Now along comes Concord, with their new, old norm of spending money from dedicated funds. In addition to the $76.6 million being handed out to whatever department is lining up to get their share of the golden pot of funds, our RINO House and Senate has allocated to fight the war on drugs, now the legislative drug abuse task force panel is lining up to grab $3.5 million to beef up state and local law enforcement. $2.25 million to put more police on the streets, and $1.2 million to buy 27 state cruisers to add to the stockpile parked down on Hazen Drive. The money would be stolen from the states highway fund, the turnpike fund and from general funds, whatever they are. It's hard to tell what funds will be coming up short, what with this states crappy rankings for transparency and accountability, in public access to information and ethics.

Grants would be available to local departments by providing some matching funds. Tilton Police Chief Robert Cormier, who is the president of the state's Association of Chiefs of Police, said, departments would benefit from the additional manpower. Now wait a minute here, grant moneys are a one-time bust. When the funds dry up who's left holding the bag?

Two of Bristol's patrolman positions were created with grant money. Bristol's PD should be half the size it is for the size of the town we are. I do not believe that any of our selectmen or mayors or taxpayers have delegated the authority to the president of the Police Chief's Association to even suggest this harebrained scheme to the drug abuse panel, to build up local police departments without the consent of the local governments, using other state departments funds as grant money. In the Navy we called this behavior, over-exceeding your authority.

We all know how this will turn out. The finance division of the legislative Drug Abuse Task Force will move this forward, not because it will make a difference in drug prevention — they know it won't — but for all of the votes from unionized state law enforcement it will buy with taxpayer money for the upcoming election. It helps the lawmakers out with their corrupt decision making enormously when 80 percent of New Hampshire residents do not have a clue of what is going on in Concord. Eighty percent of New Hampshire residents do not even know who their state representatives are.

I am disgustingly disappointed in my choices I had made this last voting cycle, especially in the sellout RINO state senator who is on her fantasy trip of how she is going to eradicate drugs. I voted for her but i'll not make that mistake again. Looks like we are heading for $80 million to prevent another 300 drug users from self-destruction. Chief Cormier, the town of Bristol will decide if we need to enlarge its own PD; thank you very much.

Standing in an aisle at Market Basket in Tilton the other day, a young couple with a small child were looking over some ramen noodles, without a basket or shopping cart, when I over heard the little girl ask her daddy if the two of them could split a can of chowder because they did not have any food in the house. Chief Cormier, this is happening in your own hometown. Explain to that family who are going without food that you selfishly need to put more cops on the street, that will solve nothing. Say it loud and proud so all of the House and Senate can hear you.

Eric T. Rottenecker

  • Category: Letters
  • Hits: 221