Letter Submission

To submit a letter to the editor, please email us at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. Letters must contain the author's name, hometown (state as well, if not in New Hampshire) and phone number, but the number will not be published. We do not run anonymous letters. Local issues get priority, as do local writers. We encourage writers to keep letters to no more than 400 words, but will accept longer letters to be run on a space-available basis. Letters may be edited for spelling, grammar, punctuation and legal concerns.

 

Counting EMS calls leaves Bristol paying too much of the bill

To The Daily Sun,

Are Bristol taxpayers paying more than they should for Emergency Medical Service (EMS)? You decide.

Over the years many taxpayers of Bristol complain that Bristol was subsidizing EMS to the other towns it provides service for, but nothing has ever been done to verify this complaint. So, here are some interesting facts about the towns of Alexandria, Danbury and Hill — which Bristol charges a yearly fee for this service.

Fact one, according to the NHES website, as of 2013 Bristol, had a population of 3,051 residents, whereas Alexandria, Danbury and Hill have a combined total of 4,352 residents, 1,301 more people than Bristol. This equates to 41.21 percent for Bristol and 58.79 percent for the other three towns combined.

Fact two, according to the NHES web site from 2000 to 2013 Bristol has had a population growth of 18 people whereas the other three towns combined had a growth of 949 people. This equates to a growth of .059 percent of 1 percent for Bristol and 27.89 percent for the other three towns.

Fact three, according to NHES website, Bristol has an area of 17.1 square miles whereas the other three towns have an area of 108 square miles. This equates 13.67 percent for Bristol and 86.33 percent for the other three towns combined.

By now you may be seeing the bigger picture that while each of the other three towns, individually, is smaller, combined they are larger than Bristol. So, why does Bristol pays the lion share of EMS cost? At the annual meeting in March 2016, the fire chief will show that Bristol will pay 56.40 percent of the bill compared to 43.60 percent for the other three towns combined. This has been the calculated this way for many years, plus there are other capital expense items which Bristol pays even a larger share.

Recently I analyzed the data, compiled a report and sent this report to the Bristol fire chief, interim town admininstrator and selectboard, showing these fact and more. The report I sent to them should be used as a guide and for the selectboard to make improved decisions and for the voters of Bristol to voice their concerns. The town administrator should have 2016 PowerPoint from the chief in how all the towns agreed to calculate the billing rate.

The following is the town of Bristol's web page, http://www.townofbristolnh.org/index.html once there click on Government, Town Administrator or Town Selectboard for email addresses to get your copy or give the town a call.

Bristol EMS provides a great level of service — 24/7/365 coverage plus a second ambulance when possible. EMS services "people" as the "people" need the service, it's not there to count the number of calls each town has and bill accordingly.

Counting calls leaves Bristol paying even a larger portion of the bill, especially if the other three towns had fewer or no calls that year.

It is my hope the selectboard makes changes to this contract, and as good neighbors, Alexandria, Danbury and Hill will step up and start paying the real cost for the great coverage they receive.

One last fact: In the past two years a scheduled meeting took place to review the next year's rate and not one person from these towns showed up to discuss them. What does this tell Bristol taxpayers? The cost of 24/7/365 coverage is not cheap and the days of subsidizing needs to come to an end.

John Sellers

Bristol

  • Category: Letters
  • Hits: 259

Bernie Sanders is the true family values candidate in this race

To The Daily News,

Saturday, Dec. 12, will be the Women's Day of Action in support of Presidential Candidate Bernie Sanders. Throughout New Hampshire, events will be taking place highlighting Senator Sanders' longstanding commitment to women's rights and to policies benefiting women and families. Volunteers will also be gathering at the Laconia Campaign Office at 62 Canal St., starting at 10 a.m., to talk about some of these issues and to participate in phone banks and canvassing. Sanders supporters and others who want to learn more are encouraged to stop in.

So why Bernie Sanders? More specifically, why is Bernie the best choice when it comes to issues primarily affecting women?

Throughout Bernie's political career, he has been a consistent advocate for women. He has voted to protect women's right to choose and to have control over their own bodies. He has supported Planned Parenthood, which provides quality health care, including not only gynecological services but breast cancer exams and PAP tests, and services for low income pregnant women under the WIC (Women, Infants and Children) federal program (a program under repeated attack by Republicans). Sen. Sanders supports the expansion of services under the Violence Against Women Act (which addresses domestic and sexual violence against women) as well as the Family Violence Prevention and Services Act.

Bernie Sanders wants to raise the minimum wage to $15 an hour by 2020. Two-thirds of minimum wage earners are women. Currently, full-time women workers earn 78 cents for every $1 earned by men. This is why Sanders supports the Paycheck Fairness Act, which would provide procedural remedies for wage disparity based on sex discrimination.

Senator Sanders also supports providing 12 weeks of paid family leave after the birth of a child.

Is there any wonder why Bernie Sanders has received the endorsement of the Working Families Party? Started in New York State in 1998, the WFP now has chapters in 10 states and a huge supporter base. This is the first time that organization has formally backed a candidate in a national election, with over 87 percent of the WFP membership voting for Sen. Sanders.

Policies that are good for women are good for families. Policies that are good for families are good for America. Some politicians speak loudly about "family values" and then vote against every policy that actually helps families. Bernie Sanders is the true family values candidate.

Ruth Larson
Alton

  • Category: Letters
  • Hits: 746