A+ A A-

Remember the old adage: A dead fish rots from the head down

To the editor,
The events making news lately about Congressional investigations trying to get the truth on "who knew what and when" and those in positions of responsibility who say they were not informed and knew nothing, remind me of the old adage: "A dead fish rots from the head down".
Don Onofrio
Gilford

Last Updated on Friday, 24 May 2013 10:39

Hits: 370

Susan Estrich - Obama: Act II

How can it be that with Washington simmering in scandals, with Republicans (not to mention talk-show hosts) using the "I" word (impeachment) with abandon, with calls to bring back Ken Starr (of Bill Clinton/Monica Lewinsky fame), President Obama's job approval rating is holding steady at around 50 percent, thank you very much?
It is unchanged from April, when no one was talking about any of those things.
The explanation is easy: Unemployment is down; home sales and prices are at five-year highs. As always, it's the economy.
The surveys don't tell us, at least not for sure, whether the president's approval rating would be even higher were it not for all the hearings and finger pointing under the Capitol Dome. But they do tell us this: While more Republicans than Democrats are paying attention to the coverage of the scandals, overall, 75 percent of us just aren't watching any of it very carefully. And it's not even Memorial Day.
As for the supposed "Second-Term Curse," which is also getting its share of ink, the fact is that Congress is making steady progress on immigration reform, which traditionally has been one of the trickiest public policy areas for any president, Republican or Democrat.
Is the government working despite itself? Maybe.
Have the rest of us grown so scandal-weary after so many years of partisan bickering and hyped-up hollering that we hardly know a real scandal from a look-alike? Maybe.
So should the president just relax and go play nine holes? Absolutely not.
For Barack Obama, the question is not whether he will win the next election. There is no next election. The question is whether his presidency will be judged a success, what his legacy will be, whether people will look back at his tenure and say that, all in all, the country was in good hands.
Obama was re-elected despite a still-struggling economy, for reasons that had as much to do with demographics and Republican mistakes as his own successes. His signal accomplishment — the passage of Obamacare — is about to face the acid test.
Will it "work"? Will Obamacare, like Medicare, soon be seen as an accepted (and essential) part of American life? The administration, in advance of the graduation speech season, was priming officials to emphasize to graduates and their parents how much Obamacare is already helping them. But allowing our kids to stay on our health plans after they graduate isn't enough to cause a wholesale embrace of "exchanges" and "mandates" and the rest — words that are on the verge of becoming reality.
Likewise, while the economy is improving, big problems loom. Today's college graduates face an uncertain future, to say the least. According to a study out last month from the Economic Policy Institute, unemployment among recent college grads (ages 21-24) has averaged just under 9 percent over the past year. But the "underemployment rate" — the number you get when you add in those working part time and those who have stopped looking for work — is more than twice that. After adjusting for inflation, young college grads working full time make about $3,200 a year less than they did in 2000.
Virtually every parent I know with kids in this age group is not just keeping them on their health plan; they're helping to support them one way or another. To quote Paul Ryan (of all people, I know): "College graduates should not have to live out their 20s in their childhood bedrooms, staring up at fading Obama posters and wondering when they can move out and get going with life."
The challenge for the president is not simply to survive the "scandal du jour." It is to make Obamacare work. It is to help today's young people move forward. It is to move beyond the scandals to successes that are worth paying attention to.
Based on what we've heard to date, I feel confident that the president won't be impeached. But whether he will be celebrated as a great president is a question that ultimately will be answered by many of those underemployed college grads who are still staring at the old posters, as well as their parents, who are still paying the bills.
(Susan Estrich is a professor of Law and Political Science at the University of Southern California Law Center. A best-selling author, lawyer and politician, as well as a teacher, she first gained national prominence as national campaign manager for Dukakis for President in 1988.)

Last Updated on Wednesday, 31 December 1969 07:00

Hits: 296

90% in favor but we have no new gun violence legislation

To the editor,
Senator Ayotte sent me a long e-mail saying that she wanted to "fix" the problem of gun violence. She said that she wanted stronger background checks. Think that will happen?
I replied that we now have no new gun violence legislation, despite roughly 90 percent approval for stronger background checks. Nothing.
Ayotte supporters seem to have equal representation in letters to The Citizen of Laconia, but I feel that most readers are against her decision.
Dick Devens
Center Sandwich

Last Updated on Thursday, 23 May 2013 12:04

Hits: 248

So where is that 76 acres of floodwater supposed to go now?

To the editor,
I'm watching the "progress" on Tenney Mountain highway bank and fast food restaurant relocation construction. So let me get this right — with recommendation of the Plymouth Planning Board, the Town of Plymouth voted to fill in (raise above flood stage) an additional 76 acres of flood plain, effectively removing 76 acres from the flood plain.
So now where will this 76 acres of floodwater go? I suppose the next big Baker River flood we can blame on global warming and not on the fact that we are filling in the flood plain.
David Lorman
Plymouth

Last Updated on Thursday, 23 May 2013 12:00

Hits: 333

We're stuck in Victorian mind set, wanting tourists to pay our bills

To the editor,
The N.H. House voted down the casino bill last week giving as a reason that it would ruin the "New Hampshire Advantage". This is always brought up during public policy debates. Coined by a former governor of N.H., Steve Merrill (1993-1997), it means different things to different people. Most commonly, it refers to the state's business climate; lack of a sales or income tax; quality of life and a large citizen legislature, which I take it to mean that we here in New Hampshire like to take our time in deciding things!
I have a different take on the N.H. Advantage. We rank second only behind Maryland in the average median household income and second only to New Jersey in property taxes as a percentage of home value. This tells me one thing. We're stuck in a Victorian mind set where we want the tourists to pay all our bills.
In recent studies, the N.H. Advantage begins to dim a bit. Massachusetts added 41,000 jobs last year and Vermont added 3,000. By comparison, N.H. lost 2,000. An even more startling economic indicator is that the population growth is also slowing down. Thanks to the University of New Hampshire's high in-state tuition rate, we are easily one of the top three most expensive states to raise children.
Being a chess player, my next question to those purists who don't want a casino or income tax — what's your next gigantic move?
George Maloof
Plymouth

Last Updated on Thursday, 23 May 2013 11:46

Hits: 359

 
The Laconia Daily Sun - All Rights Reserved
Privacy Policy
Powered by BENN a division of the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Login or Register

LOG IN