Letter Submission

To submit a letter to the editor, please email us at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. Letters must contain the author's name, hometown (state as well, if not in New Hampshire) and phone number, but the number will not be published. We do not run anonymous letters. Local issues get priority, as do local writers. We encourage writers to keep letters to no more than 400 words, but will accept longer letters to be run on a space-available basis. Editors reserve the right to edit letters for spelling, grammar, punctuation, excessive length and unsuitable content.


People running for sate rep really have little connection to top of ticket

To The Daily Sun,

Bottom up. No that is not a drinking toast. Rather it is the way to look at your ballot and to vote on Nov. 8. We get it. You are tired and disgusted and confused about so much that has gone on in this interminable election cycle. And now there is the constant barrage of negative ads, mudslinging, name-calling, polling, and impossible promises as well as the so-called "debates" that are designed to entertain and attack rather than inform.

You are right to be concerned about the division in the country, the fact that people can't seem to disagree without acrimony, accusations that "the other" is "trying to destroy the country" and even threats of everything from rebellion to assassination. Yes, we get it. And we get your desire to forget the whole thing and not bother to vote at all.

But let's get back to "bottom up." People running to be your state representative or state senator really have very little connection to the top of the ticket. We don't have the television ads or the debates and we certainly don't have the money. What we do have is a desire to represent the local community, to listen to the local issues and to try to solve the problems that face New Hampshire. And yes, we do register as being associated with one of the political parties whose leaders and campaigns have you so upset. But our focus, like yours, is our community, our town.

I am running to be a state representative for Gilford and Meredith. With three other dedicated candidates, Lisa DiMartino, Nancy Frost, and Johan Anderson, I want to bring your issues to Concord and to work with the entire House to find solutions to the many problems facing our state and to build on the many successes and advantages that New Hampshire already enjoys. I hope that you will look at the bottom of your ballot to find our names. You can be sure that we will listen to your concerns now before the election and afterwards once the hard part of governing begins. We look forward to meeting you as we knock on doors to ask for your vote. And again after the election when we will focus on the concerns that affect your daily life. Those of us listed at the bottom of the ballot are the ones who most directly affect you, your business, your schools, your family and your town. So please vote Bottom Up for Johan Anderson, Nancy Frost, Lisa DiMartino and me, Dorothy Piquado.

Dorothy Piquado

  • Category: Letters
  • Hits: 363

Ray Howard has a sorry voting record and he can't hide from it

To The Daily Sun,

In his crafty letter of Nov. 2, attempting to deflect attention from his voting record, Ray Howard states that he is "not a politician." This non-politician has run for Cemetery Commission, chair of the Cemetery Commission, state House of Representatives, and state House of Representatives again. His letter begins with thanks to the voters of Belknap County, and ends with a plea for our support. Not a politician?

More importantly, the only issue from my letter that he addresses is the opioid crisis and he voted against all of the bills attempting to deal with the problem. The vast majority of his fellow Republicans supported the measures, which passed by large margins. So when Rep. Howard states that his votes "are in line with the Republican platform," I can only respond that his votes are not in line with the actual voting of the the Republican-led House. And what exactly does Mr. Howard think should be done about the drug problem? Apparently nothing.

Tell that to the mother who lost her son to an overdose. Tell that to the local business that gets burglarized by addicts. Tell that to the taxpayers who have to pay increased law enforcement and jail costs because of the problem. If Belknap County did not want to address this problem, then it should not have voted for the new corrections center, but should instead have voted for a larger jail to house the inevitably greater inmate population. (Parenthetically, Ray Howard voted for the corrections center, but clearly had no idea what he was voting for.)

Mr. Howard carefully avoids mentioning Meals on Wheels. If this is a program that only a liberal Democrat could support, then that will be surprising news to my Republican friends. Most Belknap County residents want seniors to be able to remain in their homes as long as feasible, and enthusiastically support programs such as Meals on Wheels and senior medical transportation with that goal in mind. Rep. Howard, on the other hand, would yank away that helping hand and leave seniors adrift.

So who is the outlier here, this liberal Democrat or Ray Howard? He is to the far right of his own party, even in this heavily-Republican area. His policies, if enacted, will cost us all dearly in the long run.

Finally, as for Mr. Howard's swipe at me regarding Gunstock, it is simply another attempt to distract Belknap County voters from his own sorry voting record by misrepresenting a vote I took as a Gunstock commissioner. In that capacity, I took an oath to protect Gunstock in furtherance of the public interest, to do everything in my power to make sure Gunstock remains an asset to, not a liability of the county. Raiding the coffers of Gunstock to pay for things like more corrections officers at the county jail would be completely contrary to the laws that set up Gunstock and provided safeguards against the delegation taking such action.

It should be noted that neither I nor any other Gunstock commissioner voted to, as Representative Howard claimed, "not reimburse the county taxpayers the millions of tax dollars that were used in 2001 to bail out Gunstock when it was insolvent." The inaccuracy of his statement shows a complete lack of knowledge of the relationship between Gunstock and the county, and a total disregard for the statutory responsibilities of the Gunstock Area Commission. It is a perfect example of the close-minded thinking that Mr. Howard has exposed in his years in the state House.

Let's help this non-politician truly become one, out of office.

Ruth Larson


  • Category: Letters
  • Hits: 336