Letter Submission

To submit a letter to the editor, please email us at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. Letters must contain the author's name, hometown (state as well, if not in New Hampshire) and phone number, but the number will not be published. We do not run anonymous letters. Local issues get priority, as do local writers. We encourage writers to keep letters to no more than 400 words, but will accept longer letters to be run on a space-available basis. Editors reserve the right to edit letters for spelling, grammar, punctuation, excessive length and unsuitable content.


Per state law, determiniation of a default budget rests with board

To The Daily Sun,

I ask Gilford's voters to please consider the following facts as you head to the polls today.

• Between 2011 and 2017, the School Board's requested budgets have averaged a conservative 1.01 percent a year increase. The Budget Committee's recommended increases during that same seven-year span has been 0.96 percent a year; a mere 0.05 percent trim after thousands of "man-hours" of scrutiny.
• As of 2015, Gilford's overall tax rate of $17.97 was in the 83rd percentile (with the 100th percentile being the best/lowest). The municipal tax rate was in the 65th while the school's was in the 78th. (source: Department of Revenue Administration - DRA)

• The Department of Education has the official school data. Gilford's 2016-17 cost per pupil cost is $18,210.25 – nowhere near the $22,000 per student erroneously asserted (for the upcoming budget year) by at least one Budget Committee member. Its cost per pupil is less than that of Inter-Lakes and no less than 44 other school districts within the state. (source: State Department of Education)

Yet year after year, some members of the committee would have us believe the School Board has been reckless with taxpayer money. Don't believe claims of "runaway taxes." The above data show that such claims are more about personality differences than objective facts. Despite certain Budget Committee members calling the School Board and school officials derogatory terms such as "overpaid public servants," "obfuscators," and "liars," the School Board and administration consistently strike the proper balance of school needs and budgetary constraint. In fact, the School Board and the Board of Selectmen both deserve thanks from Gilford's taxpayers, as both have historically exercised fiscal prudence.

On the subject of the default budget: Per RSA 40:13, the determination of the default budget rests with the governing body. Period. Certain Budget Committee members can't accept that despite continued assurances from the school's attorney and DRA, which is the overseeing body, that there have been no transgressions in terms of how the default budget has been calculated in the past. If the Budget Committee does its job, its members should not be concerned with the default budget.

Please vote "Yes" on school Articles 2, 3, and 4, and "No" on school Article 8.

Fred Butler

  • Category: Letters
  • Hits: 366

Please join us in voting for Sonny Patten for selectman in Belmont

To The Daily Sun,

Sonny Patten has lived in Belmont for 37 years, where he ran a successful business for many years. He has devoted 26 years to being a member of the Planning Board, helping to accomplish many advances — one being the re-writing of the zoning ordinances in 1992. All of this for the betterment of Belmont and its towns-people.

Please join us in supporting Sonny for selectman.

Reggie Caldwell

Sherryl Caldwell


  • Category: Letters
  • Hits: 341