Letter Submission

To submit a letter to the editor, please email us at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. Letters must contain the author's name, hometown (state as well, if not in New Hampshire) and phone number, but the number will not be published. We do not run anonymous letters. Local issues get priority, as do local writers. We encourage writers to keep letters to no more than 400 words, but will accept longer letters to be run on a space-available basis. Letters may be edited for spelling, grammar, punctuation and legal concerns.

 

Wouldn't have been a record turnout if voters weren't prepared

To The Daily Sun,

This letter is intended to amplify an article in the March 14 edition of The Laconia Sun.

When I entered the Moultonborough Community Auditorium (sign above entrance) for the Town Meeting on March 12, I expected and was prepared for an extended debate on Article 2, the $6,491,000 proposal for a community center.

Shortly after debate began, one voter motioned to "move the question" and the legislative body (the voters) affirmed the motion ending debate and starting the voting.

After the vote defeating Article 2, several selectmen alleged a "conspiracy" to "stifle debate" and alleged that the Town Meeting had been "hijacked." Everyone needs to know that there was no conspiracy. No one knew that a motion to call the question would be made early in the debate that would preclude further discussion. The margin on motion to end discussion was substantial.

Initially, with others, I wondered whether a lengthy debate would have made a difference in the 63.2 percent "no" vote. In my opinion, it would not have. After all, this was not a contest of debate teams with a surprise topic that judges were determining a winner to. At the Town Meeting, minds were made up. On Candidates' Night, held less than a week before, the question was asked as to how many voters had not made up their minds on the article, and not one person raised their hand.

The voters at the Town Meeting were similarly firm in their decisions. There would not have been a record turnout if voters were not prepared to vote their convictions.

Had Moultonborough been an SB-2 town, there would have been no debate, as the proposal would have been as set forth on the printed ballot, a simple "yes" or "no."

As other voters, I came prepared with a statement regarding my objections to the proposed Community Center that it was (1) too large, (2) improperly sited, (3) would preclude the recommended concept of a village green for the Taylor property, and (4) disrupt Route 25 traffic, if access were provided for parking at mid village. I prepared four amendments to correct those deficiencies and notified the moderator prior to the meeting. I previously stated in letters to the editor that I was conceptually not opposed to a properly sited, modest Community Center.

The several selectmen who were critical of the early motion to end debate, should have directed their complaints to the moderator, who under the rules, had the authority to defer consideration of the motion.

Finally, I would like to comment on the ill-conceived selectman's motion to reconsider, seconded by another selectman, which appeared intended to obtain a re-vote after a substantial portion of the voters had left the meeting. While there was some debate as to whether the Municipal Finance Law would preclude a same-day vote to reconsider, I moved to amend to add the seven-day requirement, as a vote the same day with substantial numbers of voters gone would have been unconscionable. I added to the seven-day delay, a requirement for publication of a re-vote in the Town Web Site and a local newspaper.

That amendment prompted the selectman who had initiated the motion to reconsider, to summarily withdraw it.

Eric Taussig
Moultonborough

 

  • Category: Letters
  • Hits: 364

Let's start an 'Amazing' new party & get Stephen Tyler to run

To The Daily Sun,

In light of John Boehner's endorsement of Paul Ryan (who is not running) for president, I would like to offer an endorsement to Steven Tyler.

First of all, I would like to see Steven Tyler run for president because concert tickets have gotten very expensive and I suspect his rallies would turn into free Aerosmith concerts. Furthermore, the State of the Union Address has gotten really boring in recent years and now that we're all relying heavily on platitudes to make political decisions, we could be told musically that everything's "Amazing", and to "Dream On" and myriad other entertaining treats which seems to be what the general public so desperately craves.

But seriously folks, don't you think it would be much better to have Steven Tyler as a two term president when because frankly, "We're Living on the Edge" with Kanye West's promise to run in 2020.

We may have to start a new party to pull this off, but Steven Tyler is a legendary partier and if anyone can do it, he can.

So, let's put America "Back in the Saddle!" I encourage all of you to "Walk this Way" and join me in supporting someone who isn't running for president for the office.

Hillary Seeger
Meredith

  • Category: Letters
  • Hits: 543